It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Chiftel
You are perfectly correct, Spirited.
What is needed is not another law. It's a simple, sweeping ban + confiscation of all firearms.
And a simple change in the penal code such that if you are in possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony or you're an accomplice or accessory to someone who is, you get the chair, squad, noose or injection, whatever the actual felony.
originally posted by: Chiftel
Indeed. And only gunshot murders we've had are police or military personnel (invariably male) killing their spouses and girlfriends (I think there have been 3 or 4 such shootings in the last 25 years). But even these are rarer than hen's teeth.
Cause gun control actually works.
If it's not done half-arsedly, as if to purposely fail.
Oh, wait. I actually lied. There was this one guy that used his hunting shotgun to murder his wife's (a former model) lover but got away scot-free cause it was ruled self defence.
So yeah. Less guns = less shootings and less shooting deaths.
Practically no guns = practically no shootings and no shooting deaths.
More guns = more usage of guns. Not just against game.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: XTexan
I was was thinking an independent agency.
Something connected to the county of the state and not the federal government. For the purpose of buying a gun.
But yes, those reports would go to the feds. Sorry, but mentally ill people should not have access to firearms.
It's an idea, I'm not seeing the pro gun crowd coming up with anything.
originally posted by: HauntWok
a reply to: macman
Just keep in mind the 2nd can be repealed. All it takes is two thirds of the states to ratify a new amendment and legal guns go bye bye.
Want to be the mighty oak? Or the flexible willow?
The precedent is already there with the ACA, insurance is a much smaller pill to swallow than an outright ban.
Personally I'd much rather responsible gun owners keep their guns, and keep those guns out of the hands of the insane. But if gun rights activists can't work to solve this problem in a reasonable way, the ban will come.
originally posted by: GokuVsSuperman0
a reply to: HauntWok
Lol even just mentioning the pro-gun crowd gets all their panties in a twist. Australia has found a means of diminishing gun violence. Why is is that pro-gun supporters never offer an idea to stop all this gun violence, any idea at all would be fine. Instead they always profess that any change in gun policy will change nothing. Well then what will change it?