It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crazyewok
But I think the USA should loan us a F-18 or F-22 Squadron or two until you deliver our F-35's as you kinda left us hanging there
originally posted by: yuppa
41 ships so 80-120 harpoons will do the trick to sink them all. Then if they try to invade sink the transposrts at speed with Allied naval help from the US navy.if asked by the brits to help.
originally posted by: stumason
originally posted by: crazyewok
But I think the USA should loan us a F-18 or F-22 Squadron or two until you deliver our F-35's as you kinda left us hanging there
And where would they fly from, Crazey? the F-22 is simply not carrier capable and the F-18 can't take off from our new carriers as we have no catapults to launch them.
originally posted by: stumason
originally posted by: yuppa
41 ships so 80-120 harpoons will do the trick to sink them all. Then if they try to invade sink the transposrts at speed with Allied naval help from the US navy.if asked by the brits to help.
And of those 41 "ships", only half a dozen are actually Frigates or larger. Even then, they are so poorly maintained that they sink at dock!
originally posted by: crazyewok
That wonderfull RAF base we built on the Islands.
originally posted by: crazyewok
Anyway if the yanks leant us F18 then they have there own aircraft carries,
originally posted by: crazyewok
Not that we would need them seeing as the Argentinian airforce is rusting 70's crap.
originally posted by: stumason
originally posted by: crazyewok
That wonderfull RAF base we built on the Islands.
The one we already have the far more capable Typhoons based from?
originally posted by: crazyewok
Anyway if the yanks leant us F18 then they have there own aircraft carries,
Is it a buy 10, get a free carrier deal then? Usually, the Yanks don't give away Carriers with purchasers of the F-18!
originally posted by: crazyewok
Not that we would need them seeing as the Argentinian airforce is rusting 70's crap.
Exactly - and these "new" planes are no better and barely have the range or armament to be any sort of threat.
originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: crazyewok
Ah, I see! It depends who is in the White House - Regan did offer support last time but was rebuffed by Maggie as she felt it was important we do it alone, but I suspect Obama will not lift a finger.
I still believe, despite the headlines, that we are more than capable of defending the Falklands with what we have now, much less what we have coming down the pipeline which is just going to blow anything the Argentines have clean away.
originally posted by: johnwick
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
originally posted by: johnwick
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
a reply to: DAZ21
Russia is right. The Crimeans DID vote for independence from Kiev. They have every right to go their own way after the west showed the way with the forced dismemberment of Serbia and the creation of Kosovo.
To be honest I wouldn't be upset if the Ruskies station their army in Argentina, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. I'm British too, I just think we and the west have pushed against Russia and its sphere of influence (through coloured revolution, Stratfor and NATO) too far
The vote was extremely questionable.
It went down way too fast had no outside oversight etc...
For all the world actually knows it was a complete fraud.
I can't say it was, as I don't have any proof.
But the only proof it was legit is what the Russian gov says.
So I call it 50/50 at best.
But the whole of Ukraine belonged to Moscow, not just Crimea. Lots of Ukranians want out from fighting Russia, but Britain and USA knows what's best for them. We use Ukraine like we used the Germans in the 30's, to weaken the USSR. Like for Germany then, I expect this won't work out well for the Ukranian people, but British and US politicians don't care about the deaths do they?
Moscow only had Ukraine because they invaded it in WW2.
You know like Poland easy Germany etc...
It was not Russia's to take or give.
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
Russia controlled Ukraine for hundreds of years. Ukraine has always belonged to Russia, just like Scotland belongs to England
..... just like Scotland belongs to England