It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The name יֵשׁוּעַ "Yeshua" (transliterated in the English Old Testament as Jeshua) is a late form of the Biblical Hebrew name יְהוֹשֻׁעַ Yehoshua (Joshua), and spelled with a waw in the second syllable. The Late Biblical Hebrew spellings for earlier names often contracted the theophoric element Yeho- to Yo-. Thus יהוחנן Yehochanan contracted to יוחנן Yochanan.[11] However, there is no name (aside from Yehoshua`) in which Yeho- became Ye-.
originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: Utnapisjtim
Yet you still can't point out anything that says that Jesus had a son. You're just trying to avoid the question.
originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
Ephesus ==> "To the one who conquers I will grant to eat of the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God."
Smyrna ==> "The one who conquers will not be hurt by the second death."
Pergamum ==> "To the one who conquers I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white stone, with a new name written on the stone that no one knows except the one who receives it."
Thyatira ==> "The one who conquers and who keeps my works until the end, to him I will give authority over the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron, as when earthen pots are broken in pieces, even as I myself have received authority from my Father. And I will give him the morning star."
Sardis ==> "The one who conquers will be clothed thus in white garments, and I will never blot his name out of the book of life. I will confess his name before my Father and before his angels."
Philadelphia ==> "The one who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God. Never shall he go out of it, and I will write on him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down from my God out of heaven, and my own new name."
Laodicea ==> "The one who conquers, I will grant him to sit with me on my throne, as I also conquered and sat down with my Father on his throne."
originally posted by: Ove38
The seven angels are seven Bishops of seven Church's in the first century, the whole book of Revelation is a dramatization of their great ministry work in the first century.
'The angels of the churches' [U: of Revelation 1-3] are not their presbyters or bishops, but heavenly spirits who exercise such a superintendence and guardianshipover them that whatever in their assemblies is worthy of praise or censure is counted to the praise or the blame of their angels also, as though the latter infused their spirit into their assembly"
originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: Utnapisjtim
In Revelation 1 the Son of Man proclaims he is the Alfa and Omega. In Revelation 21 and 22, he who sits at the throne says he is the Alfa and the Omega. Are you saying Jesus is both sitting on the throne AND simultaneously lying in front of himself looking as though he had been slaughtered? And at the same time being his own son who has conquered and seated himself beside Jesus just as Jesus sat down on HIS Father's throne?
I understand this is awfully confusing for you, but: Make up your bloody mind!
That's exactly what the verse I quoted from Matthew 28:18 means.
Why do you put limitations on God? The One who was the First and the Last, the Alpha and Omega? The Father, Son and Holy Spirit? The Bible talks about this in great length, yet some will never understand.
originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: Utnapisjtim
The one who conquers means EVERYONE who conquers.
The preceding statements demonstrate the folly of attempting to construct a system of ecclesiastical polity from such a highly-figurative portion of Scripture as the Apocalypse. In the angel of the Church some have believed they have discovered the moderator of a presbytery; others, the bishop of a diocese; and others, the minister of an Irvingite congregation. But the basis on which all such theories are founded is a mere blunder as to the significance of an ecclesiastical title. The angels of the Seven Churches were neither moderators, nor diocesans, nor precentors, but messengers sent on an errand of love to an apostle in tribulation.
So everyone is the son of God, and everyone are running around with iron rods smashing up pottery? Everyone has a throne inherited by their fathers? Common, you can't possibly believe such nonsense!
How do you explain that? How can Jesus both be the guy on the throne AND the Lamb in front of it?
There is only one small window of time in which there were only seven churches in Asia. The early AD 60's. The apostle Paul established nine churches in that area, but only seven were addressed in Revelation. The reason for this is that the cities of Colosse, Hierapolis, and Laodicea, were all destroyed by an earthquake around AD 61. Laodicea was rebuilt soon afterwards, but the other two cities were not. This left only seven churches in Asia during the five years just prior to the beginning of the Roman/Jewish war.
originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: Utnapisjtim
How do you explain that? How can Jesus both be the guy on the throne AND the Lamb in front of it?
Once again, the same way that he was capable of being the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, and the First and the Last. Read this next verse carefully...
Matthew 28:19
19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
It says baptize them in "the name", not names.
Zechariah 14:9
9 And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and his name one.
Jesus has power over all of heaven and earth, and yet you still try to hold him to some kind of human standard?
Don't you see that you have a BIG problem explaining how it is possible to be two places at the same time,
Are you saying that Jesus is JHVH?