It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: Klassified
Hey, I've got an interesting idea. Why don't you go over to the thread where the OP gets mad at Christians posting bible quotes on a conspiracy forum..... don't forget to tell them you hate Christianity and that's why you are spewing as many scriptures as you can.
Though revisionist scholarship over the past few decades has taken a decidedly politically correct view of the these conflicts, trying to apply certain modern value systems onto the vastly different historical conditions and attitudes of the time, the goals of Crusaders from the 7th to 11th were to recover regions that had originally long been Christian kingdoms until being conquered during the first of many waves of Islamic Jihad. Failure to appreciate the physical and cultural environment of the people involved when examining this topic has become a common mistake. As historian Raymond Ibrahim writes when discussing modern views toward the Crusades: “Medieval man was not modern man. While all men throughout all time have been prone to hypocrisy, greed, violence, etc., Medieval Christians, as opposed to their 21st century (secularized) counterparts, were, by default, much more guided by faith (whether this faith was misplaced or not is hardly the point). ’Secularism’ was never an option; Christians firmly believed in heaven and hell, God and the devil. And these were motives…One need not believe in God and religion; but one should still give them their due when discussing the Medieval world.” (“The History Channel’s Distortion of the Crusades” by Raymond Ibrahim, June 6, 2009. See: victorhanson.com...)
originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: Prezbo369
So wait let me get this straight. Maybe doesn't exist anymore. There is only yes or no and maybe equals no?
Let me ask you this. Do aliens exist? I say maybe since proving one or the other is impossible right now.
You're maybe = no argument strikes me as incredibly ridiculous. Am I the only one who thinks "maybe" is an acceptable response?
I have no problem in agreeing that that most Mulsims are peacfull. It is the Islamic scriptures and the example of Mohammad that I and the world is dealing with that I have a problem with, as that is the root cause that gives Muslims the authority and justification to act like animals
originally posted by: Metallicus
I am not a follower of any mainstream religion, but when I look at what is happening in the world today there is only one religion still in the dark ages. Muslims still kill in the name if their God and while Christians can be annoying they don't kill people anymore.
Blaming any group of people for their past is disingenuous. If Muslims want to be part of the 21st century we are all waiting to welcome them.
originally posted by: SomePeople
a reply to: Prezbo369
Atheist means no belief in a deity - agnostic means is unsure of the existence or non-existence of a deity.
You know, I know and everyone else knows that atheist is the incorrect term for what you are trying to describe.
You used the term incorrectly and have been arguing for the sake of it for pages now.
originally posted by: tavi45
a reply to: WakeUpBeer
So what's the proper term for me? I neither reject nor accept organized religions or God as fact. I actually pray every so often so clearly I don't reject God outright.
I thought that was agnostic (the maybe of religion rather than yes or no). Please enlighten me on how to describe my views rather than accusing me of being atheist, which I'm not.
Either way it seems to be irrelevant. My person beliefs on religion don't affect the reality of the lslamophobic double standards.
originally posted by: Seede
a reply to: fishwhisperer
I have no problem in agreeing that that most Mulsims are peacfull. It is the Islamic scriptures and the example of Mohammad that I and the world is dealing with that I have a problem with, as that is the root cause that gives Muslims the authority and justification to act like animals
You have no problem as in agreeing that moat Muslims appear to be peaceful in your area of the world as of now but given the opportunity that would change in a heart beat. The Muslims who are peaceful in this country are only peaceful because the they are subdued by numbers and that is slowly changing. The way it is changing is that they are well versed to take advantage of the mild mannered stupid Americans who are ashamed to be Americans. These wannabes believe that through political correctness they can love these people into being as stupid as they are.
One day you will see exactly what the truth is and I believe that day is soon to come. If one is a Muslim that one is conditioned to believe that its entire thought process is above that of an infidel and that when that Muslim has the advantage heads will roll. It matters not where in the world you are it is the same mindset. The American Muslim is no different than any other Muslim. They all eat from the same trough. I don't know your age but you may well see the day that you will have to kill to survive. It is the gravest of threats that Obama and his cronies are in bed with.