It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: my1percent
a reply to: Psynic
I agree it's a bit sus hey
A towlette lol woops is a sort of hand towel used for cleaning your hands is it not?
Maybe better off ignoring that sort of stuff and not posting yeah
1%
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: drock905
a reply to: Metallicus
Yeah, it's kind of amazing that they have found 0 pieces of wreckage in 1 year. It would only seen possible if Jeff Wises conclusion is accurate... The plane went north.
they have zero evidence of ANYTHING happening after they lost contact...zilch, nada, nothing. it's all been speculation.
Not quite.
They do have some radar telemetry.
The last fix had the plane clear of the Straights of Malacca and headed for Kazakhstan.
i.dailymail.co.uk...
According to Inmarsat's 'secret formula', it then did a U-turn and headed off to the middle of nowhere.
I heard that too, but were they able to positively ID that particular radar signature, as being the actual airliner?....if I'm wrong and they did, then I missed it.
Well that's where the mystery lies.
IF as widely reported MH370 was sighted by "Military Radar" at that point and WASN'T identified, what's the point of military radar if NOT to allow for the interception of unidentified aircraft?
In all likelihood military radar was already aware of something being 'up' when the squawk started back at IGARI where MH370 went dark.
The question then becomes; was MH370 intercepted, post 9/11 protocol followed and the aircraft shot out of the sky?
If that's not a good reason for a cover-up I don't know what is?
A) deprive the hijackers of the headline
B) minimize the industry's public relations disaster
C) dissuade terrorists from further attempts
D) neutralize political ramifications of innocent foreign nationals being sacrificed
E) keep the money rolling in
Then Sir Tim calls BS on the Southern Indian Ocean and the whole autopilot/asphyxiation nonsense, which brings us back to the Northern Arc, where the plane's last heading would have taken it.
Did it make it to a terrorist held territory or was it intercepted?
originally posted by: Psynic
Yes. Conceal a hijacking.
Why?
To deprive the hijackers of the headlines that were their goal.
Pretty simple really.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Psynic
Yes. Conceal a hijacking.
Why?
To deprive the hijackers of the headlines that were their goal.
Pretty simple really.
nothing prevents individuals who had people on the plane from speaking to the media about the plane missing. Its going to get media coverage. Secondly hijackings usually revolve around the individuals wanting something in return.
Are you aware of any commercial hijackings that were successfully kept secret? Ive checked and have not found any.
originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
a reply to: Psynic
Where is this theory of components of WMD on board a commercial flight coming from?
It would be near impossible to smuggle anything that couldn't be put in a suitcase on an airplane unless it was privately owned. We know this plane was not privately owned.
Customs throughout the world have laws about manifests matching actual cargo. According to the manifest the most dangerous items in cargo were certified packaged correctly lithium batteries.
The flight destination was Malaysia. Why would anyone be sending components of WMD there?