It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I have never said Russia has violated our airspace, i have only said that they have not had their transponders on as it should..
originally posted by: kitzik
a reply to: dollukka
I remember a couple of pages ago you yourself said that Russia is not violating Finnish airspace.
originally posted by: dollukka
a reply to: kitzik
I have never said Russia has violated our airspace, i have only said that they have not had their transponders on as it should..
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: tony9802
Is this what you're referencing?
No Russian Troops.
If it's something else, please let me know.
originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: seagull
The local Geography certainly helps!
But with the Swiss, just bottle them up in their mountain fortresses - they'll run out of Muesli before long! No need to even invade, just camp outside and block all the entrances
originally posted by: Tryptych
This is just part of the anti-Russia fear mongering going on in here.. we've had the worst (neoliberal) government in history, now they lost the majority in the Parliament but they're still in the government. Bilderberg, NWO treasonists each and every one of them.
Basically all of the MSM is controlled by same interests and the fearmongering is just off the scale.. a VAST majority (at least 80%) of the people want to stay out of the NATO and keep good relations with Russia, so they're playing it really dirty to try to lure us in.
Just a bunch of NWO lunatic BS that gets ZERO support from the people here.
Oh yeah, the "submarine" story was such a farce and the "depth charges" dropped were just warning shots, not real bombs. It's a damn joke. Might as well been a whale or an underwater unicorn.
originally posted by: DuckforcoveR
Thank you for that. 👍 the Swiss I knew were neutral, but I honestly never questioned why. The "biggest army" is because of the fact everybody has a gun and is trained from a young age, right? And Finland is new to me, I tend to point a scope with my history lessons and I sometimes forget the bigger picture instead of focusing in the details. Apologies.
But thank you. I'm really interested in learning more about their strategic advantage when it comes to their geography.
And I agree completely. The UK is on a pretty impenetrable land mass. It would take a nuke to quell the masses and land ashore. Luckily, the nuke should keep anybody from wanting to (probably a bad way to put that)
a reply to: stumason