Britain first activists chase Muslim pedophiles off the streets of Newcastle

a reply to: Bloodydagger

Ah yes, the "they're not really christians" argument.

Do you consider Britain Firsters to also be "Not christian?" 'Cause all they are are nationalist hooligans who start street fights. Or do they get a pass from you because of who they start those fights with?

a reply to: Bloodydagger

And that woman in this video has a valid point, why were they not arrested for promoting child pornography?

If they were to do that then they would have to go out and arrest everyone that sells a Bible, Torah and Talmud. In the Talmud it says it ok for a Rabbi to marry a three year old. And these people hand out Bibles? Then why aren't they being arrested for distributing child pornography?

a reply to: thesaneone

Anyway this guy is a disgusting pig for trying to justify it by saying it's okay if the girl acts mature, freaking pig scum.

Back in those days it was common for girls to marry at a young age mainly because people didn't live as long as they do now.

originally posted by: earthling42
a reply to: dragonridr

We live in 2015 now.

And your judging someone that doesnt. In ancient rome marriages could occur at 10. And started to try to have kids as soon as menstruation occurs. This is the point girls can have children. Earlier than that and the hips wouldn't develop and would die in child birth. But our ancestors figured that out quick and made it 12 for marriage. By no coincidence this is when most girls start menstration.

Judging the past based off our morals is wrong.Even worse attacking a religion for something everyone on the planet was doing. You guys can try to claim the moral high ground here but trust me when I say you have child brides in your past. Girls in the middle ages didn't go to school they were taught how to raise kids and take care of a family. As soon as they were old enough to marry the family wad paid a dowry.

Basically the groom had to buy his wife from the father. Now we look at this with horror than it was Normal.Like many things they used to do is no longer moral. To attack a man for his belief under false pretense since it wasn't only Muslims like the woman tries to get you to believe is wrong!!!

And it's sad that even after 100s of years we have people who believe they can judge others or like this woman threaten them humiliate him and than tell him his religion is wrong. In the west this type of behavior is unexceptable. I Say Keep THE Muslim Guy IN THE Country AND Kick Her out.

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: thesaneone

Anyway this guy is a disgusting pig for trying to justify it by saying it's okay if the girl acts mature, freaking pig scum.

Back in those days it was common for girls to marry at a young age mainly because people didn't live as long as they do now.

But we are not in those days anymore and this guy is saying it's okay if the girl is mature, he actually says it was okay and he is not the only sick person who thinks like that.

a reply to: thesaneone

So this guy is an ignorant doofus. Do you imagine that ignorant doofery like this is confined to Islam? 'cause all the non-Muslims who stick their junk in minors would seem to prove otherwise. Including, I imagine, a rather large segment of Britain Firsters.

Also, we've got a merchant being put on the spot on the street by a gang of hostile thugs. Makes for great 'gotcha" video, but it's a pretty poor indicator of actual thought.

Well at least she spoke her mind about it.

Saying that "it was different back in the day" doesn't really change anything.

Unfortunately those in the past were wrong on many things, pedophilia was one of the things that they were very very wrong about.

People who adhere to religions that have this stuff in them are responsible for what they are believing in.

The rape of young girls and women happens all over the world. It is then legitimatized by people who say that these religions are so old and that's just how it is.

But you see, we wouldn't be alright with someone who had a religion where they raped young boys at 12 and 13...or had pamphlets where someone raped young boys at that age...

But somehow the rape of young girls becomes forgivable because they are able to pop out babies(at a huge health risk to them). That somehow it is morally forgivable to a large swath of people on this planet.

Well, sorry. It's wrong.

Back 2k years or today. It's wrong.

Just like it was wrong for our wonderful ancestors to do blood sacrifices and burn witches at the stake.

So...

I guess what I'm saying is that just because it's history doesn't mean it should be excused or forgotten. And it definitely shouldn't if you're a part of the belief system that still includes that crap.

But guess what? Christianity and many other religions are just as bad.

So where's the reasoning behind censoring things like porn where both parties are adults and consenting yet allowing written nonsense about raping young girls?

originally posted by: thesaneone

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: thesaneone

Anyway this guy is a disgusting pig for trying to justify it by saying it's okay if the girl acts mature, freaking pig scum.

Back in those days it was common for girls to marry at a young age mainly because people didn't live as long as they do now.

But we are not in those days anymore and this guy is saying it's okay if the girl is mature, he actually says it was okay and he is not the only sick person who thinks like that.

The man was trying to defend Mohammad the person he believes spoke with God from a hostile woman who attacked him on the street. He had no idea what to day he just wanted the lunatic to get away and leave him alone. He didn't deserve Verbal assault from a woman who has issues. She has no right to put down this man's religion and he has no right to pit down hers. See you don't have to accept another person's belief but you do have to respect them.

originally posted by: PorteurDeMort
I can't believe anyone could make excuses for these scum. If she acts mature? Are you kidding me? Sick individuals.

You'll find people will support anything anti western culture on here, when they are not cheering Putin, making excuses for radicals or leveling the racist card any chance they can get while attacking all things Jew related. It's a circus.

The guy has a whole book stand of hadiths and is heard stating (if she acts mature).
Obviously Muslim.
Oh oh, red flag.
No matter what sick perverted crimes he promotes, he gets a pass.

We have been told how Britain was centuries ago.
Told this is a Muslim hit piece, what about the old bastards hitting on children with millions of dollars worth of publications and support apparatus behind it all to propogate it? Every book on his stand is a hit piece against humanity.
Fingers were pointed at Mormons. Then over at Catholics.
Anything to avoid the sick bastard in the video and the Islamic message being propagated.

The final trump card will fall soon. He will be declared non Islamic not representing Islam and misusing the texts.
That will make it all better.

a reply to: dragonridr
Watch the video again.
She asked him if he thought it was okay for someone to be with a young girl and he said yes if she was matured.

a reply to: dragonridr

You didn't answer my earlier question.

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?

^

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: PorteurDeMort
I can't believe anyone could make excuses for these scum. If she acts mature? Are you kidding me? Sick individuals.

You'll find people will support anything anti western culture on here, when they are not cheering Putin, making excuses for radicals or leveling the racist card any chance they can get while attacking all things Jew related. It's a circus.

The guy has a whole book stand of hadiths and is heard stating (if she acts mature).
Obviously Muslim.
Oh oh, red flag.
No matter what sick perverted crimes he promotes, he gets a pass.

We have been told how Britain was centuries ago.
Told this is a Muslim hit piece, what about the old bastards hitting on children with millions of dollars worth of publications and support apparatus behind it all to propogate it? Every book on his stand is a hit piece against humanity.
Fingers were pointed at Mormons. Then over at Catholics.
Anything to avoid the sick bastard in the video and the Islamic message being propagated.

The final trump card will fall soon. He we be declared non Islamic not representing Islam and misusing the texts.
That will make it all better.

What's sick is you attacking an entire religion out of bigotry and lack of knowledge. I hate all religions but I do respect the right for people to believe what they want. Funny part is have this similar thing when people start attacking Jews OR Christians.

Ironically someone I normally never agree with because he attacks Jews regularly and I'm on his side. But that aside a hit piece just to say how evil Muslims are is wrong. This man did nothing to her but she came to his work attacked his religion and told him she wanted him out the country. And oddly people are willing to defend this behavior I'd say several here need to do some self reflection your moral high ground is cracking.

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

You didn't answer my earlier question.

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?

Simple no its wrong they go to jail if I was in 1300s I'd expect a dowry probably a horse I like horses.do you realize hiw stupid your question is?? Let me ask you a question do you think it's ok to cut someone's head off and stake it to a castle wall ?? How about a lord that requires before you can get married he can sleep with your wife?? We can play this game all day and alot of sick things happened in Britain. So as they say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Mohammad did nothing other people were not doing at the time to use that to attack a religion is wrong.

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

You didn't answer my earlier question.

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?

Simple no its wrong they go to jail if I was in 1300s I'd expect a dowry probably a horse I like horses.do you realize hiw stupid your question is?? Let me ask you a question do you think it's ok to cut someone's head off and stake it to a castle wall ?? How about a lord that requires before you can get married he can sleep with your wife?? We can play this game all day and alot of sick things happened in Britain. So as they say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Mohammad did nothing other people were not doing at the time to use that to attack a religion is wrong.

The simple answer is they want to do what Mohammad did back then, today.
You cannot use the "it was what they did back then" defense because they want to do that stuff today and use the past to justify it. Today it is against the law. It is immoral. It is disgusting.
You are all about peoples rights? What about the rights of todays little girls to not be violated?

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

You didn't answer my earlier question.

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?

Simple no its wrong they go to jail if I was in 1300s I'd expect a dowry probably a horse I like horses.do you realize hiw stupid your question is?? Let me ask you a question do you think it's ok to cut someone's head off and stake it to a castle wall ?? How about a lord that requires before you can get married he can sleep with your wife?? We can play this game all day and alot of sick things happened in Britain. So as they say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Mohammad did nothing other people were not doing at the time to use that to attack a religion is wrong.

The simple answer is they want to do what Mohammad did back then, today.
You cannot use the "it was what they did back then" defense because they want to do that stuff today and use the past to justify it. Today it is against the law. It is immoral. It is disgusting.
You are all about peoples rights? What about the rights of todays little girls to not be violated?

Well that's a stupid argument isn't it. Though I'm not against the idea that means we need to ban the bible and the Torah as well. Sadly can't stop there though they may get the wrong idea reading history books so we probably need to get rid of those too. Oh wait ya know someone might get the wrong idea watching movies hmm guess we need to get rid of those to. Please tell me you aren't serious and just didn't think this all the way through.

Banning exposure of things just because you think someone might get the wrong idea does nothing but diminish our society. But hey let the book burning commence who said we changed since the middle ages.

PS girls today do have protection in most countries now if you want to deal with the ones that don't fine but leave the poor Muslims in London alone they are just trying to support there family and abide by the laws. If he molests a girl lock him up simple. But to accuse him of doing something based off his religion is wrong. You think we would have learned that ftom Hitler don't you think.

originally posted by: sayzaar

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Bloodydagger

Wow she's a bigot. In the middle ages girls could marry at 12.

You don't see that as being wrong? If a 12 year old married and had sex with a man in his 40s or 50s? (example)

Its wrong, period.

That lady was no bigot, she was speaking the truth.

Condone this form of pedophilia then you might as well condone ALL pedophilia. Its all the same. History be damned.

Wasn't pedophilia back than our values have changed what was acceptable than we consider wrong now. And just so you know I wasn't talking about Muslims when I said girls could marry at 12. Age of consent was between 6 and 8 depending on the area this was Brittish common law so that woman can attempt to throw stones however her relatives did 5 he same thing.

We can't try to place our values on people that lived 100s of years ago things change laws change. By age 12 girls could marry and immediately started trying to have kids since mortality rates were so high. Child bearing years were considered between 12 and 18. So she wasn't telling the truth she attacked that poor man's religion because she believes her beliefs are superior. And i take it back a he's not a big got she's a racist.

PS thus is nothing more than a Muslim hit piece they should be ashamed you aren't going to change people beliefs by attacking them. This is a sad testimony on our society.

You sound like an utter moron ! Trying to follow what you have written is very difficult because i think you border on being illiterate !!
I guess your low IQ may have something to do with backward views.

You might want to read a book and learn history. Before you judge a man dead for hundreds of years. And by the way attacking me doesn't change the facts but I get it you hate Muslims with that superior intellect of yours. Don't fall off your high horse and break your neck.

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

You didn't answer my earlier question.

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?

Simple no its wrong they go to jail if I was in 1300s I'd expect a dowry probably a horse I like horses.do you realize hiw stupid your question is?? Let me ask you a question do you think it's ok to cut someone's head off and stake it to a castle wall ?? How about a lord that requires before you can get married he can sleep with your wife?? We can play this game all day and alot of sick things happened in Britain. So as they say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Mohammad did nothing other people were not doing at the time to use that to attack a religion is wrong.

Why is my question stupid? Is it stupid to you that kiddie porn is illegal, disgusting, immoral and vile? Is it stupid to you that adults are not allowed to lust after children? I know you said its wrong, but you're defending this whole thing while bringing the "past" up and how people "back then" lived by a different set of rules etc......

Well, I have news for you buddy.......

It was disgusting back then and its disgusting now. Anyone who condones it is also disgusting.

When it comes to this subject, SCREW HISTORY!

If anyone ever did this to my child, I'd be in prison for murder.

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

You didn't answer my earlier question.

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?

Simple no its wrong they go to jail if I was in 1300s I'd expect a dowry probably a horse I like horses.do you realize hiw stupid your question is?? Let me ask you a question do you think it's ok to cut someone's head off and stake it to a castle wall ?? How about a lord that requires before you can get married he can sleep with your wife?? We can play this game all day and alot of sick things happened in Britain. So as they say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Mohammad did nothing other people were not doing at the time to use that to attack a religion is wrong.

The simple answer is they want to do what Mohammad did back then, today.
You cannot use the "it was what they did back then" defense because they want to do that stuff today and use the past to justify it. Today it is against the law. It is immoral. It is disgusting.
You are all about peoples rights? What about the rights of todays little girls to not be violated?

Well that's a stupid argument isn't it. Though I'm not against the idea that means we need to ban the bible and the Torah as well. Sadly can't stop there though they may get the wrong idea reading history books so we probably need to get rid of those too. Oh wait ya know someone might get the wrong idea watching movies hmm guess we need to get rid of those to. Please tell me you aren't serious and just didn't think this all the way through.

Banning exposure of things just because you think someone might get the wrong idea does nothing but diminish our society. But hey let the book burning commence who said we changed since the middle ages.

PS girls today do have protection in most countries now if you want to deal with the ones that don't fine but leave the poor Muslims in London alone they are just trying to support there family and abide by the laws. If he molests a girl lock him up simple. But to accuse him of doing something based off his religion is wrong. You think we would have learned that ftom Hitler don't you think.

The sick bastard openly states "if they act mature" referring to sex with underage girls. This is what his religion has taught him.
We do not ban the teaching of slavery in history, your argument is destroyed. We do not have open slavery markets and it is not banned from history books. Exposure is not banned.

No need to ban the bible qaran torah or anything else. The teachings of what is in them must fit with modern society not the other way around, bending society to ancient ways and customs.

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

You didn't answer my earlier question.

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr

If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?

Simple no its wrong they go to jail if I was in 1300s I'd expect a dowry probably a horse I like horses.do you realize hiw stupid your question is?? Let me ask you a question do you think it's ok to cut someone's head off and stake it to a castle wall ?? How about a lord that requires before you can get married he can sleep with your wife?? We can play this game all day and alot of sick things happened in Britain. So as they say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Mohammad did nothing other people were not doing at the time to use that to attack a religion is wrong.

The simple answer is they want to do what Mohammad did back then, today.
You cannot use the "it was what they did back then" defense because they want to do that stuff today and use the past to justify it. Today it is against the law. It is immoral. It is disgusting.
You are all about peoples rights? What about the rights of todays little girls to not be violated?

Well that's a stupid argument isn't it. Though I'm not against the idea that means we need to ban the bible and the Torah as well. Sadly can't stop there though they may get the wrong idea reading history books so we probably need to get rid of those too. Oh wait ya know someone might get the wrong idea watching movies hmm guess we need to get rid of those to. Please tell me you aren't serious and just didn't think this all the way through.

Banning exposure of things just because you think someone might get the wrong idea does nothing but diminish our society. But hey let the book burning commence who said we changed since the middle ages.

PS girls today do have protection in most countries now if you want to deal with the ones that don't fine but leave the poor Muslims in London alone they are just trying to support there family and abide by the laws. If he molests a girl lock him up simple. But to accuse him of doing something based off his religion is wrong. You think we would have learned that ftom Hitler don't you think.

The sick bastard openly states "if they act mature" referring to sex with underage girls. This is what his religion has taught him.
We do not ban the teaching of slavery in history, your argument is destroyed. We do not have open slavery markets and it is not banned from history books. Exposure is not banned.

No need to ban the bible qaran torah or anything else. The teachings of what is in them must fit with modern society not the other way around, bending society to ancient ways and customs.

Well Hitler thought the same way banned the reading of books that went against his society. And your saying what's in a book must fit with modern society. Guess we haven't learned as much as I thought in modern society. So the question becomes whi gets to be the one to decide you? You can't tell others what they read or believe great thing about being human we all have the same rights.

He Saying pedophilia is ok he was trying to defend his religion from a lunatic who came to his business to berate him. He wasn't the best choice to defend islam or he wouldn't be selling books out of a shack.she asked a question he wasn't smart enough to come up with a reply that didn't make him sound like an ass. Her question was what we call a loaded question a yes or a now she continues her rant.

Since I'm assuming he's never been arrested for child molestation that I know of he must think it's not appropriate. However when asked how could Mohammad do this what was he supposed to say??

He doesn't know it was a common practice back than. Worse yet slavery was common practice as well so much so even the bible thinks it's ok. We can't judge actions people did in history with today's standards. IN rome it was normal for a guy to have a younger male consort. Today we would lock them up.