It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It says that about "Phinehas, the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest".
..but Melchazidek is the everlasting priesthood. The Priesthood of Christ.
The writer of Hebrews says that the covenant that made Aaron priest was weak, so was put aside.
The point is that the priesthood was never intended to be of Levi...but of Melchizadek...and eventually the everlasting priesthood of Jesus the Christ for Remission of Sins.
A type is singular by definition.
One in certain religions...is a word describing another god..not the God of the Bible.
According to who?
...Peace and Rest are names for Him.
You are just making this all up. I told you that earlier, and rather than producing any support, you are just reiterating your earlier claim.
For He is the fulfillment of all this daykeeping in the Olde Testament. It is now done away with the advent of the Cross and His Blood...to usher in the New Testament.
You make the point because you made it up.
Many Churches do not make this point because they like to have daykeeping..and such practices which are of bondage.
"Liberty" in the word is about being free of a life of sin, so it isn't a supposed freedom to do whatever you want.
I believe this is one of the points many of the posters are making about many Churches today. That they are more in line with bondage than Liberty intended in the Word. And they are correct.
This is stuff you can look up in Wikipedia.
I thank you in advance for any information's you can provide me here for my continued education.
That is a very controversial subject that hasn't been satisfactorily resolved.
Who is "son of man" in gospels !?
I think he was given sainthood as a reward for fighting the Reformation in Italy.
St. Charles Borromeo murdered Protestants? Please share how that is possible.
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: colbeI think he was given sainthood as a reward for fighting the Reformation in Italy.
St. Charles Borromeo murdered Protestants? Please share how that is possible.
The church recognizes him for being a "counter-reformist" , which is a euphemism for being a Protestant-hunter.
I think that Borromeo was the most ruthless murderer in the Reformation era.
originally posted by: colbe
A request. Please keep my posts together and reply underneath. Or if you have to, quote part of my post and reply, one on one is bearable in reply. It is awful when some people take your post apart sentence by sentence and even half sentences to talk more. The people reading it lose the meaning of the original post. This is the plan of those who do this. And ridiculous, they've divided your original post by ten comments! Are you suppose to then take the time to reply to each one of their comments then? Who has the time and it is endless.
originally posted by: colbe
It is going to take God Himself to bring some stubborn non-Catholic Christians to the Faith. Even then, some will say no! I pray Jim Dewey is NOT one of them.
Jim Dewey writes:
"They were early protestants who were literally slaughtered like animals BY Charles Borromeo.
I think they were buying on the black market, printed pages of the New Testament from Germany.
To this day, the SEPTUAGINT is problematic and why I have my blog to make a translation of it.
So it is no surprising thing that they didn't use it."
St. Chalres Borromeo murdered Protestants? Please share how that is possible.
What about the Protestant Inquisition? One of the killings, St. Thomas More's murder. And the murder of thousands of English Catholics. 2 million Irish Catholics were starved to death by Cromwell!
Martin Luther threw out 7 books of the New Testament because they conflicted, went against with his new heretical teachings. Luther used the excuse to say he followed the Palestinian Canon. There are two OT Canons. Palestinians were people in Judaism denying the Christian Faith. The Alexandrian OT Canon is the correct Canon of which Our Lord and the Apostles quoted most often from the Septuagint, there are 270 quotes. Figures, why they threw out the Septuagint. Luther was not guided by God, rather obvious.
It is so contradicting, to reject the Faith, Roman Catholicism while you accept the New Testament Canon of the Catholic Church! Do not give that already used excuse, you protest with an early Orthodox New Testament Canon because it contains books not found in the Gospel of the Protestant Bible. You accept the Roman Catholic New Testament Canon.
originally posted by: Akragon
originally posted by: colbe
A request. Please keep my posts together and reply underneath. Or if you have to, quote part of my post and reply, one on one is bearable in reply. It is awful when some people take your post apart sentence by sentence and even half sentences to talk more. The people reading it lose the meaning of the original post. This is the plan of those who do this. And ridiculous, they've divided your original post by ten comments! Are you suppose to then take the time to reply to each one of their comments then? Who has the time and it is endless.
yes...
you are supposed to respond accordingly to the comments in whatever way you feel is correct...
It is not my fault that you don't know the history of the Protestant Reformation.
You mislead, calling St. Charles a murderer. Name the people St.Charles physically murdered. Lying is mortal sin.
originally posted by: colbe
originally posted by: Akragon
originally posted by: colbe
A request. Please keep my posts together and reply underneath. Or if you have to, quote part of my post and reply, one on one is bearable in reply. It is awful when some people take your post apart sentence by sentence and even half sentences to talk more. The people reading it lose the meaning of the original post. This is the plan of those who do this. And ridiculous, they've divided your original post by ten comments! Are you suppose to then take the time to reply to each one of their comments then? Who has the time and it is endless.
yes...
you are supposed to respond accordingly to the comments in whatever way you feel is correct...
I am making a personal request. Be prideful if you wish and ignore it. Our silly fallen nature.
originally posted by: Akragon
originally posted by: colbe
originally posted by: Akragon
originally posted by: colbe
A request. Please keep my posts together and reply underneath. Or if you have to, quote part of my post and reply, one on one is bearable in reply. It is awful when some people take your post apart sentence by sentence and even half sentences to talk more. The people reading it lose the meaning of the original post. This is the plan of those who do this. And ridiculous, they've divided your original post by ten comments! Are you suppose to then take the time to reply to each one of their comments then? Who has the time and it is endless.
yes...
you are supposed to respond accordingly to the comments in whatever way you feel is correct...
I am making a personal request. Be prideful if you wish and ignore it. Our silly fallen nature.
haha... You're funny colbe
I always use the REPLY button to reply, that way, there is a highlighted text at the top of the post that is a link to the post that I am replying to, which brings up the entire post.
I am making a personal request. Be prideful if you wish and ignore it. Our silly fallen nature.
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: colbeIt is not my fault that you don't know the history of the Protestant Reformation.
You mislead, calling St. Charles a murderer. Name the people St.Charles physically murdered. Lying is mortal sin.
I was talking about the most notorious act of cruelty in the time that the Reformation was underway.
This was the murder of the Waldensians of Piedmont that sent shock waves of horror all across Europe at the news of this vicious campaign of genocide conducted by Borromeo.
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: colbeSo?
Shame on you. I am sure
in Heaven, St. Charles has already forgiven you. The ha, ha, Reformation was a revolt from the Faith.
You should go on a Crusade then, killing all non-Catholics, by that "logic".
I do not condone those things.
You didn't reply to the murder of English Catholics and 2 million Irish Catholics by Cromwell because of the Protestant Inquisition!
I was just reading a web page today that lists NT quotes from the OT and the conclusion of it was that most are quoting the Septuagint.
And no reply from you on the Alexandrian Canon, which contains the SEPTUAGINT which Our Lord and His Apostles quoted 270 times. Stupid Martin Luther.
No, but whatever floats your boat.
See how it helps to keep the original post intact Jim?
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: colbeI do not condone those things.
You didn't reply to the murder of English Catholics and 2 million Irish Catholics by Cromwell because of the Protestant Inquisition!
In that situation, I would have to side with the Catholics, just out of humanity and disregarding any sort of party loyalty.I was just reading a web page today that lists NT quotes from the OT and the conclusion is that most are quoting the Septuagint. Luther was one person and does not embody the entirety of Protestantism.
And no reply from you on the Alexandrian Canon, which contains the SEPTUAGINT which Our Lord and His Apostles quoted 270 times. Stupid Martin Luther.