It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
If they amended the Bill of Rights by the process given to us by the founders then I would respect it. That's a Republic.
originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: Krakatoa
I'd just like to say I am from the UK and don't agree with that posters views, before this escalates into a US/UK thing as they usually do..
No one has the right to take your property illegally and I would (and have) defended myself in those sort of situations. I think the guy was right to shoot in self-defence, assuming of course the story about him pulling a gun is true.
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
So are you saying that if the laws were "LEGALLY AND CONSTITUTIONALLY" amended so you couldnt carry a firearm you would pay just as much attention to it as you do the ones that currently say you can shoot children under certain circumstances?
If the law was changed so you had no freedom of speech would you simply stop talking and accept the loss of your right? If not then you are a hypocrite.
If they amended the Bill of Rights by the process given to us by the founders then I would respect it. That's a Republic.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: NOTurTypical
I would give over the shoes in this case cause they are not worth risking my life for.
Good way to not have to find out if he is serious or not.
He had ample opportunity. He chose not to take those opportunities. Please read up on this kids rap sheet. Or, you could just wallow in ignorance like the rest of the folks defending this piece of trash...now that is sad.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Krakatoa
Not everyone is a stone cold killer.
Some people are just 16 years Olds that are trying to make a quick buck.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Krakatoa
Not everyone is a stone cold killer.
Some people are just 16 years Olds that are trying to make a quick buck.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
So are you saying that if the laws were "LEGALLY AND CONSTITUTIONALLY" amended so you couldnt carry a firearm you would pay just as much attention to it as you do the ones that currently say you can shoot children under certain circumstances?
If the law was changed so you had no freedom of speech would you simply stop talking and accept the loss of your right? If not then you are a hypocrite.
If they amended the Bill of Rights by the process given to us by the founders then I would respect it. That's a Republic.
I would not. When America is no longer the land of the Free it is no longer America. That goes for all my rights, including the 2nd, though I own no guns, and have only fired a gun at a range maybe once in my life.
This is nothing to happy or rejoice in, a KID DIED TRYING TO STEAL A $200 PAIR OF SHOES
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Crime happens, my loved ones are at no smaller risk now that he is dead as his void will be filled by some one else.
originally posted by: IkNOwSTuff
a reply to: Krakatoa
He had ample opportunity. He chose not to take those opportunities. Please read up on this kids rap sheet. Or, you could just wallow in ignorance like the rest of the folks defending this piece of trash...now that is sad.
In all those 16 years of his long life when did he have ample opportunity for anything????
Do you really believe a 16 yo kid has a fully developed mind and all the life experiences to fully understand all the consequences of their actions?
I know for a fact I didnt so for you to be making this bold statement I guess you were a much wiser 16 yo than I and obviously this kid was.
This is the first time Ive even come close to defending "The piece of trash" as you so eloquently put it.
He did the wrong thing and paid the ultimate price and Im not interested in defending him, what Im doing is questioning the repugnant mentality of all of you who are seeing this as a positive situation.
This is nothing to happy or rejoice in, a KID DIED TRYING TO STEAL A $200 PAIR OF SHOES and you really really think this is cause for celebration and feel a sense of justice.
Theres just no words mate, no words.
I cant believe yet again Ive found myself in one of these threads, you progunners are as bad if not worse than religious fundamentalists, full of righteous and willful ignorance.
I just hope none of you who feel this is justified ever have a loved one make a mistake or make someone feel "threatened for their life" so much they end up on the receiving end of one of these Darwin bullets
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: NOTurTypical
he was a 16 year old kid who never had the chance to learn from his mistakes.....it is sad when we people decide that they are judge jury and executioner....
Age is irrelevant. When he was killed he was directly threatening the life of an innocent person. That was HIS CHOICE.
Can a 16 year old kill someone with a firearm, yes or no?