It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Indigo5
AND THIS CRACKS ME UP...
And, according to Russia, there was a Ukrainian Air Force aircraft flying — presumably — in the direction of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.
Although the aircraft’s service ceiling is 22,965 feet — which drops to 16,000 feet with weapons — Russia said the fighter jet can reach 32,000 feet and easily hit a target nearly three miles away. Curiously enough, the Kremlin was caught editing the specifications on the Su-25’s Wikipedia page to increase its ceiling of 23,000 feet. It's also not an interceptor fighter jet — it's more of an attack plane for hitting targets on the ground.
mashable.com...
originally posted by: whitepanther999
originally posted by: Indigo5
AND THIS CRACKS ME UP...
And, according to Russia, there was a Ukrainian Air Force aircraft flying — presumably — in the direction of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.
Although the aircraft’s service ceiling is 22,965 feet — which drops to 16,000 feet with weapons — Russia said the fighter jet can reach 32,000 feet and easily hit a target nearly three miles away. Curiously enough, the Kremlin was caught editing the specifications on the Su-25’s Wikipedia page to increase its ceiling of 23,000 feet. It's also not an interceptor fighter jet — it's more of an attack plane for hitting targets on the ground.
mashable.com...
The Kremlin? Like actual Kremlin?
Was the nickname "VovaRussiaPutin"?
You accuse the whole government because of some idiot on wiki page?
Now, experts immediately noticed some problems here—chiefly that the Ukrainian warplane in question, if it really existed, was identified as an SU-25.
It was sort of weird to hear a Russian general call the Russian SU-25 a "fighter jet." That's because the SU-25 is an "attack jet," a slow, heavily armored aircraft designed for close air support of ground troops. It's not designed to be very effective at air-to-air intercepting and dogfighting.
In fact, one reason the SU-25 is a poor air-intercept jet is that it flies much lower than most fighter jets. According to Sukhoi, the manufacturer, its service ceiling is 7 kilometers, about 23,000 feet.
How to account for the difference in facts? By covering it up, apparently. Interpreter Magazine, which is funded by a nonprofit critical of the Putin administration, confirmed that after the press conference, edits were made to the SU-25's Russian Wikipedia page—changing its maximum altitude to 10 kilometers, up from 7:
So who did the editing? Well for that particular edit, here's where the IP address of the editor leads:
originally posted by: spy66
originally posted by: Indigo5
AND THIS CRACKS ME UP...
And, according to Russia, there was a Ukrainian Air Force aircraft flying — presumably — in the direction of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.
Although the aircraft’s service ceiling is 22,965 feet — which drops to 16,000 feet with weapons — Russia said the fighter jet can reach 32,000 feet and easily hit a target nearly three miles away. Curiously enough, the Kremlin was caught editing the specifications on the Su-25’s Wikipedia page to increase its ceiling of 23,000 feet. It's also not an interceptor fighter jet — it's more of an attack plane for hitting targets on the ground.
mashable.com...
There is a youtube video that show a group armed SU 25 fly at 7500m = 24606 ft. That tok Place in 1995.
I am going to see if i can find the video.
originally posted by: whitepanther999
originally posted by: Indigo5
AND THIS CRACKS ME UP...
And, according to Russia, there was a Ukrainian Air Force aircraft flying — presumably — in the direction of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.
Although the aircraft’s service ceiling is 22,965 feet — which drops to 16,000 feet with weapons — Russia said the fighter jet can reach 32,000 feet and easily hit a target nearly three miles away. Curiously enough, the Kremlin was caught editing the specifications on the Su-25’s Wikipedia page to increase its ceiling of 23,000 feet. It's also not an interceptor fighter jet — it's more of an attack plane for hitting targets on the ground.
mashable.com...
The Kremlin? Like actual Kremlin?
Was the nickname "VovaRussiaPutin"?
You accuse the whole government because of some idiot on wiki page?
originally posted by: CALGARIAN
Yep!
Even this lady said, I think the day of the plane crash, that Ukrainian military craft were hiding behind commerical aircraft.
LISTEN @ 1:05
(place on Closed Caption English)
Yes..It's funny..Unfortunately for the Russians...there is a world of aviation experts out there..
This video is published June 18th.
either it's been one hell of a long week or she's not talking about MH17
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Indigo5
Yes..It's funny..Unfortunately for the Russians...there is a world of aviation experts out there..
Here is one I like...
www.sukhoi.org...
Hard to beat these experts.
originally posted by: whitepanther999
As i have written in my edited post, i cannot find the source that talks about Kremlin IP editing the SU25 wiki.
Stop, found it.
LOL ..I know! But hell...the people who made the plane must be in on the conspiracy! All the Kremlin needs to do is edit Wikipedia to suit their claims! I feel sorry for the Rusky at the Kremlin who came up with that piece of failed propaganda. He has to be catching hell.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: spy66
originally posted by: Indigo5
AND THIS CRACKS ME UP...
And, according to Russia, there was a Ukrainian Air Force aircraft flying — presumably — in the direction of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.
Although the aircraft’s service ceiling is 22,965 feet — which drops to 16,000 feet with weapons — Russia said the fighter jet can reach 32,000 feet and easily hit a target nearly three miles away. Curiously enough, the Kremlin was caught editing the specifications on the Su-25’s Wikipedia page to increase its ceiling of 23,000 feet. It's also not an interceptor fighter jet — it's more of an attack plane for hitting targets on the ground.
mashable.com...
There is a youtube video that show a group armed SU 25 fly at 7500m = 24606 ft. That tok Place in 1995.
I am going to see if i can find the video.
Good luck with that. Once you find it, tack on another 50% to their maximum altitude and you get in the ballpark of MH17
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Indigo5
Yes..It's funny..Unfortunately for the Russians...there is a world of aviation experts out there..
Here is one I like...
www.sukhoi.org...
Hard to beat these experts.
LOL ..I know! But hell...the people who made the plane must be in on the conspiracy! All the Kremlin needs to do is edit Wikipedia to suit their claims! I feel sorry for the Rusky at the Kremlin who came up with that piece of failed propaganda. He has to be catching hell.
originally posted by: buddah6
originally posted by: rustyclutch
“Records show that the Ukrainian Air Force plane ascended to the distance of 3-5 km from the Malaysian Boeing,” he said. “The Su-25 can fly at altitudes of up to 10 km. It is armed with P-60 air-to-air missiles that can hit targets at a distance of up to 12 km and reliably within 5 km.”
source
Наличие американского спутника в районе катастрофы
Картаполов также сообщил о том, что 17 июля с 17.06 мск по 17.21 мск над юго-восточными районами Украины пролетал американский экспериментальный аппарат, предназначенный для обнаружения ракетных пусков.
Время катастрофы Boeing и время наблюдения спутником США за территорией Украины совпадают, указал генерал-лейтенант.
source
Translation
An American satellite in the accident
Kartapolov also reported that 17 July with ICN ICN 17.21 17.06 on the South-Eastern regions of Ukraine flew American experimental apparatus designed to detect missile launches.
The time of the accident, Boeing and United States satellite observations over the territory of Ukraine are the same, said Lieutenant General.
I know for some of the Russian Haters this is nothing more than propaganda and you will argue to your last breath that Russia or the Rebels are responsible. For the objective others....Russia's evidence looks a lot better than our evidence. Or should I say Russia actually has evidence. It could be fake....I doubt it is. If it is fake they did a better job than that phone conversation. Either way...I didn't see this up yet so thought I'd post it.
Well, where should I start? A Su 25 has a ceiling of 22000 ft and a top speed of 600 mph, OK. Explain to me how it could catch an airplane flying at 33000ft and flying at about the same speed as the Su 25 top speed. The Su 25 would have to take off and climb to it's ceiling altitude and accellerate to it's top speed. After this happens the 777 would be to far gone for an intercept but remember the Su25 is a ground attack airplane not an interceptor. No politics just physics.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: darkorange
Uhm, no, no, and no.
Ceiling is the point where the aircraft can no longer maintain a certain climb rate. It's an almost absolute. You can get a little higher than the published ceiling, but you can't stay there long, and you can't get a lot higher.