It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Since the Council on Foreign Relations did not, as a body, claim that "the Ukraine Crisis is the West's fault," I submit that this whole thread be moved to [HOAX!]
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Bassago
The only people in denial are the ones desperately clinging to the propaganda that Russia did not invade Ukraine.
Armed Russian soldiers entered Ukraine via Crimea. Those soldiers wore no insignias. Those soldiers failed to stay at their base and instead spread out over the countryside, securing government buildings, police stations, and Ukraine military bases.
ALL done prior to the illegal referendum held.
AKA an armed invasion of Ukraine by forces from the Russian Federation.
originally posted by: Bassago
a reply to: DJW001
Since the Council on Foreign Relations did not, as a body, claim that "the Ukraine Crisis is the West's fault," I submit that this whole thread be moved to [HOAX!]
Since the Council on Foreign Relations published the article on their Foreign Affairs web site I submit that your suggestion be disregarded.
The CFR did not arrive at that conclusion. An op ed opinion piece did. It falls into the category of the following does not represent the views of.....
Yanukovych, stated Crimea belongs to Ukraine and not Russia.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
So the NAVAL port has nothing to do with the situation...RIGHT.
CFR is a CABAL mouth piece (Their main ONE too)and a tool of the banks,they want control OVER the US now. It's bull.
Let me note too that we have already heard declarations from Kiev about Ukraine soon joining NATO. What would this have meant for Crimea and Sevastopol in the future? It would have meant that NATO’s navy would be right there in this city of Russia’s military glory, and this would create not an illusory but a perfectly real threat to the whole of southern Russia. These are things that could have become reality were it not for the choice the Crimean people made, and I want to say thank you to them for this.
originally posted by: Bassago
As I said before not anymore and I doubt it's ever coming back. US/EU/IMF/NATO should have left well enough alone and Crimea might still be there. And shortly they may lose the entire eastern part of the country.
While I have no doubt the NeoCons in the US would like a world war with Russia I doubt the EU is looking forward to it. (Note: that part is just my opinion.)
The only difference is those arguments on how the article misses major key points and completely ignores others will be discredited on tv instead of us discrediting it in these threads.
Giving into Russia on Crimea is the equivalent of giving into Hitler over the Sudetenland. Its only the beginning and based on what I have seen of Putin to date
We do not have fact checkers and rely on authors to ensure the veracity of their statements. Although we try to avoid using footnotes, contributors should be able to provide appropriate citations for any facts or quotations their pieces contain. Unless otherwise informed, we assume any piece submitted to us is being offered exclusively and that no piece accepted for publication will be published elsewhere simultaneously in any form without our knowledge.
The article and information in it is from John Mearsheimer, not CFR itself.
Doesn't make it a hoax however....just a bit misleading from the OP.
Lithuania's Foreign Minister Linas Linkevicius tweeted with "deep sorrow" that "Mr Mykola Zelenec was kidnapped & brutally killed by terrorists there".
Ukraine routinely calls the pro-Russian separatists in Luhansk "terrorists".
The news came amid reports that some Russian aid lorries had reached Luhansk without any permission from Ukraine.
There has been no comment from the rebels yet on the Lithuanian diplomat's death.
Lithuania is among the most vociferous EU member states in its criticism of Russian actions in Ukraine. The EU and US accuse Russia of fomenting the separatist rebellion in eastern Ukraine.
Russia-Lithuania tensions
Mr Linkevicius described the entry of the Russian aid convoy into eastern Ukraine as "a blatant violation of international law", echoing Ukraine's condemnation of the move.
The UN Security Council is holding an emergency session at Lithuania's request to discuss the issue.
The Ukraine crisis has heightened tensions between Russia and the three Baltic republics - including Lithuania - which used to be Soviet republics governed from Moscow.
Russia's ambassador to the United Nations, Vitaly Churkin, lambasted the Lithuanian delegation on Friday.
He scorned "the indefatigable delegation of Lithuania, which is always torpedoing all productive, constructive initiatives we've had in the Security Council".
He said Lithuania had amended a Russian proposal calling for a ceasefire while the aid was distributed in Luhansk. He said the Lithuanian delegation "sent in amendments where they dropped the reference to Russia and included a reference to the European Union, and then dropped the reference to a ceasefire".
At the UN, he added, "the Lithuanian delegation starts working, and of course we know the division of labour - the US and UK are not far behind".
You attempted to pass it off as something that came from the CFR, not something submitted to it. I raised these points, which you ignored / discounted.
originally posted by: Bassago
Nope I was quite clear in posts who the author was and that I made no claim he was CFR, simple the CFR published it. Maybe you skipped all that, I don't really know.
originally posted by: Bassago
a reply to: elementalgrove
2. Why would they throw the National Endowment for Democracy under the bus so to speak?
The only reason that makes any sense is that Western actions were not totally in the plan of the CFR. Most likely the US and NATO got greedy and jumped the gun. Western expansion is a huge temptation.
originally posted by: Bassago
a reply to: kx12x
Thank you kx12x, this was one of the links within the articles of the OP. Probably should have added it but I'd hoped folks would actually read the links.
As I mentioned, this is history, for many younger folks this is unknown information. For "pro west" folks this is stuff to be avoided. For people who just want the truth, well this is gold.
Edit to add:
U.S. and European leaders blundered in attempting to turn Ukraine into a Western stronghold on Russia’s border.
originally posted by: Bassago
a reply to: Xcathdra
As I stated before - your thread and its content has been posted time and again and debunked time and again.
As I said, Uh huh. I see nothing to validate what you say. Show me where it's been posted before. Show me where it has been debunked.
I know (from your postings) that you are "pro-west." I don't really care, I am pro-humanity. What I do care about are facts which you seem sadly short of. If the CFR site and statements aren't enough for you then I don't know what to say. Maybe "You're a credit to your government propaganda" will suffice.
originally posted by: Bassago
a reply to: Xcathdra
There you go again.This thread and links are about the CFR admission that the Ukraine crisis is the Wests fault. It is not about:
Russia and Nazi Germany
or
The USSR's failed economy
or
Putin and Russian press freedoms
or
Germany - Konigsberg
or
The KGB.
Nice try deflecting, no cigar though.
You guys can make the same topics over and over and over and yet, no mater how you hide the fact the info has been discussed and Russian claims debunked, the end result is clear.
BTW still waiting for your supporting "proof" and link sources showing this has been debunked.
You posted the info trying to pass it off as something coming from the CFR. You posted that the EU/US got greedy and went beyond the CFR position. You stated the thread is about the CFR when in fact its not.
By all means Mr. Putin, continue explaining to us why we should take what you say as valid and not an omission, lie or deliberate attempt to pass something off as its not.