It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Finland Instructs Nearly a Million Military Reservists

page: 5
10
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 23 2015 @ 12:25 PM
link   
a reply to: dollukka

quoting dolukka




I have never said Russia has violated our airspace, i have only said that they have not had their transponders on as it should..


I don't know how to understand this



Imagine that Russia will fly with transponders on all the time, do you imagine how many more times you will see Finnish aircrafts trying to intercept Russian planes flying 20 km from Finnish zone ?

Give your pilots some rest

Ok, I'm now off.




posted on May, 23 2015 @ 12:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: kitzik
a reply to: dollukka




Why would they need to ask Russia when commercial radar and data shows it clearly?


I'm getting tired to explain you obvious things.


If it tires you so much.. then do not bother responding.. Do you see?



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 12:51 PM
link   
a reply to: tony9802

Russia does not need to be anywhere near Finiish airspace.. or Swedish airspace, or Norweigian airspace,
or British airspace..

What do they want there..?

edit on 23-5-2015 by tony9802 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 12:55 PM
link   
a reply to: tony9802

I think Russia is getting ready for WWIII..

Otherwise,

Why are there Russian troops in the U.S.? (Please do the research for that fact.) It is clear and very obvious, they are getting ready for WWIII.



They will side with the Islamic Socialism..
edit on 23-5-2015 by tony9802 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: tony9802

Is this what you're referencing?

No Russian Troops.

If it's something else, please let me know.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 01:08 PM
link   
a reply to: kitzik

You said

originally posted by: kitzik
a reply to: dollukka

I remember a couple of pages ago you yourself said that Russia is not violating Finnish airspace.


What i actually wrote was

originally posted by: dollukka
a reply to: kitzik


I have never said Russia has violated our airspace, i have only said that they have not had their transponders on as it should..



Your claim is incorrect ! ..
see bold letters



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 01:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Tryptych

Both Norway and Denmark paid a terrible price for practicing your brand of C#$P. The Nazis opened the doors with Fifth Columnists, and then rolled over the Scandinavians, in a Blitzkrieg. No anti Nazi force in Europe was available to stop the Nazis at the Dombas? Pass between Oslo and Trondheim. The Royal Navy did however, evacuate the Norge Royal Family from Trondheim, across the North Sea, to Britain, for the duration of the War. A group of long forgotten Norwegian youths did in fact, dig in and mount a suicidal defense at the Pass. This provided a window for their King's flight. But quislings, quickly showed the Nazis how to outflank their positions. After the war, things did not go good for these quislings.

And as usual, the Swedes sat on their behinds and watched the Nazi chaos unfolding all around them. Three out of the four Scandinavian countries are monarchies, which do not like each other. Today both Norway and Denmark are part of NATO, due to their Nazi Occupation. When the Germans occupied Finland, they were seen as defenders against the Red Army. Norway used to be ruled by the King of Denmark, and the southern half of Sweden was also part of his realm, as late as the 16 Century. When the dust settles after the next big European war, Gottebourg may once again be Denmark's Northern border outpost. Not that there's that much to fight over in the South of Sweden.



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: tony9802

Is this what you're referencing?

No Russian Troops.

If it's something else, please let me know.


You're terribly misinformed: all you have to do is search "youtube" Russian troops in US and then "Youtube" Jade Helm 15 (Texas), you will find that the information you have sourced is dishonorably incorrect, lying on all fronts. If you are not here at this basic level of information and intelligence.. then I would not try to bring it to your attention..

I cannot save you..
Sorry Seagull.. you actually remind me of very dead fish..

edit on 23-5-2015 by tony9802 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2015 @ 03:56 PM
link   
a reply to: tony9802

Oh, well...

YouTube... We're doomed.



posted on May, 24 2015 @ 12:22 AM
link   
a reply to: stumason Unit consolidation and designations are changed and letters are sent reassigning reservists on those occasions.

Although Finnish reserve troops would be overwhelmed by Russian forces, history says that the Russians will pay dearly. Simo Häyhä, known to Stalin's armies as “The White Death” was a reservist and probably the deadliest sniper in history. Russia would do well to let Finland alone. They are not a threat to anyone, Stalin got the Nickel deposits he wanted and gained 22,000 square miles of Finish land. Unfortunately, the Soviets lost 1,000,000 of their original 1,500,000 troops to the Finns. It has been reported that a Russian general said that the land they had conquered was “just enough to bury their dead”.



posted on May, 24 2015 @ 10:40 AM
link   
a reply to: pteridine

I just checked the figures earlier today and one million dead Russians is a huge exaggeration, I think the number was around 126 thousand casualties in total. Am I missing something here?



posted on May, 24 2015 @ 10:57 AM
link   
Well i would also keep close eyes on Finland and keep eme checkd, they like to play innocent and neutral but they really aint all that, its very clear actually, all neutrality is about making big business deals with Russia and thats that, they will jump in any wagon against Russia if there is war between for example America Vs Russia.
Finnish ppl like to curse allot of Russians because they attacked Finland in 2nd world war but maybe they did just that because Finnish was nazies allies?



posted on May, 24 2015 @ 11:40 AM
link   
a reply to: romilo

You would have been too, in same situation that Finland had in those days. Help was asked elsewhere but help was denied for favour to Russia and when all the other options were gone there were only one option or loose your country to Russia totally.

Finns have been proud about neutrality they have had. Now neutrality is not as easy piece of cake because of membership in EU but still a possibility.

Yes Finns have cursed Russia due what they did back then, Mainila shelling false flag by Russia.
And that is due that Russians had lied to them before War, During War and after the War. So there is a saying in Finland " Never trust a Russian " also " Russian is Russian even if you fry Russian with a butter"


And btw RUSSIA was German ally during Winter War.... Russians even blaimed UK to be behind finns and later during peace time between Winter war and continuation war they thought that UK and France are going to attack them through finnish territory ( propaganda letters by L Yakovlev and A Galin for russian troops )




edit on 24-5-2015 by dollukka because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2015 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: TheLaughingGod I probably quoted an article written by the Finns. It was a large price to pay in any case.



posted on May, 24 2015 @ 10:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: seagull

The local Geography certainly helps!

But with the Swiss, just bottle them up in their mountain fortresses - they'll run out of Muesli before long! No need to even invade, just camp outside and block all the entrances


Good luck with that. They have more fortified shooting positions and spider holes than the Japanese did on Iwo Jima, Not to mention I am pretty sure they have enough food and whine to last a few world wars in those mountains.



posted on May, 26 2015 @ 04:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Tryptych
This is just part of the anti-Russia fear mongering going on in here.. we've had the worst (neoliberal) government in history, now they lost the majority in the Parliament but they're still in the government. Bilderberg, NWO treasonists each and every one of them.

Basically all of the MSM is controlled by same interests and the fearmongering is just off the scale.. a VAST majority (at least 80%) of the people want to stay out of the NATO and keep good relations with Russia, so they're playing it really dirty to try to lure us in.

Just a bunch of NWO lunatic BS that gets ZERO support from the people here.

Oh yeah, the "submarine" story was such a farce and the "depth charges" dropped were just warning shots, not real bombs. It's a damn joke. Might as well been a whale or an underwater unicorn.


I agree with you, sadly people have no idea and will march and die in the next world war



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 06:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: DuckforcoveR
Thank you for that. 👍 the Swiss I knew were neutral, but I honestly never questioned why. The "biggest army" is because of the fact everybody has a gun and is trained from a young age, right? And Finland is new to me, I tend to point a scope with my history lessons and I sometimes forget the bigger picture instead of focusing in the details. Apologies.

But thank you. I'm really interested in learning more about their strategic advantage when it comes to their geography.

And I agree completely. The UK is on a pretty impenetrable land mass. It would take a nuke to quell the masses and land ashore. Luckily, the nuke should keep anybody from wanting to (probably a bad way to put that)


a reply to: stumason



Mate no offense, but do your own research if you want to know.
If you rely on people on Internet forums(especially ATS) to tell you what is what and help you form an opinion, you will be allowing your self to be influenced to their views and beliefs rather then forming your own.
A lot of the people on this site are biased one way or another. Especially when it comes to politics and war, and especially when it comes to Russia and the USA and especially with recent world events.



posted on Jun, 7 2015 @ 05:10 PM
link   
a reply to: mortex

That's exactly why I said I tend to point my scope when it comes to history lessons. It's not a "teach me so I don't have to learn", it's more of seeing / hearing a different perspective and then digging into it. I try very hard to draw my own conclusions AFTER listening to what others have to say, my heart has to say, and my own eyes have to see.

No offense taken, and if I came across as a sponge trying to soak up other peoples' ideas and opinions on a subject I humbly apologize.


eta: I also want to say that in my humble opinion, "do your own research" creates the exact problem that you mention when it comes to bias. Not asking for help understanding something, gluing yourself to google / youtube / etc, and finding yourself only clicking the links you personally think will provide true answers can (and will) lead you down a pretty nasty path. Civil discourse here or anywhere else is my preferred method for directing my periscope of curiosity. No offense mate

edit on 7-6-2015 by DuckforcoveR because: clarification



posted on Jun, 9 2015 @ 07:40 PM
link   
Never, EVER, turn your back to a Finn.
Do we have knives? We have knives like Americans have guns,
i got my first knife from my grandfather when i was four,
The difference being, you will never hear us coming.

edit on 9-6-2015 by LionOfGOD because: (no reason given)







 
10
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join