It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
The law is: If you own a business that serves the public, you are not allowed to discriminate. Freedom of expression is fine, but that freedom does not give you authority to discriminate.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
100% agreed. People should be free to say whatever they please. However, even if (to use the wedding example again) a business doesn't agree with a gay couple getting married, they cannot refuse service for that reason. Of course, during the business transaction they are by all means allowed to say "I don't agree with this". And nobody can stop that.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
So long as they do not actively advocate for violence against those they protest about, they should be free to spew whatever hate they please.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Seamrog
Are you familliar with WBC, sounds like you are describing them?..the epitome of uglyness and hate.
Yet you would agree that the government should not forbid them to speak, yes?
Right, because we recognize that the freedom of speech is essential to a free society, no matter how distasteful we may find some examples of it.
Why not? People have the freedom of association, the freedom of religion, and the freedom to own property. If one does not feel right in participating in or supporting a gay wedding, or a klan rally, or an NRA convention, why should the state force them to?
The way I see it, in a free society sometimes we have to tolerate behaviors we find distasteful in order to maintain a free society.
So if the law said you couldn't say certain things, you'd be okay with that since that's the law?
Yes, those that refuse to serve someone based on race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation is engaging in discrimination.
originally posted by: Seamrog
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
But see, I actually follow the constitution. I don't agree with one little iota of what the WBC has to say, but they are free under the U.S. Constitution to say it.
That's well and good, but it remains in your mind that Christians should be forced to do business under morally objectionable circumstances.
Those that won't are hateful bigots. Extremist, hateful bigots.
And you most definitely are a misguided leftist.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
The law is: If you own a business that serves the public, you are not allowed to discriminate. Freedom of expression is fine, but that freedom does not give you authority to discriminate.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
100% agreed. People should be free to say whatever they please. However, even if (to use the wedding example again) a business doesn't agree with a gay couple getting married, they cannot refuse service for that reason. Of course, during the business transaction they are by all means allowed to say "I don't agree with this". And nobody can stop that.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
So long as they do not actively advocate for violence against those they protest about, they should be free to spew whatever hate they please.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Seamrog
Are you familliar with WBC, sounds like you are describing them?..the epitome of uglyness and hate.
Yet you would agree that the government should not forbid them to speak, yes?
Right, because we recognize that the freedom of speech is essential to a free society, no matter how distasteful we may find some examples of it.
Why not? People have the freedom of association, the freedom of religion, and the freedom to own property. If one does not feel right in participating in or supporting a gay wedding, or a klan rally, or an NRA convention, why should the state force them to?
The way I see it, in a free society sometimes we have to tolerate behaviors we find distasteful in order to maintain a free society.
So if the law said you couldn't say certain things, you'd be okay with that since that's the law?
A Jewish person should be forced to service a Klan rally?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
The law is: If you own a business that serves the public, you are not allowed to discriminate. Freedom of expression is fine, but that freedom does not give you authority to discriminate.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
100% agreed. People should be free to say whatever they please. However, even if (to use the wedding example again) a business doesn't agree with a gay couple getting married, they cannot refuse service for that reason. Of course, during the business transaction they are by all means allowed to say "I don't agree with this". And nobody can stop that.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
So long as they do not actively advocate for violence against those they protest about, they should be free to spew whatever hate they please.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Seamrog
Are you familliar with WBC, sounds like you are describing them?..the epitome of uglyness and hate.
Yet you would agree that the government should not forbid them to speak, yes?
Right, because we recognize that the freedom of speech is essential to a free society, no matter how distasteful we may find some examples of it.
Why not? People have the freedom of association, the freedom of religion, and the freedom to own property. If one does not feel right in participating in or supporting a gay wedding, or a klan rally, or an NRA convention, why should the state force them to?
The way I see it, in a free society sometimes we have to tolerate behaviors we find distasteful in order to maintain a free society.
So if the law said you couldn't say certain things, you'd be okay with that since that's the law?
The law can't say that because it violates the 1st amendment. It is a poor example and would never become a law in this country (too many are on the lookout for such laws coming down the pipeline to allow something like that being passed in this day and age).
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
Yes, those that refuse to serve someone based on race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation is engaging in discrimination.
originally posted by: Seamrog
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
But see, I actually follow the constitution. I don't agree with one little iota of what the WBC has to say, but they are free under the U.S. Constitution to say it.
That's well and good, but it remains in your mind that Christians should be forced to do business under morally objectionable circumstances.
Those that won't are hateful bigots. Extremist, hateful bigots.
And you most definitely are a misguided leftist.
Discrimination in the name of religion is still discrimination. It's that simple. You're letting your personal feeling on the matter of homosexuality define how YOU interpret the law, when it's perfectly clear. You are free to practice your religion however you choose, so long as it does not interfere with the rights of others.
If the Jewish person ran a deli and a KKK person wanted them to cater a KKK event, the Jewish businessman cannot discriminate against the KKK and refuse to cater the event. The Jewish businessman serves the public.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
The law is: If you own a business that serves the public, you are not allowed to discriminate. Freedom of expression is fine, but that freedom does not give you authority to discriminate.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
100% agreed. People should be free to say whatever they please. However, even if (to use the wedding example again) a business doesn't agree with a gay couple getting married, they cannot refuse service for that reason. Of course, during the business transaction they are by all means allowed to say "I don't agree with this". And nobody can stop that.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
So long as they do not actively advocate for violence against those they protest about, they should be free to spew whatever hate they please.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Seamrog
Are you familliar with WBC, sounds like you are describing them?..the epitome of uglyness and hate.
Yet you would agree that the government should not forbid them to speak, yes?
Right, because we recognize that the freedom of speech is essential to a free society, no matter how distasteful we may find some examples of it.
Why not? People have the freedom of association, the freedom of religion, and the freedom to own property. If one does not feel right in participating in or supporting a gay wedding, or a klan rally, or an NRA convention, why should the state force them to?
The way I see it, in a free society sometimes we have to tolerate behaviors we find distasteful in order to maintain a free society.
So if the law said you couldn't say certain things, you'd be okay with that since that's the law?
A Jewish person should be forced to service a Klan rally?
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
If the Jewish person ran a deli and a KKK person wanted them to cater a KKK event, the Jewish businessman cannot discriminate against the KKK and refuse to cater the event. The Jewish businessman serves the public.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
The law is: If you own a business that serves the public, you are not allowed to discriminate. Freedom of expression is fine, but that freedom does not give you authority to discriminate.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
100% agreed. People should be free to say whatever they please. However, even if (to use the wedding example again) a business doesn't agree with a gay couple getting married, they cannot refuse service for that reason. Of course, during the business transaction they are by all means allowed to say "I don't agree with this". And nobody can stop that.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
So long as they do not actively advocate for violence against those they protest about, they should be free to spew whatever hate they please.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Seamrog
Are you familliar with WBC, sounds like you are describing them?..the epitome of uglyness and hate.
Yet you would agree that the government should not forbid them to speak, yes?
Right, because we recognize that the freedom of speech is essential to a free society, no matter how distasteful we may find some examples of it.
Why not? People have the freedom of association, the freedom of religion, and the freedom to own property. If one does not feel right in participating in or supporting a gay wedding, or a klan rally, or an NRA convention, why should the state force them to?
The way I see it, in a free society sometimes we have to tolerate behaviors we find distasteful in order to maintain a free society.
So if the law said you couldn't say certain things, you'd be okay with that since that's the law?
A Jewish person should be forced to service a Klan rally?
But that sets a dangerous precedent. I could, by those rules, refuse to serve someone Christian because I find their beliefs regarding homosexuality morally reprehensible.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
If the Jewish person ran a deli and a KKK person wanted them to cater a KKK event, the Jewish businessman cannot discriminate against the KKK and refuse to cater the event. The Jewish businessman serves the public.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
The law is: If you own a business that serves the public, you are not allowed to discriminate. Freedom of expression is fine, but that freedom does not give you authority to discriminate.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
100% agreed. People should be free to say whatever they please. However, even if (to use the wedding example again) a business doesn't agree with a gay couple getting married, they cannot refuse service for that reason. Of course, during the business transaction they are by all means allowed to say "I don't agree with this". And nobody can stop that.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
So long as they do not actively advocate for violence against those they protest about, they should be free to spew whatever hate they please.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Seamrog
Are you familliar with WBC, sounds like you are describing them?..the epitome of uglyness and hate.
Yet you would agree that the government should not forbid them to speak, yes?
Right, because we recognize that the freedom of speech is essential to a free society, no matter how distasteful we may find some examples of it.
Why not? People have the freedom of association, the freedom of religion, and the freedom to own property. If one does not feel right in participating in or supporting a gay wedding, or a klan rally, or an NRA convention, why should the state force them to?
The way I see it, in a free society sometimes we have to tolerate behaviors we find distasteful in order to maintain a free society.
So if the law said you couldn't say certain things, you'd be okay with that since that's the law?
A Jewish person should be forced to service a Klan rally?
See, I just can't help but disagree with that concept. The Jewish man should be able to refuse to support a Klan rally. It's one thing if he refused to serve white Anglo Saxon protestants in his deli, sure, but he should have every right to refuse to support the action of a Klan rally. He's refusing to support a behavior--an event, because he finds it morally reprehensible, not people because of their color.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
How does someone have the right to have someone else serve them?
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
But that sets a dangerous precedent. I could, by those rules, refuse to serve someone Christian because I find their beliefs regarding homosexuality morally reprehensible.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
If the Jewish person ran a deli and a KKK person wanted them to cater a KKK event, the Jewish businessman cannot discriminate against the KKK and refuse to cater the event. The Jewish businessman serves the public.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
The law is: If you own a business that serves the public, you are not allowed to discriminate. Freedom of expression is fine, but that freedom does not give you authority to discriminate.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
100% agreed. People should be free to say whatever they please. However, even if (to use the wedding example again) a business doesn't agree with a gay couple getting married, they cannot refuse service for that reason. Of course, during the business transaction they are by all means allowed to say "I don't agree with this". And nobody can stop that.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
So long as they do not actively advocate for violence against those they protest about, they should be free to spew whatever hate they please.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Seamrog
Are you familliar with WBC, sounds like you are describing them?..the epitome of uglyness and hate.
Yet you would agree that the government should not forbid them to speak, yes?
Right, because we recognize that the freedom of speech is essential to a free society, no matter how distasteful we may find some examples of it.
Why not? People have the freedom of association, the freedom of religion, and the freedom to own property. If one does not feel right in participating in or supporting a gay wedding, or a klan rally, or an NRA convention, why should the state force them to?
The way I see it, in a free society sometimes we have to tolerate behaviors we find distasteful in order to maintain a free society.
So if the law said you couldn't say certain things, you'd be okay with that since that's the law?
A Jewish person should be forced to service a Klan rally?
See, I just can't help but disagree with that concept. The Jewish man should be able to refuse to support a Klan rally. It's one thing if he refused to serve white Anglo Saxon protestants in his deli, sure, but he should have every right to refuse to support the action of a Klan rally. He's refusing to support a behavior--an event, because he finds it morally reprehensible, not people because of their color.
Hoffman further explained why she offered her donation and apology to a Christian family that doesn't agree with her lesbian lifestyle in a Monday interview on the "The Jeff Adams Show."
She explained that even though the O'Connors hold a different worldview than she does, she knows that as a small business owner, there are certain events that she does not want her business to take part in and should have the right to refuse offering service in those situations.
"My girlfriend and I are small business owners and we think that there is a difference between operating in a public marketspace and then attaching the name of your business to a private event," Hoffman, who runs a kettle corn stand for various festivals and carnivals, explained. "If we were asked to set up an event at an anti-gay marriage rally, we would have to decline."
She added that forcing businesses to provide services for private events that they don't believe to be morally right, is wrong.
"We just feel like that is our right to decide what events our business associated with and we feel that the right to chose what private events you associate your business with is a right that should be extended to everyone, even people we don't agree with," Hoffman asserted. "That is just kind of how freedom works. That's really what got us talking about the pizzeria was thinking about this from business owner to business owner."
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Seamrog
Fine, then don't have a business that has anything to do with weddings and you won't have to deal with it. Your choice.
Don't you just find the concept that a person must bow to the will of others under force of government or lose their livelihood a teeny bit concerning? Just a little bit?
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: NavyDoc
There are tricky little ways around issues like that. The Jewish deli owner could simply say he doesn't have the capacity to serve an event that large and suggest a larger deli down the street. It would be pretty difficult for the KKK people to prove that the Jewish deli owner didn't have the capacity to serve them, and it would be a long and expensive legal battle not worth fighting.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Seamrog
Fine, then don't have a business that has anything to do with weddings and you won't have to deal with it. Your choice.
Don't you just find the concept that a person must bow to the will of others under force of government or lose their livelihood a teeny bit concerning? Just a little bit?
Do I find it concerning that people have to follow our laws? No.
Do I find it concerning that people have the freedom to pick and choose the businesses they will own, depending on what they want to do and who they want to work with? No.
originally posted by: Seamrog
originally posted by: NavyDoc
How does someone have the right to have someone else serve them?
This is why SR is a good little leftist.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Seamrog
a reply to: kaylaluv
Exactly - homosexualist tyranny.
OP - be sure to ignore this response.
Well, my friend, the pendulum is swinging. America has been under a Christian tyranny for many, many years.
And if it swings back? Would you then be okay with the government forcing people to do stuff they don't want to do? That's the problem--the pendulum always swings the other way and if we are always just using it to get some sort of "payback" we never get anywhere.
If you call me a leftist again, I'll report you. I find the term insulting. Thank you.
originally posted by: Seamrog
originally posted by: NavyDoc
How does someone have the right to have someone else serve them?
This is why SR is a good little leftist.
Whether you want to or not, you will be MADE TO CARE. You will be MADE TO OBEY.
I don't think there is any just anti-discrimination law.
Leftists want the government to do their dirty work for them.....
....when it suits them.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Seamrog
a reply to: kaylaluv
Exactly - homosexualist tyranny.
OP - be sure to ignore this response.
Well, my friend, the pendulum is swinging. America has been under a Christian tyranny for many, many years.
And if it swings back? Would you then be okay with the government forcing people to do stuff they don't want to do? That's the problem--the pendulum always swings the other way and if we are always just using it to get some sort of "payback" we never get anywhere.
I think overall, we are evolving away from antiquated Christian conservatism. Christian conservatives are in the minority, and subsequent generations are becoming more and more moderate. A thousand years from now - maybe Christians (or some other conservative religious group) will be in control again. But I am worried about now - not a thousand years from now.