It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: links234
How is this committee any different than the other committees who found nothing?
Another committee to find nothing. Boy, our congress is sure good at nothing.
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: LDragonFire
Are you saying that the Admin made no effort to cover up information re: Benghazi for political reasons?
Everyone in Washington does something for "political reasons". The WH doesn't comply with requests for information for "political reasons". Pelosi says "we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out what is in it."
originally posted by: LDragonFire
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: LDragonFire
Are you saying that the Admin made no effort to cover up information re: Benghazi for political reasons?
I think republicans are doing this for political reasons!! Shows there desperation. I don't trust them, they lied about Iraq wmd lies, lied about Obamacare, birther lies, remember the fiscal cliff they launched us over, remember tax breaks will create jobs, trickle down economics, gay marriage is a attack on traditional families???
9 Congressional hearings have found no evidence of wrong doing!
originally posted by: LDragonFire
Is this the 10th attempt to make something stick?
Republicans spent $30 million investigating Clinton.
$8 million on 9/11.
And how much on Benghazi?
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: LDragonFire
The same amount when Dems do the same thing. Stop acting like Dems walk on water.
April 1, 1998 The General Accounting Office announces that Starr had spent nearly $30 million on his investigation as of September 1997.
Kean and former congressman Lee Hamilton, the panel's top Democrat, requested additional funding in a letter to the administration last week. The money was to pay for a staff of about sixty and their resources. Kean plans to field a separate task force for each of nine areas that the law establishing the commission requires it to investigate. The panel has until the end of May 2004 to complete its work, but it will spend the $3 million it was originally allotted by around August 2003 — if it doesn't get the supplement. "We hope that this request will be included in the supplemental appropriations proposal now being prepared by the administration," wrote Kean and Hamilton in a March 19 letter to a CIA official who is in charge of intelligence community budgeting. The request has been endorsed by the entire bipartisan commission at a recent meeting. In denying the request, the White House irritated many of the members of the commission. "This is very counterproductive if the White House's intention is to prevent the commission from being politicized, because it will look like they have something to hide," said a Republican member of the commission.
originally posted by: Lyxdeslic
Total deaths - 60
Outrages - 0.
That's under Bush..
Now I'm not trying to bring up past news, but not a single peep was heard about these deaths. But four people die under Obama and H.Clintons watch and everyone throws a fit?
if republicans were so worried about security, why did they vote to cut money to keep embassies secure? Why are they continuing to try to cut the funds? You'd think that they would rather keep funding going and make sure that it goes to the security of these places, so another Benghazi doesn't happen.