It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: proob4
Your pdf link is a malicious threat according to malewarebytes. And it's not official either.
'Mods please delete link!
A U.S. Army report warns that American troops need to be prepared to enter New York City and other GLOBAL “megacities”
originally posted by: MysterX
a reply to: AnteBellum
It's all a bit worrying.
But this part is an eye-opener;
A U.S. Army report warns that American troops need to be prepared to enter New York City and other GLOBAL “megacities”
So the US Army is planning to install itself into major cities around the GLOBE?
WTH?
originally posted by: tavi45
PS if american soldiers are ordered to assault american citizens and they collectively refuse they are now traitors and subject to death. Also that's the start of american civil war except with way way more people, deadlier weapons by orders of magnitude, and most likely intrusion from foreign powers. I bet if a civil war started mexico would reclaim it's territory
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
originally posted by: tavi45
PS if american soldiers are ordered to assault american citizens and they collectively refuse they are now traitors and subject to death. Also that's the start of american civil war except with way way more people, deadlier weapons by orders of magnitude, and most likely intrusion from foreign powers. I bet if a civil war started mexico would reclaim it's territory
Actually, my MOS in the Army was 27D--Paralegal Specialist--and I was responsible for producing charge sheets for courts-martial with an intimate knowledge of the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) and the MCM (Manual for Courts-Martial). That said, disobeying a direct order is not "treason," it is disobeying a direct order. Now, there is always the ability for an attorney to type up their own charge that doesn't necessarily exist in the books, but that rarely happens. My point being is that, yes, if they turn their guns on the people barking out the orders, then that could possibly, loosely be considered treason, but since previous events set precedent, this would probably be called "workplace violence" by our commander-in-chief.
And don't forget, all military members are only trained to follow LAWFUL orders. Following illegal orders--like slaughtering American civilians--would be treated like a crime, even if they were "just following orders."
Maybe the rest of your comment is a logical necessity in order to correct such a wrong as our "leaders" turning on our nation's civilians with lethal force for nefarious intent...except I'm quite certain that Mexico would not be able to "reclaim" its territory (it's not theirs, BTW...they lost it sort of fair and square).
If america breaks international law who is going to go get the guilty parties?
All a big song and dance my friend... That's why "law" means nothing to me and I prefer to stick with morals instead... Is it morally justifiable to drop bombs and torture innocent people? Shoot innocent people from helicopters tanks etc... Morally justifiable to use drones and blow people up... Hmmm probably not... Sod the "laws" big fing joke the elite use to hide behind in my opinion....
Just look at how corporations are deemed a "person" by "law" hahahahh yeah sure! Please dont perpetuate the myth that is "law"...