It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bbracken677I think the questions would be:
Why a skeleton defense?
A key driver behind the weak security platform in Benghazi was the decision to treat Benghazi as a temporary, residential facility...This resulted in the Special Mission compound being excepted from office facility standards and accountability.
Why, when support was asked for, was it not granted?
The U.S. military’s response to the Benghazi attack was severely degraded because of the location and readiness posture of U.S. forces, and because of lack of clarity about how the terrorist action was unfolding. However, given the uncertainty about the prospective length and scope of the attack, military commanders did not take all possible steps to prepare for a more extended operation.
There was no “stand down” order issued to U.S. military personnel in Tripoli who sought to join the fight in Benghazi. However, because official reviews after the attack were not sufficiently comprehensive, there was confusion about the roles and responsibilities of these individuals.
Why was the attack itself referred to as the spontaneous result of a youtube video, when all parties knew that was bovine excrement? (Hint: Presidential election was right around the corner)
..that the initial talking points provided by the intelligence community were flawed because of conflicting assessments not an intention to deceive.
..that the initial talking points provided by the intelligence community were flawed because of conflicting assessments not an intention to deceive.
originally posted by: chrismarco
a reply to: xuenchen
It's really not a thorn in the democrats side because this is not going to deter one democrat voter to vote republican...it's that simple...
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
There are a couple of classic examples of this in recent history. Far be it for me to point out who had been caught with a hand in the cookie jar, and yet got reelected anyway.
Seems that, sometimes, what a person says (PC) is more important than what they do (corruption).
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
VERY GOOD POINT, on how no amount of corruption on the part of democrats will bother a democrat voter one bit.
The democrat voter by default, are just as foul and corrupt, morally bankrupt human beings, to the point that they do not care even one tiny bit how vile one of their supported candidates are, they will vote for them anyway.
originally posted by: LDragonFire
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
There are a couple of classic examples of this in recent history. Far be it for me to point out who had been caught with a hand in the cookie jar, and yet got reelected anyway.
Seems that, sometimes, what a person says (PC) is more important than what they do (corruption).
Like Mark Sanford (R SC)
Can you give examples of Democrats being caught in a scandal only to be re elected?
A House panel on Tuesday found Representative Charles B. Rangel guilty of 11 counts of ethical violations, ruling that his failure to pay some taxes, improper solicitation of charitable donations and failure to accurately report his personal income had brought dishonor on the House.