It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jazzgul
I would like to see people to live there for researching purposes -I bet Mars has a lot secrets to unveil... but to create a colony there? I'm not sure, maybe if we learn first how to NOT destroy our own planet...
do we destroy mars life in order for us to live there or do we wait and check for life first???
i would also like to see electicy or solar power being used to power everything used on mars so we do not "polute" mars with gasoline and other harmful gases...
Originally posted by ChrisRT
I think we are past the petroleum age... We are just draining our supplies until they are gone. I mean, why make the transition and spend billions on newly designed cars-trucks when you can let the next generation of vehicles be designed with that (hybrids) and slowly introduce the population to them? There probable is no oil on Mars. I don�t think anyone is stupid enough to actually ship oil from Earth to Mars unless its just to power the space craft until fusion-antimatter engines are perfected. Not enough to even slightly pollute Mars.
We might not even begin terraforming Mars for a good while and we would have to use a base-city that are air tight. You can�t run polluting factories with no air. There is no atmosphere to keep in the pollutants and thus, no pollution of Mars.
We are ready; we just need a clean slate. Everyone know what consequences will arise if we screw this one up.
remember it is bush
also, would the burning petroleum just rise to space (before we terraform it)???
Originally posted by they see ALL
it is hard to answer this question:
do we destroy mars life in order for us to live there or do we wait and check for life first???
Originally posted by Amuk
Not really.
If their is life on mars it is a VERY primitive form, bacteria, maybe lichen or algae at most.
We should Terra form any way. The life might flourish in the new atmosphere and if it doesn't we can keep samples in a lab and Terra form anyway. This might rile a few people but a few germs and algae are not worth stopping us. Before people start saying EVERY life form is precious what about Small Pox? Should we stop using antibiotics because it kills germs? We deliberately destroy life forms every day for a lot less reason
Originally posted by subscorpion
Yes
Infact...i'll board the ship to be the first to be there :-D
Originally posted by Th0r
Yes.
I'd support human life on the moon first
Originally posted by ChrisRT
Just remember this... As soon as we get a Moon base set up the technologies will be studied and developed by commercial companies and ASAP they will begin constructing similar Moon bases and renting out vacation spots... You never know, come 2015 or so they just may be launching cargo rockets with the parts needed for a civil Moon/vacation base!
Also, don�t think that we will stall at the Moon... it's quicker and more efficient to launch from the Moon to Mars then from the Earth to Mars. Quicker trip with more cargo aboard. we also are entering another space race with the Chinese (it will be announced in some way or another in the coming times) and with private industry... You think the government will let a few civilian best them? That 2030 time frame for Mars that Bush gave was ~bull! We'll be there in 20...