It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Iraq's key oil infrastructure suffered five attacks in 24 hours after a voice identified as Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden ordered followers to sabotage the west's key oil supplies.
An oil ministry spokesman condemned the upsurge in "terrorist acts" which he says are depriving Iraqis of essential fuel and the country of desperately needed export revenues.
There were two blasts on pipelines Saturday and three late Friday, all of them in restive Sunni Arab areas around the capital or in north-central Iraq, officials say.
In the first of Saturday's attacks, saboteurs blew up a section of the pipeline feeding oil from the northern Kirkuk fields to the distribution hub of Baiji, an oil facilities protection officer says.
The section near Fatha, 85 kilometres west of the oil city of Kirkuk, had already been hit on Friday, virtually eliminating its flow.
An hour later a second blast hit the pipeline linking Baiji with Baghdad's Daura refinery, network director Majid Mamnum says.
Iraq oil facilities targeted after bin Laden message
Originally posted by Johnny Redburn
Considering that there is no known links between OBL and these resistance groups how do simply say that one or the other is responsible?
"The same evening, near Baiji, saboteurs struck another pipeline supplying refined products from the refinery there to storage reservoirs around Baghdad."
That attack was claimed by an Islamic militant group loyal to bin Laden, the Al Qaeda Organisation of Mesopotamia, in a leaflet distributed in Baiji.
The leaflet said sabotage had been carried out in response to Thursday's Internet message from the Al Qaeda "supreme commander".
Thats quite a substantial amount considering OBL only called for "terrorist" operations to be directed towards the Oil infrastructure 24 hours previously.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by Johnny Redburn
Considering that there is no known links between OBL and these resistance groups how do simply say that one or the other is responsible?
How do you figure there are no links?
"The same evening, near Baiji, saboteurs struck another pipeline supplying refined products from the refinery there to storage reservoirs around Baghdad."
That attack was claimed by an Islamic militant group loyal to bin Laden, the Al Qaeda Organisation of Mesopotamia, in a leaflet distributed in Baiji.
The leaflet said sabotage had been carried out in response to Thursday's Internet message from the Al Qaeda "supreme commander".
Originally posted by jsobecky
Why the emphasis on the word "terrorists"?
Originally posted by MERC
Originally posted by jsobecky
Why the emphasis on the word "terrorists"?
Why ask a question you already know the answer too?
Originally posted by sturod84
i dont understand how this considered "terror" when attacking oil pipeline has nothing to do with inflicting fear into the hearts of the populaiton. this is a percision hammer strike against the occupants.