Britain first activists chase Muslim pedophiles off the streets of Newcastle

It's heartbreaking to think of this disgusting child abuse pedophilia being past off as "normal" within this religion... Very sad and very disturbing.

And that woman in this video has a valid point, why were they not arrested for promoting child pornography?

Anyway, I am absolutely disgusted and appalled that this is allowed to happen in any country, it's beyond sick!

If this is the wrong forum for this, please feel free to move it, Mods.

a reply to: Bloodydagger


It's the fault of Christians from what some of the people here on ats has been saying lately.

Anyway this guy is a disgusting pig for trying to justify it by saying it's okay if the girl acts mature, freaking pig scum.

So because he had a book of Hadiths (presumably for sale) he is a Muslim pedophile?

How is it child pornography? If it is true then it is simply history. If it is false then who is the victim?

That said I doubt he is the most qualified person to argue with that lady about Islam on the street, lol.

a reply to: Bloodydagger

Wow she's a bigot. In the middle ages girls could marry at 12. And it wasn't unusual if there future husband had money to live with them prior to that as long as a dowry was paid to the family. It was a different time with different values.

She's attacking that poor man because she doesn't like his religion even went as far as telling him he shouldn't be here. I think people like her is why our society is so screwed up. If she doesn't like Islam than she doesn't have to become a Muslim but she has no right to tell others they can't or put them down for doing so.

This disgusts me how people get indignant or think there better than someone else. We all are human and shocker go back far enough were all related not the way you should treat your family.

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Bloodydagger

Wow she's a bigot. In the middle ages girls could marry at 12.

You don't see that as being wrong? If a 12 year old married and had sex with a man in his 40s or 50s? (example)

Its wrong, period.

That lady was no bigot, she was speaking the truth.

Condone this form of pedophilia then you might as well condone ALL pedophilia. Its all the same. History be damned.

originally posted by: Elton
So because he had a book of Hadiths (presumably for sale) he is a Muslim pedophile?

How is it child pornography? If it is true then it is simply history. If it is false then who is the victim?

That said I doubt he is the most qualified person to argue with that lady about Islam on the street, lol.

I see what your saying about the book but the thing that really set her and many others off is the way he justifies it by saying if she acts mature then it's okay in his eyes.

Sorry but how is that different than religons on the west. Paedophilia is rampant in the churches . Look what momons do want what they think should be acceptable.

a reply to: freedomSlave

Pedophile priests are not Christians, because they are violating prime precepts of the New Testament by their actions, regularly. See Luke 17:1-2. Islam, on the other hand, celebrates Mohammed's raping of Aisha, repeatedly, and uses it to condone such actions to this day. Huge difference.

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
History be damned.

I don't like it much myself, but different times have different sensibilities...

Apparently young people marriage was common and allowed for some time...
Lame Wiki Link

The first recorded age-of-consent law dates back 800 years. In 1275, in England, as part of the rape law, a statute, Westminster 1, made it a misdemeanor to "ravish" a "maiden within age", whether with or without her consent. The phrase "within age" was interpreted by jurist Sir Edward Coke as meaning the age of marriage, which at the time was 12 years of age.

In the 12th century, the jurist Gratian, an influential founder of Canon law in medieval Europe, accepted the age of puberty for marriage to be between 12 and 14, but acknowledged consent to be meaningful if the children were older than 7. There were authorities with a claim that consent could take place earlier. Marriage would then be valid as long as neither of the two parties annulled the marital agreement before reaching puberty, or if they had already consummated the marriage.

It should be noted that Judges honored marriages based on mutual consent at ages younger than 7, in spite of what Gratian had said; there are recorded marriages of 2 and 3 year olds.

Crazy world!

Muhammad died 1400 years ago.

The angry lady is prob an agent of UKIP also.

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Bloodydagger

Wow she's a bigot. In the middle ages girls could marry at 12.

You don't see that as being wrong? If a 12 year old married and had sex with a man in his 40s or 50s? (example)

Its wrong, period.

That lady was no bigot, she was speaking the truth.

Condone this form of pedophilia then you might as well condone ALL pedophilia. Its all the same. History be damned.

Wasn't pedophilia back than our values have changed what was acceptable than we consider wrong now. And just so you know I wasn't talking about Muslims when I said girls could marry at 12. Age of consent was between 6 and 8 depending on the area this was Brittish common law so that woman can attempt to throw stones however her relatives did 5 he same thing.

We can't try to place our values on people that lived 100s of years ago things change laws change. By age 12 girls could marry and immediately started trying to have kids since mortality rates were so high. Child bearing years were considered between 12 and 18. So she wasn't telling the truth she attacked that poor man's religion because she believes her beliefs are superior. And i take it back a he's not a big got she's a racist.

PS thus is nothing more than a Muslim hit piece they should be ashamed you aren't going to change people beliefs by attacking them. This is a sad testimony on our society.

a reply to: dragonridr

If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?

I can't believe anyone could make excuses for these scum. If she acts mature? Are you kidding me? Sick individuals.

Why anyone would see that as something that is ok, is beyond me.

originally posted by: PorteurDeMort
Why anyone would see that as something that is ok, is beyond me.

Tell that to your ancestors apparently Britain wad full of pedophiles oddly with the latest news doesn't seem things have changed.

Also seeing a trend people think it's ok to attack Muslims or jews or christians because of there beliefs. There ideas or no more or less important than yours. Welcome to the human race.

People give the reasoning that it was the average life span of the time, roughly 630 A.D.. But girls did not mature faster, their bodies didn't grow faster. People just DIED faster. The human biology other than height and life expectancy has been practically the same for the past 2000 years.

Her body would NOT have been developed, even at 12 (some say 9). Her womb, her hips, her birth canal, the whole system would be under-developed. Muhammad by even today's standards, would be considered a pedophile. Period.

a reply to: dragonridr

We live in 2015 now.

I agree with you OP it's not right. In the States this is called Statutory Rape ( under the age of 18 ) even if the girl is 12 upwards and behaves very mature and consents, it's a no - no.

I have a family member who got pregnant then married and had a baby at 14/15, this was mid 60's ( her husband was 19 though and not a creepy 30 - 40 year old ). Some of these young girls are tricky. Age 0 - 9? 10? etc.; disgusting is all I can say, these are babies. It's a slippery slope.

Jesus never preached such a thing, then again, his mother was 14 and allegedly God impregnated her, she didn't seek it !?!. But, this is not B.C. and they seem to want to bring us back to 2000 years ago and beyond.

I think the woman was right for calling him out on it. jmo of course.

the laws of old times are different it wasent correct me if im wrong the last 100 years that of muturity sexualy... whatever age that was it was fine

the old saying grass of the feild lol

ok all aside tho in modern day it is wrong we know now exacaly how bad this is to the child and twisted it is for a adult to

and if they fallow this model than they are wrong and why not give them old school punishment and stone them to death it be fitting right

last thing to add id think its pritty rare for a girl to be hitting puberty at 9 wtf decent humans would change that damm law 9 ... and they wonder why we hate them