It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

World Trade Center 7 Explosion and Controlled Collaspe Caught on Tape.

page: 25
135
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 07:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: hellobruce

I don't need to,


Spo as expected you made a claim but are unable to back that claim up!


the proof is in their documents.


Link to these "documents"? Or are you referring to the video of their "research" that I showed?




posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 07:27 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

To many documents to show, go to their website and educate yourself. www.ae911truth.org...
edit on 4-7-2015 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 07:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: hellobruce

To many documents to show, go to their website and educate yourself. www.ae911truth.org...


Nothing there showing it was a controlled demolition.... care to link us to the document that shows that? Unless....



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 08:15 PM
link   
The first videos and the evidence presented in this thread adds more evidence to the fact that World Trade Center 7 was pulled to avoid further loss of life and property damage, more over the owner or the towers, firemen, witnesses, architects, engineers and people in the demolition field have all come to the conclusion that World Trade Center 7 was brought down in a controlled manner as the secretary of state mentioned on tape.

They had to bring down World Trade Center 7 because they had no fire fighters available and most importantly no water to fight the small fires, so they made the decision to PULL building 7, and they watched it fall as the records state.

Thanks for the contributions in spreading what most people knew about World Trade Center 7 being a controlled Collapse



edit on 4-7-2015 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 08:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shadow Herder
The first videos and the evidence presented in this thread adds more evidence to the fact that World Trade Center 7 was pulled to avoid further loss off life and property damage,


Yes, they pulled the fire crews out when their transit and the noises the building was making showed it was going to collapse.


Thanks for the contributions in spreading what most people knew about World Trade Center 7 bein a controlled Collapse.


So when did they install the tonnes of explosives, have workmen knocking holes in walls with man years of work needed and nobody noticed? Funny how you keep avoiding this simple question, as you know it totally destroys your silly conspiracy theory!

Why do truthers think repeating the same much debunked silly story will suddenly make it true?
edit on 4-7-2015 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 08:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce
The first videos and the evidence presented in this thread adds more evidence to the fact that World Trade Center 7 was pulled to avoid further loss off life and property damage,



Thanks for the contributions in spreading what most people knew about World Trade Center 7 bein a controlled Collapse



So when did they install the tonnes of explosives, have workmen knocking holes in walls with man years of work needed and nobody noticed?
Like you have been told and it has become evident your comprehension level is lacking to deal with subjects as important as this one.


So you would need "tons of explosives" Holes in walls, "Man years" to do what sporadic fires achieved in a few hours?
Usual debunker backwards , silly thinking or lack there of.

Tower 7 was brought down in a controlled manner. IT had to, if the fires were to be left alone the building could of burned for days causing possibly more loss of life and even more property damage

Next images show you the controlled collapse of World Trade Center 7

edit on 4-7-2015 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 08:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Shadow Herder

It's amazing how the fires, burning for hours, didn't affect the explosives at all, isn't it?



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 08:33 PM
link   
Here is a compilation of the controlled collapse of World Trade Center 7. In some of the clips u can here multiple charges going off.



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 08:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Shadow Herder

It's amazing how the fires, burning for hours, didn't affect the explosives at all, isn't it?



That's because column 18 was the column that caused the penthouse to collapse to the mid level of the building and was not damaged by fire or the collapse of the Wtc tower yet it is the one that failed. NIST has concluded that wtc was NOT brought down by diesel fires but office furniture. The damage to the wtc 7 was on the SW corner and the 18th column was on the other side.

Will provide links to the debunked NIST report shortly
edit on 4-7-2015 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 08:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Shadow Herder

It's amazing how the fires, burning for hours, didn't affect the explosives at all, isn't it?


Also amazing how none of the wires used to wire it all up were damaaged, and they also managed to remove aall the traces of explosives, detonating caps and wires before they started the clean up - with no one noticing!

Almost as if they did not use explosives at all....



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 08:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shadow Herder
Here is a compilation of the controlled collapse


No, they are just pictures of the WTC 7 collapsing due to severe damage and fires - there are no pictures of any "controlled collapse, as remember how no explosives were installed?



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 08:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shadow Herder
IT had to, if the fires were to be left alone the building could of burned for days causing possibly more loss of life


Wrong again - you seem to ignore the fact that they pulled the firefighting crews out of the danger area, as the noises the building was making and the transit they had on the building showed it was going to collapse. Remember, no one had time to install the tonnes of explosives needed for a demolition!



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 08:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Shadow Herder
IT had to, if the fires were to be left alone the building could of burned for days causing possibly more loss of life


Wrong again - you seem to ignore the fact that they pulled


You are forgetting the fact the NIST has stated that there were no firefighting efforts taking place at World Trade Center 7 so there was nothing to pull it (doesn't make sense eh?) . You are mistaking it with the fact the World Trade Center and its owners decided to "pull it" (controlled collapse) to reduce the loss of life and property damage as he stated.

The claim that he meant pull them out is not only stupid but no one uses "pull it" like that and has been proven to be a fabrication of some irritated debunkers.
edit on 4-7-2015 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)


We all know what Larry Silverstein meant when he said it, its only you 2-3 that are attempting to regurgitate the hope
edit on 4-7-2015 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 09:13 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

You sir, did not go to the website that I gave you, it takes weeks to read all the information! Troll much!



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 09:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Shadow Herder

There was no consultation with the owners of WT7 or anyone else, it was the fire chief's call and his call alone to clear a collapse zone around the building.

This is well documented, Fire chief Daniel Nigro is on record stating as such.



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 10:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: JamesCarrot
a reply to: FlyingFox


The reason people are talking about the melting point of steel is because red hot liquid molten steel was found at the site days after the building had came down.


Not to be nitpicking, but "days later" is far out of context.


edit on 4-7-2015 by FlyingFox because: freedom



posted on Jul, 5 2015 @ 12:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
l it takes weeks to read all the information! Troll much!


You are the one trolling here, claiming there is evidence but being unable to actually show any such evidence!



posted on Jul, 5 2015 @ 12:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Shadow Herder
It Is fact that loud explosions were heard emitting from under the WTC 7




So when are you going to tell us more about these loud explosions emitting from under WTC 7 ?

You claim it is a fact where is your evidence ?

WIC 7 was sitting on solid ground, no basement, that is a fact.



posted on Jul, 5 2015 @ 12:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
I have no idea why you all are discussing this about WTC7, it has been proved it was a classic demolition by Architects and Engineers years ago. For those who don't know should go to their website.


Man up and go to the website and show us something that proves " it was a classic demolition ".

Give us a direct link to your strongest evidence.



posted on Jul, 5 2015 @ 12:29 AM
link   


You are forgetting the fact the NIST has stated that there were no firefighting efforts taking place at World Trade Center 7 so there was nothing to pull it (doesn't make sense eh?) . You are mistaking it with the fact the World Trade Center and its owners decided to "pull it" (controlled collapse) to reduce the loss of life and property damage as he stated.
a reply to: Shadow Herder

FDNY made a run at WTC 7 about 11AM - sent crews in to search the building to insure it was clear and to attempt to extinguish the fires

Found extensive structural damage, including elevator cars ejected from shafts, also found no water pressure
in standpipes and fires breaking out. With no water Incident commanders made decision to remove crews from building

That is when crews were "pulled" aka told to evacuate building ......

As for demolishing WTC to limit damage - the owners of WTC 1, 2, 4,5,6 was the Port Authority of NY & NJ
So the Port Authority "pulled" their own buildings ??

WTC 7 was only building owned by Silverstein, he was only renting the remaining buildings in complex

As for limiting damage - collapse of WTC 1 & 2 crushed WTC 3, Marriott Hotel, estimated 40 people died there

WTC 2 fell into 130 Liberty St, Deutsche Bank Building, slashing it open so had to be demolished. WTC 1 fell into WTC 7
damaging it and starting fires which resulted in collapse of it

Fires were started at 90 West St, 2 people were trapped in building and died, it was gutted by fire

Some idea of limiting loss of life and damage .........



new topics

top topics



 
135
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join