It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MrsNonSpecific
a reply to: nerbot
Jamie was in full time work, she has paid some of her dues. At this moment in time, in order for her to look after her baby she needs help, but putting her in an empty flat with nothing in it is not an acceptable environment for someone to have to cope with whilst having just given birth.
originally posted by: MrsNonSpecific
a reply to: eletheia
She left the job. She does not have statutory maternity cover as she is no longer in the employ of them.
originally posted by: sussy
At 18 I left home to get married. I had a mortgage at 19 and had worked since I was 15. I saved up for all those things i needed to call a home and it took me 15 years on catologues to buy the things I needed. I had my 1st child by 20, 2 more followed by the time I was 25. I had lino on the floor and a second hand electric oven. An outside loo and none of these padded nappies you just throw away. Yet it sickens me today how bloody easy these kids want it. When they have done real hardship, like starving as there is only 1 wage going into the house, or no tv then and only then will they get any pity or empathy from me. It's the expectation from people like yourself who feel the council/government owe them something. If you haven't PAID into the system why the hell she you have free hand outs. The kitty/piggy bank can only provide so much. Indeed she is living in a home that costs 400 a month, are you paying that cash? no we are
so i'm sorry if I'm having a rant..
I'M INTITILLED TO
originally posted by: MrsNonSpecific
This post was to express at my shock at the standard of accommodation given to a vulnerable new born baby.
The whole point of these flats is to create a stable existence in which someone can move on from, and to move past their situation they now find themselves in. These are deemed as vulnerable people, and the government is responsible for them, hence welfare and social services.
The council should not be deeming an empty shell of a flat with no flooring, cooker, fridge, freezer, washing machine, or even a microwave. No provision for storing or preparing food as an acceptable place to put a new born baby. Their duty is to the new born, not the mother.
originally posted by: MrsNonSpecific
Most of the government's money in their budget goes on pensions, not on social care for those that have found themselves in circumstances that they need help getting themselves through.
originally posted by: eletheia
Pensioners are not getting *benefits* they get *pensions* which they earned
and paid for during their working lives .
originally posted by: nerbot
originally posted by: eletheia
Pensioners are not getting *benefits* they get *pensions* which they earned
and paid for during their working lives .
NOT NECESSARILY TRUE.
Do you realise that someone who spends part or all of their time on benefits still gets a state pension?
How can they have earned it when all they have done is be supported by the state?
Scrounging has to stop. Take away the benefits and people will actually have to THINK about their place in society rather than take a free back seat.
originally posted by: nerbot
NOT NECESSARILY TRUE.
Do you realise that someone who spends part or all of their time on benefits still gets a state pension?
How can they have earned it when all they have done is be supported by the state?
Scrounging has to stop. Take away the benefits and people will actually have to THINK about their place in society rather than take a free back seat.
originally posted by: eletheia
originally posted by: nerbot
NOT NECESSARILY TRUE.
Do you realise that someone who spends part or all of their time on benefits still gets a state pension?
How can they have earned it when all they have done is be supported by the state?
Yes I do ... and pension payments are not all equal either. I with my
employment history get the full pension. However I know of one case and
there must be many others where the pension earned by someone is less
than the government states is a required income.
This person getting a couple of £'s a week less than me applied for 'benefits'
and received them!! No longer required to pay council tax or dental
treatment and other perks amounting to over £100 per month.
So from being about £10 a month worse off than me .... she is now over
£100 better off than me!!!
*HOW CAN THAT BE FAIR ?*
Scrounging has to stop. Take away the benefits and people will actually have to THINK about their place in society rather than take a free back seat.
originally posted by: abe froman
originally posted by: MrsNonSpecific
Most of the government's money in their budget goes on pensions, not on social care for those that have found themselves in circumstances that they need help getting themselves through.
How dare the Government give money to people that worked all their life, instead of ignorant chavs living on welfare, filling up council flats and breeding like cockroaches.
originally posted by: nonspecific
So is your issue with the question of what a local council deems acceptable for a vunerable person and newborn baby can recive as a start in life or that you feel cheated personally because after towing the line for most of your life those that have in your eyes not done are in the same or better position?
They seem to be 2 seperate issues IMO.
originally posted by: sussy
a reply to: MrsNonSpecific
Something has just hit me between the eyes. Your young lady would of have had to have a midwife whom would of called into her flat and checked it over for her and her baby if she went straight there from hospital. The midwife would of made calls in the 1st two weeks of having the baby. The midwife has to check if the home enviroment is safe for that child like heating etc. You can ask the midwife to come back and help with social services to improve conditions.