It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: kosmicjack
And we know he has strong ties with the Latino/Hispanic community, important for 2016 demographics.
Yes, he does...Apart from his degree in Latam Affairs and working for Latam Banks and Investment firms..
In 1971 in León, Mexico, where he was teaching English as part of a foreign exchange program, Bush met Columba Garnica Gallo. They were married on February 23, 1974, in Austin, Texas.[72][73]
They have three children:
en.wikipedia.org...
He brings the Latin vote. That plus obvious deep ties and history with Mainstream GOP through his Dad and brother, likely make him a prominent strategic pick for the Mainstream GOP in 2016.
The question is, how will he survive a primary where the far right base will demand a ferociously hard-line stance on immigration?
The strategy will be that the GOP will hope that the fringes of their party will fall in line, like they did behind Romney.
The question will be...faced with a 2nd Clinton, will the far right support a 2nd Bush as the better alternative..
So it looks like we are about to be fed a BUSH vs. CLINTON election...
Anyone spotting any potential 3rd party candidates that could disrupt the paradigm? Another Ross Perot?
originally posted by: kruphix
So early to tell anything yet...except for the fact that the Republican primary is going to be just as much of a circus as last time...and I will be watching and laughing at it the entire time.
the Republican National Committee, which moved in May to exert more control over the nominating process. The RNC's decision could be important, because according to the new rules, candidates that participate in non-sanctioned debates won't be allowed on stage at the official ones. The change was made to limit the number of acrimonious debates in which attacks on the party's eventual nominee will produce gaffes and fodder for Democrats in the general election.
Washington Republicans have moved to exert more control over their presidential primary debates, limiting the types and number of events in which 2016 candidates can participate, in an effort to get a firmer grip on the nominating process.
The Republican National Committee voted overwhelming Friday in favor of the change at their spring meeting in Memphis.
The 152-to-7 decision essentially allows the group to decide which events will be “sanctioned debates” -- based on their “timing, frequency and format, the media outlet and the best interests of the Republican Party.”
And any candidate who participates in a non-sanctioned debate will not be eligible to participate in ensuing sanctioned ones.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: kruphix
So early to tell anything yet...except for the fact that the Republican primary is going to be just as much of a circus as last time...and I will be watching and laughing at it the entire time.
I remember reading that after the last GOP primaries that the GOP was going to limit the number of debates and heavily moderate (control) the parameters of the smaller number of debates to avoid damaging candidates via in-fighting.
Let me Google a little..
the Republican National Committee, which moved in May to exert more control over the nominating process. The RNC's decision could be important, because according to the new rules, candidates that participate in non-sanctioned debates won't be allowed on stage at the official ones. The change was made to limit the number of acrimonious debates in which attacks on the party's eventual nominee will produce gaffes and fodder for Democrats in the general election.
www.theatlantic.com...
Washington Republicans have moved to exert more control over their presidential primary debates, limiting the types and number of events in which 2016 candidates can participate, in an effort to get a firmer grip on the nominating process.
The Republican National Committee voted overwhelming Friday in favor of the change at their spring meeting in Memphis.
The 152-to-7 decision essentially allows the group to decide which events will be “sanctioned debates” -- based on their “timing, frequency and format, the media outlet and the best interests of the Republican Party.”
And any candidate who participates in a non-sanctioned debate will not be eligible to participate in ensuing sanctioned ones.
www.foxnews.com...
Wow...The RNC has really cracked down on control of it's Nominees...
Maybe that is why Jeb Bush jumped in? he got the nod from the establishment RNC.
originally posted by: dominicus
a reply to: Indigo5
Anyone who votes for another Bush, is truly an idiot. It will be the same agendas going on behind the scenes as the other two idiots and more make shift wars in islamic countries guaranteed.
originally posted by: amicktd
Ehhh...what does it matter? The Bush and Clinton families have nothing to lose. They've already threw the country in the crapper. What more damage can they do?
Here is my prediction for the next presidency: Raised taxes, Double the national debt, re-deploy troops overseas, screw up healthcare some more, and ignore immigration. Oh and we need a real war not one of these made up terrorist wars.
I'm excited about CHANGE!
originally posted by: BushMaster16
originally posted by: amicktd
Ehhh...what does it matter? The Bush and Clinton families have nothing to lose. They've already threw the country in the crapper. What more damage can they do?
Here is my prediction for the next presidency: Raised taxes, Double the national debt, re-deploy troops overseas, screw up healthcare some more, and ignore immigration. Oh and we need a real war not one of these made up terrorist wars.
I'm excited about CHANGE!
Obama's peeples an hiz ministrashins: "They've already threw the country in the crapper." What more damage could a Jeb Bush administration possibly accomplish we ask? Jeb is a good Catholic - a family man with upstanding religious values, happily married too. He'll have the entire Hispanic/Latino vote wrapped. He's a principled man as well - in short, he's everything Obama is not. Most of all, Jeb is not a liar. Jeb doesn't frequent Chicago bathhouses either and he wouldn't be caught dead hangin out with with Commie radical scum like Saul Olinsky et al. Jeb is also NOT a morose loner and he would not be relying on a group of commie women always in the background secretly plotting against the American people. He's not a destroyer of American values and the founding documents - instead he's a builder - a political creator always looking to the common good of our nation.