It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: waypastvne
Thats very nice.... but LaBTop is claiming " 72 miles/sec" which is 337 times the speed of sound.
originally posted by: LaBTop
Yess, slip of the tongue, at least you both pay good attention. It was of course meant to be meters per second.
The m/s let me hastily type miles/second, which waypastvne correctly saw, and MALBOSIA explained what it had to be.
Thank you both for peer reviewing my sometimes too hastily typed texts.
Please proceed doing that, I highly appreciate it. We are not perfect, not at all, we, and of course also I, make mistakes.
Not with the WTC's, however. I'm damn sure I'm right, after 13 years of research.
After detaching from the cliff, the rock mass slide down a rock shelf for 600 feet at an angle of 50 degrees from vertical and acquired sufficient speed to free-fall ballistically an estimated 1800 feet ( 550 m ) prior to impacting about 200 feet (60 m) from the base of the cliff in the Happy Isles area of the valley floor
--snip--
The estimated granite rock mass which fell is 80,000 tons. Ballistic calculations show that the rock impacted on the talus slope at the base of the cliff with a velocity of approximately 117 m/s (260 mph). The component of the rock's velocity tangential to the slope at impact was 78 m/s or 174 mph. It is this 174 mph wind blast which blew over the trees.
More about the glass: “Powerful gusts can shatter windows, so for the sake of safety, tempered glass eight times stronger than needed was specified. Planners designed the towers to withstand prolonged winds of 150 miles per hour.” (Angus Gillespie, Ibid., p. 81.)
“The twenty-two-inch spaces between the columns are for the windows, which are recessed ten inches in order to shade them from all but direct sunlight. The architect specified a bronze-tinted, heat-reflective glass for the 43,600 windows.” (Gillespie, Ibid., p. 108.) The glass itself was eighteen and a half inches wide. The 107th floor of the north tower had 30-inch wide windows, for the Windows on the World restaurant. Likewise, “extra-wide windows” were needed for the interior observation deck of the South Tower. (Ibid., p. 216.)
The windows spanned from just above the floor to the ceiling. The foot-high air vents ran the length of the floor. (See them in this video [mirror], source: NIST FOIA, 911datasets.org release 30, 42A0353 – G30D7.)
Silicate, or SiO2, is mixed with other materials to lower the melting point of glass to about 1500 C (2700 F) – see en.wikipedia.org... – so if the NYPD Museum and the above photo are correct and the glass did melt, then there were some extraordinarily hot temps going on. WTC fire temperature: 1000 C (NIST faqs [7]).
originally posted by: LaBTop
Where the rock "shard" of course had reached the full 100 % FFA (free fall acceleration) long before it reached the end of that more than 1/2 a km, in fact 733 meters, height of its fall.
Waypastvne : As an example here we have a natural rock fall which produced a 78 meter / sec wind. This wind was strong enough to blow over 10 acres of trees.
The component of the rock's velocity tangential to the slope at impact was 78 m/s or 174 mph. It is this 174 mph wind blast which blew over the trees.
Note that there are two envelop maxima in the recorded waveforms approximately 13.6 seconds apart, with the amplitude of the second maxima approximately four times the amplitude of the first maxima.
The implication is that there were two prominent rock impacts, 13.6 seconds apart and that the second one contained about 80 percent of the total rock mass.
-- the times of the impacts were 01:52:28.0 UT and 01:52:41.6 UT, respectively.
originally posted by: LaBTop
I expect a LOT of knife sharp huge rock splinters and boulders having been launched laterally too, with a lot more mass than compressed air, when that 80 million kilos hit the foot of that rock formation. I suppose that added quite some mass to the tree felling event.... If I look at that photo of the aftermath of that rock slide, I see an AWFUL lot of huge boulders laying around in that clearing.! (7x CTRL+ = max zoom) One big pool billiard. And a lot of long tree trunks.
That was probably the main component of that tree felling event.
originally posted by: LaBTop
I am really confused
In every collapse, there's an initiation moment.
Which is it?
1. Floors starting to collapse?
2. Core columns tipping over, falling on floors and then the floors are failing?
It means in your thoughts, they were NOT buckling, but must have NATURALLY broken loose, at their bolts, at BOTH ends, at the initiating floors,
and then some mysterious force must have pushed them 180 degrees over,
Do you realize how strange that sounds as an explanation,
Do you understand at all what it means; the fact that we see the top 7 floors and the WHOLE INTACT ROOF LINE sink vertically, still mainly INTACT, in those first three seconds of the collapse of the North Tower?
It means that there must have been immense VERTICAL progressing forces being applied to the tops of ALL core columns and perimeter columns in the NEXT 8 floors, if it was a naturally induced event.
Which Beck proves mathematically impossible for a NATURAL collapse, using the known facts about the structural steels used in that North Tower.
Only severing all core columns on the initiating floors by means of huge explosive forces (TB's)
that displaced/uplifted these core columns f.ex. a foot high,
He found no PROGRESSIVELY INCREASING resistance.
It was mainly the core that delivered the bulk of resistance. When that was eliminated, the floors plus perimeter could NEVER slow or halt the inevitable collapse.
And got helped on the way down with some additional exploding TB's. To be sure of a total collapse.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: lexyghot
Nope.
Neither the core nor ext columns offered any resistance.
Only the floors
It is almost as if they do not know how the building was actually constructed...... or know but ignore it as it destroys their conspiracy!
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: lexyghot
Nope.
Neither the core nor ext columns offered any resistance.
Only the floors
It is almost as if they do not know how the building was actually constructed...... or know but ignore it as it destroys their conspiracy!
originally posted by: Tedgoat
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: lexyghot
Nope.
Neither the core nor ext columns offered any resistance.
Only the floors
It is almost as if they do not know how the building was actually constructed...... or know but ignore it as it destroys their conspiracy!
Pot calling kettle black.
It's almost as if they do not know physics and how Steel Buildings can't be destroyed by Fire like the Windsor building!
And ignore the fact that the Official Story is Bull! Maybe they are just there to keep the Lie Alive?!
he Windsor Tower Fire, Madrid
Overview
Location: Madrid, Spain
Fire Event: 12 February 2005
Fire started at the 21st Floor, spreading to all floors above the 2nd Floor. Fire duration: 18 ~ 20 hours
Fire Damage: Extensive slab collapse above the 17th Floor. The building was totally destroyed by the fire.
Construction Type: Reinforced concrete core with waffle slabs supported by internal RC columns and steel beams, with perimeter steel columns which were unprotected above the 17th Floor level at the time of the fire.
Fire Resistance: Passive fire protection. No sprinklers.
Building Type: 106 m (32 storeys). Commercial.
The Damage
The Windsor Tower was completely gutted by the fire on 12 February 2005. A large portion of the floor slabs above the 17th Floor progressively collapsed during the fire when the unprotected steel perimeter columns on the upper levels buckled and collapsed (see Figure 1). It was believed that the massive transfer structure at the 17th Floor level resisted further collapse of the building.
The whole building was beyond repair and had to be demolished.
originally posted by: lexyghot
originally posted by: LaBTop
I expect a LOT of knife sharp huge rock splinters and boulders having been launched laterally too, with a lot more mass than compressed air, when that 80 million kilos hit the foot of that rock formation. I suppose that added quite some mass to the tree felling event.... If I look at that photo of the aftermath of that rock slide, I see an AWFUL lot of huge boulders laying around in that clearing.! (7x CTRL+ = max zoom) One big pool billiard. And a lot of long tree trunks.
That was probably the main component of that tree felling event.
Huh?
Experts go to the site to see what caused this unusual thing, and you decide by looking at a few pictures that they're wrong, and it MUST have been caused by boulders......
If this is how you've convinced yourself that all your other musings about 9/11 is correct, then I can see why no one of any importance gives your claims any credibility....
lexyghot : Neither the core nor ext columns offered any resistance.
Only the floors