It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Swedish Air Force operates a pair of Gulfstream IVSP aircraft, known in Swedish service as S102B Korpen, used for ELINT (Electronic Intelligence) purposes.
The aircraft, based on the American Gulfstream business jet but equipped with eavesdropping sensors, conduct surveillance missions in the Baltic Sea. According to Swedish Air Force officials, during those sorties, the Korpens fly in international airspace, with their transponders turned on, and regularly transmit their position to the relevant civilian air traffic control agency, both domestic and, if needed, foreign ones.
Nevertheless, as reported by the Swedish media outlet SvD Nyheter, the Swedish spyplanes are almost always intercepted by Russian armed fighter jets on Quick Reaction Alert at the Russian airbase in the Kaliningrad enclave.
Most of times such encounters are routine stuff, something that has happened in international airspace across the world, for several decades. However, Swedish officials who talked to SvD explained that the behaviour of the Russian Su-27 Flankers frequently scrambled to intercept the Gulfstreams has become increasingly aggressive.
The most dangerous incident occurred on Jul. 16, between Gotland and Latvia, when a Russian Su-27 Flanker, armed with 6 air-to-air missiles, intercepted one of the two Swedish ELINT jet, and flew as close as 10,7 meters of the spyplane.
originally posted by: bjarneorn
This is just the little idiot Carl Bildt, trying to make a big issue of it.
originally posted by: bjarneorn
a reply to: Zaphod58
This is just the little idiot Carl Bildt, trying to make a big issue of it.
Carl Bildt, and his ilk ... have a dream of grandeur. He thinks, he's going to win Russia in a battle of wits.
For the most part, these "news" are fake ... where Carl Bildt comes on the news with "sad puppy" eyes, and 30 year old pictures of Russian aircraft.
It's the Swedish airforce that is in reality the agressor, as it's flying in what it "claims" to be international flight zone. Over Russian territory, thinking that because they have their transponders on ... they're just on "international flight" path.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: bjarneorn
This is not the only time that something like this has happened. We're far past the time that a business jet, like a Gulfstream IV is going to fly through Russian airspace. A high speed high altitude ISR platform, MAYBE, but an unarmed, business jet, no way.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: mortex
Bullcrap. The issue isn't that Russia intercepts Western intelligence aircraft, it's that they intercept aircraft in a dangerous manner. In 2012, a MiG-31 buzzed a Norwegian P-3 from behind so close that it was a near miss. Russian aircraft intercepting Western aircraft is a total non-story. Russian aircraft intercepting Western aircraft, and flying less than 50 feet off the wing, or flying in dangerous manners is a story. There's a HUGE difference between the two.
originally posted by: mortex
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: mortex
Bullcrap. The issue isn't that Russia intercepts Western intelligence aircraft, it's that they intercept aircraft in a dangerous manner. In 2012, a MiG-31 buzzed a Norwegian P-3 from behind so close that it was a near miss. Russian aircraft intercepting Western aircraft is a total non-story. Russian aircraft intercepting Western aircraft, and flying less than 50 feet off the wing, or flying in dangerous manners is a story. There's a HUGE difference between the two.
And we should believe every detail in our media?
Western media = truth that we shouldn't question, everything else = lies. Am I doing it right?
Swedish officials have described these routine intercepts as becoming "increasingly aggressive", culminating in the July 16th incident, in which a Flanker flew a mere 10.7 meters (35 feet) off the wingtip of the Korpen. International procedures call for a distance of between 50-150 meters (164-492 feet roughly) away from the intercepted aircraft.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: boomer135
Yes, but with tankers, it's formation trained pilots, flying a planned mission. An intercept isn't planned, nor is it trained for like that. That's what makes it so dangerous. All it takes is for one pilot to react wrong, or make a wrong move, and a big mess occurs.