It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I would sue Hillary Clinton personally over the deaths at Benghazi if.....

page: 5
12
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
...... I were a family member of one of the fallen, and it can be proven that their lives were lost because of some miscommunication due to her not using the proper government channels of communication or that she was hiding something on purpose that she didn't want known. Our Freedom of Information access regarding Benghazi was compromised and/or delayed because of it.

This is another reason we need to get to the bottom of why she was not using proper government channels.


beating this dead horse again...it was already proven many, many times that Clinton had nothing to do with their deaths....try and come back to the real world




posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: jimmyx

No. Nothing has been totally proven. We don't have all OUR communications. FOIA has been stalled and ignored because of her use of personal email and private server during this period of time.

This is not a dead horse no matter what some think and want to believe. There is more and it will be revealed as this investigation goes deeper. These people in this administration are back door lawyers and underhanded politicians with a track record of lying, stalling, obfuscating, and denying. They have muddied the ability of The People's representatives to do a timely and thorough job. But, we will see just how muddy it is.



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 04:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: jimmyx

No. Nothing has been totally proven.


Remove the "totally" part and you start to approach reality.



This is not a dead horse no matter what some think and want to believe.


After 30+ separate investigations and hearings on Benghazi all coming to the surprising conclusion that it was not Hillary Clinton's fault....Yes this is a "Dead Horse"...or more accurately a rotting carcass of a horse that the GOP continue to try and sell as a dead sasquatch.



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 05:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: EternalSolace
denying permission to operational forces within 30 minutes of the area from rescuing them?


Care to show us a valid source showing exactly where and what kind of troops were 30 minutes away?


Offici al: US Special Forces team wasn't allowed to fly to Benghazi during attack



A small team of Special Forces operatives was ready to fly from Tripoli to Benghazi last year after Libyan insurgents attacked the U.S. mission there, but was told it was not authorized to board the flight by regional military commanders, according to a career State Department official scheduled to testify before Congress on Wednesday.


It's around 635 miles from Tripoli to Benghazi. A C-130 cruises at around 336MPH. That team could have made it in just under 2 hours. Okay, thirty minutes is wrong. There was a team less than two hours away...



posted on Mar, 10 2015 @ 11:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: EternalSolace


It's around 635 miles from Tripoli to Benghazi. A C-130 cruises at around 336MPH. That team could have made it in just under 2 hours. Okay, thirty minutes is wrong. There was a team less than two hours away...


Incorrect. this has been thoroughly investigated multiple times and everyone involved was debriefed from top to bottom.

The Tripoli security guys were 3 guys with nothing more than side-arms..

They were guarding Tripoli's Embassy personnel and requested permission to leave them to join the fight.

They were denied permission because there was the possibility that the Tripoli embassy personnel might be targeted as well!

AND the plane they wanted to get on DID NOT ARRIVE until after the fight was over...by a couple of hours..

It was the right call to tell them to remain in Tripoli...the OTHER Libyan embassy...while Benghazi was under attack..
cuz they wouldn't have arrived in time...the plane they wanted to get on arrived hours after the fight, they would have left their assigned Embassy personnel unprotected and they weren't armed for the fight.

AND it was Military Command that told them to stay put...not the State Department.



posted on Mar, 10 2015 @ 11:48 AM
link   
a reply to: EternalSolace

Just to fully clarify how your claim is BS...



Military officers testified that there was no "stand-down order" that held back military assets that could have saved the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans killed at a diplomatic outpost and CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya. Their testimony undercut the contention of Republican lawmakers.

The "stand-down" theory centers on a Special Operations team — a detachment leader, a medic, a communications expert and a weapons operator with his foot in a cast — that was stopped from flying from Tripoli to Benghazi after the attacks of Sept. 11-12, 2012, had ended. Instead, it was instructed to help protect and care for those being evacuated from Benghazi and from the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli.

The senior military officer who issued the instruction to "remain in place" and the detachment leader who received it said it was the right decision and has been widely mischaracterized. The order was to remain in Tripoli and protect some three dozen embassy personnel rather than fly to Benghazi some 600 miles away after all Americans there would have been evacuated. And the medic is credited with saving the life of an evacuee from the attacks.


And not just the Brass...Here is the guy that the GOP was touting as receiving the "Stand Down" order...



The Special Operations detachment leader's name is omitted from the testimony transcript, but he previously has been identified as Lt. Col. S.E. Gibson. More than a year-and-a-half later, Gibson, who is now a colonel, agreed that staying in Tripoli was the best decision.

"It was not a stand-down order," he testified in March. "It was not, 'Hey, time for everybody to go to bed.' It was, you know, 'Don't go. Don't get on that plane. Remain in place.'"

"Initially, I was angry," Gibson said. "A tactical commander doesn't like to have those decisions taken away from him. But then once I digested it a little bit, then I realized, OK, maybe there was something else that was going on. Maybe I'm needed here for something else."


AP NEWS LINK:
abcnews.go.com...



posted on Mar, 10 2015 @ 06:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: EternalSolace
It's around 635 miles from Tripoli to Benghazi. A C-130 cruises at around 336MPH. That team could have made it in just under 2 hours. Okay, thirty minutes is wrong. There was a team less than two hours away...


First they had to pre flight check the plane, start it up, load it then take off, fly to Benghazi, then land at the airport, get transport and drive to the location.... so more like 3+ hours than 2.... if the troops were at the airport, if a plane was available and ready.

But as we see it was not available.
edit on 10-3-2015 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 12:24 PM
link   
Trey Gowdy has announced that: "Our Committee Doesn't Have the Power' to Seize Hillary's Email Server".

The Benghazi investigation is probably cooked. Hillary is a lawyer. She knew what she was doing. We will probably never ever be able to unravel this thing for the American people.

Article and video here


(CNSNews.com) - The House Select Committee on Benghazi will not subpoena Hillary Clinton's email server, because it can't, committee chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Wednesday. "Well our committee doesn't have the power -- under our rules, we don't have the power to seize a personal property like that.



posted on Mar, 11 2015 @ 12:37 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords



"After careful deliberation and exhausting our other options, The Associated Press is taking the necessary legal steps to gain access to these important documents, which will shed light on actions by the State Department and former Secretary Clinton, a presumptive 2016 presidential candidate, during some of the most significant issues of our time," said Karen Kaiser, AP's general counsel.


AP sues State Department, seeking access to Clinton records
edit on 11-3-2015 by greencmp because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join