It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There isn't a "war on Christianity", but people *are* getting tired of so-called "Christians" taking the bits and pieces of a religion they belong to, and ditching the rest. You just can't do that and not expect some backlash.
...Bilbo was also a virulent racist. “I call on every red-blooded white man to use any means to keep the n-word away from the polls,” Bilbo proclaimed during his successful reelection campaign in 1946. He was a proud member of the Ku Klux Klan, telling Meet the Press that same year that “[n]o man can leave the Klan. He takes an oath not to do that. Once a Ku Klux, always a Ku Klux.” During a filibuster of an anti-lynching bill, Bilbo claimed that the bill...
...will open the floodgates of hell in the South. Raping, mobbing, lynching, race riots, and crime will be increased a thousandfold; and upon your garments and the garments of those who are responsible for the passage of the measure will be the blood of the raped and outraged daughters of Dixie, as well as the blood of the perpetrators of these crimes that the red-blooded Anglo-Saxon White Southern men will not tolerate.
For Senator Bilbo, however, racism was more that just an ideology, it was a sincerely held religious belief...
Either Jesus is a moral and divine example to live by or he isn't. The entire term "Christian" was to mean "Christ-like" I thought? What about all those WWJD bumper stickers and t-shirts? I'll tell you what Jesus would do -- he'd bake that gay couple a cake.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
I'm not Christian - but I have always understood that to be Christian was to be tolerant, patient, giving and kind
Nonsense. He makes films. He provides a product. He makes a lot of different films of different types. He would have a moral objection for making a film of a certain type and he has every right to refuse to do so. A person should have the right to not do something he finds abhorrent.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: NavyDoc
Nonsense. He makes films. He provides a product. He makes a lot of different films of different types. He would have a moral objection for making a film of a certain type and he has every right to refuse to do so. A person should have the right to not do something he finds abhorrent.
Of course the photographer can make a policy not to do nude photography or any photography of offensive nature. So that will be out for ANYBODY who wants that.
However if he provides photography service for weddings then he will HAVE to provide that to ANYONE regardless of their sexual orientation, race or beliefs.
We're back to the film?
There is something called Artistic License. You can suggest ideas to a Cake Maker on how you want your cake decorated, but she does not have to accept your idea. It is her art. You can't tell her how to do her art.
She's still required to provide the cake though.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Annee
We're back to the film?
There is something called Artistic License. You can suggest ideas to a Cake Maker on how you want your cake decorated, but she does not have to accept your idea. It is her art. You can't tell her how to do her art.
She's still required to provide the cake though.
Right. I was just replying to his post. The point is that if the photographer offers to do wedding photos, he will still be required to do so regardless of sexual orientation.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
On the other hand - maybe he really is just that stupid :-)
Voted NO on prohibiting job discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Voted YES on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage.
NO on enforcing against anti-gay hate crimes
Yes. There are limits though. Photog would not be required to film nudity, unless it was agreed upon in the contract.
You can't force a cake maker to write something that is offensive to them.
According to the Start Debating – Stop Hating website, a number of Republican congresspeople and high ranking officials have signed on to the pledge that they will stand by the Family Research Council, Concerned Women for America, American Family Association and other groups identified as anti-gay hate groups.
They include: U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Members Who Endorse SPLC-Designated Hate Groups:
Speaker-designate John Boehner – (R-OH);
Majority Leader-elect Eric Cantor – (R-VA);
Rep. Michele Bachmann – (R-MN);
Rep. John Carter – Secretary, House Republican Conference (R-TX);
Rep. John Fleming, M.D. – (R-LA);
Rep. Trent Franks – (R-AZ);
Rep. Louie Gohmert – (R-TX);
Rep. Jeb Henserling – (R-TX);
Rep. Jim Jordan – (R-OH);
Rep. Steve King – (R-IA);
Rep. Donald Manzullo – (R-IL);
Rep. Kevin McCarthy – (R-CA);
Rep.-elect Alan Nunnelee – (R-MS);
Rep. Mike Pence – (R-IN);
Rep. Joe Pitts – (R-PA);
Rep. Peter Roskam – (R-IL);
Rep. Steve Scalise – (R-LA);
Rep. Lamar Smith – (R-TX);
Rep. Fred Upton – (R-MI).
GOP hopefuls back Gov. Pence on Indiana religious freedom law
“This law simply says the government has to have a level of burden to be able to establish that there’s been some kind of discrimination,” the former Florida governor said. “We’re going to need this. This is really an important value for our country … where you can respect and be tolerant of people’s lifestyles, but allow for people of faith to be able to exercise theirs.”
onpolitics.usatoday.com...
In the uproar over the recently passed Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), defenders of the bill like Indiana Gov. Pence are trying to hide behind the argument that the law "simply mirrors" the federal RFRA Sen. Ted Kennedy wrote and I introduced as a Congressman in 1993. That may be true only if you're using a Funhouse mirror.
talkingpointsmemo.com...
I have been Christian. And while some are as you might expect, they tend to be the few in my experience.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
One thing I know for sure - there is a group in this country calling themselves Christian that are hell-bent on having everything their way. They are working against secularism precisely because secularism won't award them special privileges, they say they are for less government and for supporting our individual right to do whatever the hell we say makes us feel right with God, even if that actually causes other people distress
They want to pretend that the old days are behind us and that now all they're doing is fighting persecution
As I was saying to Mystik, these aren't a people that are Christ-like. They act as if they wrote the Bible and own the copyright - and that the rest of us don't understand Jesus
What a crock
He's not stupid.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: Annee
I so do know what you mean :-)
I'm just enough of a Pollyanna to believe that most people - in their heart - are truly good
Still, I'm just cynical enough to feel that when we get into groups and pick leaders it's nothing but Lord of the Flies - all the way down