It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
California resident Gerilynn Aflleje was horrified when her 4-year-old Siberian Husky mix was killed by a local animal shelter over $180 in fees that she couldn't afford.
Her dog, Chunk, had been dropped off at the Stockton shelter after getting lost in 2013, she later explained at a city council meeting. When Aflleje discovered her dog there less than a week later, she said the shelter demanded $180 within 24 hours for storing Chunk.
Unemployed, Aflleje couldn't get the money in time. "We didn't only lose our pet. We lost a family member," she said.
In a number of cities across the country, animal control agencies are aggressively going after pet owners with big fines for small violations. Some hold people's pets until they settle their bills, even if it means they end up killed. Others leave the dogs alone but issue arrest warrants for owners who can't pay up.
money.cnn.com...
Outraged pet owners and animal rights attorneys say these harsh tactics are all about generating money and unfairly impact low-income Americans.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Spider879
Ugh !... How is this beneficial for society ? So the animal shelter puts the dog down because the owner cannot afford the bill,which is nothing but a ransom ...pay up or were gonna kill your dog........who comes up with this crap....
This "for profit" system is really showing some flaws........
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Spider879
The Royal Society for the prevention of cruelty to Animals should be engaged.
Killing an animal because of something totally beyond their control is cruelty at a fundamental level.
Absolutely bloody disgusting.
originally posted by: MysterX
a reply to: Spider879
So...they are Terrorists, thieves and extortionists then.
All three are a crime in America and many other countries...why are they getting away with three very serious crimes and yet somehow imagine they are legally safe?
originally posted by: Biigs
not that im agreeing with the actions taken, but why does an unemployed person who doesnt have 180 dollars keep a pet dog?