It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
a reply to: Murgatroid
anti-Catholic propaganda.
Purgatory exists. No matter who discovered/discussed it ...
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: uncommitted
If you had audio of Robin Williams saying 'Yes' and you set up a video where you act out asking a question of him and then the audio of him saying 'yes' was played, but you didn't know it was from a recording, would you want a more sterile testing environment to check if a dead person really did respond to a question, or would you be mind glowingly stupid enough to think it must be true?
Why of course not.
Because its a "ghost box" , lol. That "label" is proof enough.
Next they will come up with a "God" box.
originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
a reply to: uncommitted
1 doesnt doubt a place interpreted as such PURGATORY exist maybe it has different names transfers over times like Xibalba...
(Mayan pronunciation: [ʃiɓalˈɓa]), roughly translated as "place of fear",[1] is the name of the underworld in K'iche' Maya mythology, ruled by the Maya death gods and their helpers. In 16th-century Verapaz, the entrance to Xibalba was traditionally held to be a cave in the vicinity of Cobán, Guatemala. According to some of the K'iche' Maya presently living in the vicinity, the area is still associated with death. Cave systems in nearby Belize have also been referred to as the entrance to Xibalba.[2] In some Maya areas, the Milky Way is viewed as the road to Xibalba.[3]
OR NINHURSAG NETHER REALM
NAMASTE*******
originally posted by: uncommitted
I don't really care what your links say as they are opinion based, I've stated historical fact.
"The falsification of history has done more to impede human development than any one thing known to mankind" - Rousseau
“the biggest cover-up in the history of mankind is the history of mankind itself”
“There are two histories: official history, lying, and then secret history, where you find the real causes of events.” ~ Honoré de Balzac
originally posted by: uncommitted
Purgatory is a concept dreamed up roughly 1,400 years ago.
Anyone know where I could spend a few hundred dollars of my hard earned money on getting such a device, I mean it must be foolproof, right?
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: FlySolo
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: uncommitted
You're mixing two theories in the same response. It's either an audible response or a hoax, not both
I'm not mixing anything. At the start of the video you are conditioned to what the person presenting wants you to hear, and you heard it. There is no great difference.
Sheesh, you have no way of knowing if snippets of conversation Robin Williams made that are in the public domain were spliced together with a little white noise but you take a YT video as proof that the man was speaking after he died. I think you are somewhat missing the point.
Sorry, but you are mixing the two. Just re-read what you said. First, your suggesting that I'm predisposed to what I'm about to hear and therefore accept it. Second, you say that it could be spliced audio of Robin. If it's spliced audio, then that would indicate a deliberate hoax AND it is Robin's voice so no predisposition required because it's his voice spliced. Do you see now?
Thanks for being so patronising while missing the point. If you had audio of Robin Williams saying 'Yes' and you set up a video where you act out asking a question of him and then the audio of him saying 'yes' was played, but you didn't know it was from a recording, would you want a more sterile testing environment to check if a dead person really did respond to a question, or would you be mind blowingly stupid enough to think it must be true?
You may want to think that one through before you respond.
Do you see now?
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: Cambot
I'm probably only going to respond to one or two of you once but if you don't believe in the after life, then why are you in the forum? Only a skeptic would immediately say hoax.
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: uncommitted
You're mixing two theories in the same response. It's either an audible response or a hoax, not both
I'm not mixing anything. At the start of the video you are conditioned to what the person presenting wants you to hear, and you heard it. There is no great difference.
Sheesh, you have no way of knowing if snippets of conversation Robin Williams made that are in the public domain were spliced together with a little white noise but you take a YT video as proof that the man was speaking after he died. I think you are somewhat missing the point.
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: uncommitted
If you had audio of Robin Williams saying 'Yes' and you set up a video where you act out asking a question of him and then the audio of him saying 'yes' was played, but you didn't know it was from a recording, would you want a more sterile testing environment to check if a dead person really did respond to a question, or would you be mind glowingly stupid enough to think it must be true?
Why of course not.
Because its a "ghost box" , lol. That "label" is proof enough.
Next they will come up with a "God" box.
You caught me out, thank you for showing me the error of my ways. Anyone know where I could spend a few hundred dollars of my hard earned money on getting such a device, I mean it must be foolproof, right?
originally posted by: Hefficide
Just for the record - I had an NDE when I was younger ( I was actually dead for quite awhile before being brought back ) and have always been very upset about what I personally experienced.
After watching this video last night, on a whim, I shot off an email to Mr Huff and asked if the EVP's he's gotten ever discussed a particular concept, while leaving the details vague. He replied within hours, in a totally friendly manner - saying that the EVP's have discussed things like I had experienced... And in doing so he added in some of the details I had deliberately omitted.
Again, total skeptic, but very intrigued. If nothing else - Hell of a nice guy.