It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.



page: 1

log in


posted on Jul, 7 2014 @ 11:45 PM
I have been exploring and questioning and enduring what this means:

And the applications of it are quite broad, and have many and various ways of looking at it, which, I think should, all give us pause. for:

Interdiction is a military term for the act of delaying, disrupting, or destroying enemy forces or supplies en route to the battle area.[1][2] A distinction is often made between strategic and tactical interdiction. The former refers to operations whose effects are broad and long-term; tactical operations are designed to affect events rapidly and in a localized area.

The term interdiction is also used in criminology and law enforcement, such as in the U.S. War on Drugs and in immigration.[3]

The term interdiction is also used by the NSA when an electronics shipment is secretly intercepted by an intelligence service (domestic or foreign) for the purpose of implanting bugs before they reach their destination. According to Der Spiegel, the NSA's TAO group is able to divert shipping deliveries to its own "secret workshops" in a method called interdiction, where agents load malware onto the electronics or install malicious hardware that can give US intelligence agencies remote access. The report also indicates that the NSA, in collaboration with the CIA and FBI, routinely and secretly intercepts shipping deliveries for laptops or other computer accessories, such a computer monitor or keyboard cables with hidden wireless transmitters bugs built-in for easy dropping on video and keylogging.[4]

On this page
Word Browser

Advertisement (Bad banner? Please let us know
Remove Ads
Share: Cite / link:
in·ter·dict (ntr-dkt)
tr.v. in·ter·dict·ed, in·ter·dict·ing, in·ter·dicts
1. To prohibit or place under an ecclesiastical or legal sanction.
2. To forbid or debar, especially authoritatively. See Synonyms at forbid.
a. To cut or destroy (a line of communication) by firepower so as to halt an enemy's advance.
b. To confront and halt the activities, advance, or entry of: "the role of the FBI in interdicting spies attempting to pass US secrets to the Soviet Union" (Christian Science Monitor).
n. (ntr-dkt)
1. Law A prohibition by court order.
2. Roman Catholic Church An ecclesiastical censure that excludes a person or district from participation in most sacraments and from Christian burial.

I think it pervasive and interesting, that, the definitions listed above include and are not limited to, legal defense in the terminology of halting an enemy's firepower defense, etc, with many descriptions as to the FBI in terms of interdicting spies, and at the same time, discussing law, and then, the Roman Catholic Church's terminology…..

That just about covers everything, doesn't it? Conspiracy Wise, this covers both the law enforcement definition, and the pontiff's definition (religious)……

Let's, then, look at the socail distinctions, herein, as to this word….

1in·ter·dict noun \ˈin-tər-ˌdikt\

Definition of INTERDICT

: a Roman Catholic ecclesiastical censure withdrawing most sacraments and Christian burial from a person or district
: a prohibitory decree

On this page
Word Browser

Advertisement (Bad banner? Please let us know
Remove Ads
Share: Cite / link:
See: canon, constraint, decree, injunction, obviation, prohibition, proscription, refusal, restriction, veto
Burton's Legal Thesaurus, 4E. Copyright © 2007 by William C. Burton. Used with permission of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
INTERDICTION, civil law. A legal restraint upon a person incapable of managing his estate, because of mental incapacity, from signing any deed or doing any act to his own prejudice, without the consent of his curator or interdictor.
2. Interdictions are of two kinds, voluntary or judicial. The first is usually executed in the form of an obligation by which the obligor binds himself to do no act which may affect his estate without the consent of certain friends or other persons therein mentioned. The latter, or judicial interdiction, is imposed by a sentence of a competent tribunal, which disqualifies the party on account of imbecility, madness, or prodigality, and deprives the person interdicted of the right to manage his affairs and receive the rents and profits of his estate.
3. The Civil Code of Louisiana makes the following provisions on this subject: Art. 382. No person above the age of majority, who is subject to an habitual state of madness or insanity, shall be allowed to take charge of his own person or to administer his estate, although such person shall, at times, appear to have the possession of his reason.
4.-383. Every relation has a right to petition for the interdiction of a relation; and so has every husband a right to petition for the interdiction of his wife, and every wife of her husband.
5.-384. If the insane person has no relations and is not married, or if his relations or consort do not act, the interdiction may be solicited by any stranger, or pronounced ex officio by the judge, after having heard the counsel of the person whose interdiction is prayed for, whom it shall be the, duty of the judge to name, if one be not already named, by the party.
385. Every interdiction shall be pronounced by the judge of the parish of the domicil or residence of the person to be interdicted.
386. The acts of madness, insanity or fury, must be proved to the satisfaction of the judge, that he may be enabled to pronounce the interdiction, and this proof may be established, as well by written as by parol evidence and the judge may moreover interrogate or cause to be interrogated by any other person commissioned by him for that purpose, the person whose interdiction is petitioned for, or cause such person to be examined by physicians, or other skillful persons, in order to obtain their report upon oath on the real situation of him who is stated to be of unsound mind.
387. Pending the issue of the petition for interdiction the judge may, if he deems it proper, appoint for the preservation of the movable, and for the administration of the immovable estate of the defendant, an administrator pro tempore.
388. Every judgment, by which an interdiction is renounced, shall be provisionally executed, notwithstanding the appeal.
389. In case of appeal, the appellate court may, if they deem it necessary, proceed to the hearing of new proofs, and question or cause to be questioned, as above provided, the person whose interdiction is petitioned for, in order to ascertain the state of his mind.
390. On every petition for interdiction, the cost shall be paid out of the estate of the defendant, if he shall be interdicted, and by the petitioner, if the interdiction prayed for shall not be pronounced.

Black's Law Dictionary may be a fares, but this is law today. This is what you may face if you are judged to be incompetent, mentally, in the state you live in. I think it important on many levels, and so I've included the legal definitons, herein.

What I find most important about this is, (1) you don't have to be there for the hearing to judge you as to this.
it can be conducted, in most states, in absentia: meaning: you don't have to be there.

(2) It completely nullifies you legally. It is called a "civil death,"

posted on Jul, 7 2014 @ 11:50 PM
for it so nullifies you, and your rights, experiences and opinions. After this legal ramification, you are not allowed to vote, marry, own, buy or sell property….etc….

Hmm. Sounds like you can't participate in commerce without the "mark?"

Discuss, please.

My main proponents of this area are: Once it's happened legally to you, you have no civil rights. It can happen "in absentia" without you even knowing or being there.

Once you are in that "grey zone" of this legality, and have no rights to sue, be sued, vote, make any judgements, it is "open season" upon you: In other words, you have no civil rights, and anyone can do anything to you, and you CAN DO NOTHING TO PROTECT YOURSELF….

posted on Jul, 8 2014 @ 12:03 AM

The American public was never informed that the military had planned to develop electromagnetic weapons until 1982, when the revelation appeared in a technical Air Force magazine.

The magazine article stated, "....specifically generated radio-frequency radiation (RFR) fields may pose powerful and revolutionary anti-personnel military trends." The article indicated that that it would be very easy to use electromagnetic fields to disrupt the human brain because the brain, itself, was an electrically mediated organ. If further indicated that a rapidly scanning RFR system would have a stunning or killing capability over a large area. The system was developable.

Navy Captain Dr. Paul E. Taylor read a paper at the Air University Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education, at Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama. Dr. Taylor was responsible for the Navy's Radiation Laboratory and had been studying radiation effects on humans. In his paper, Dr. Taylor stated, "The ability of individuals to function (as soldiers) could be degraded to such a point that would be combat ineffective." The system was so sophisticated that it employed microwaves and millimeter waves and was transportable by a large truck.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the South Bay, are working on the development of a "brain bomb". A bomb could be dropped in the middle of a battlefield which would produce microwaves, incapacitating the minds of soldiers within a circumscribed area.

Applications of microwave technology in espionage were available for over 25 years. In a meeting in Berkeley of the American Association for the Advancement of Science as early as 1965, Professor J. Anthony Deutsch of New York University, provided an important segment of research in the field of memory control. In layman terms, Professor Deutsch indicated that the mind is a transmitter and if too much information is received, like too many vehicles on a crowded freeway, the brain ceases to transmit. The Professor indicated that an excess of acetyl choline in the brain can interfere with the memory process and control. He indicated excess amounts of acetyl choline can be artificially produced, through both the administration of drugs or through the use of radio waves. The process is called Electronic Dissolution of Memory (EDOM). The memory transmission can be stopped for as long as the radio signal continues.

As a result, the awareness of the person skips over those minutes during which he is subjected to the radio signal. Memory is distorted, and time-orientation is destroyed.

posted on Jul, 8 2014 @ 12:05 AM
Yes you have delved deep into the definition of a word...

It is part of a bigger world...
Psychological Operations=PSYOP

The 3 letter agencies are very sophisticated,... therefore you need to be aware of their capabilities to start to understand what is not only possible, but probable...

posted on Jul, 8 2014 @ 12:12 AM
so let't be clear: anyone can challenge or negate your mental competency and following, rights, civilly, herein…
and this is what that may mean to you. And this is how it may be done.

Understand, that once these civil rights are removed from you as a person, it means, basically, open season upon you, as though you are a deer in the hunting headlights. If you have children, it means legally, they are tantamount to Bambi laws, as in nature: there is nothing you can do, and your brethren are for hunting, etc.

This is real, true and the law. This is where we are currently living. Are you comfortable with this?

posted on Jul, 8 2014 @ 12:14 AM
a reply to: coastlinekid

Yes, well I read threads and responses often that seem to not understand the world in which we are living, so….
this is my part to explain where and how FU'd up it really is…..
thanks for your comment.

posted on Jul, 8 2014 @ 12:19 AM
The point is not only how tenuous your legal sanity rights are, and how easily they can be removed, but how tenuous, as an individual, your entire identity, history and life experience is….how easily it can be negated and then removed from you, despite the fact you thought it originated from and within and without you (and that it was "original" in the first place) and then how easily your mind can be programmed and reprogrammed, etc., ad nauseum, to create something totally antithetical to what you thought your entire life's experience stood for, and you worked for…..etc….

The microcosm and macrocosm in real time…..this is your life, and not. And then you're judged to be not in touch with reality, and what this, then, may lead to, as a result.
edit on 8-7-2014 by tetra50 because: (no reason given)

posted on Jul, 8 2014 @ 01:04 AM

edit on 8-7-2014 by Nephalim because: (no reason given)

posted on Jul, 8 2014 @ 01:14 AM
a reply to: Nephalim

thanks nephalim. good to see you here, though i don't know what you wrote, cause i didn't show up in time, as I was dealing with my interdiction….lol

posted on Jul, 8 2014 @ 01:58 AM
a reply to: tetra50

i was surprised to see that there actually, wasnt sure what to say about it. Sounds scary.

posted on Jul, 10 2014 @ 02:42 PM

originally posted by: coastlinekid
Yes you have delved deep into the definition of a word...

It is part of a bigger world...
Psychological Operations=PSYOP

The 3 letter agencies are very sophisticated,... therefore you need to be aware of their capabilities to start to understand what is not only possible, but probable...

Yes. I guess, though, the point I was striving to make with covering its many definitions, is, this word describes a process by which, if one of these things in one sector of life happens to you, taking into account, say, the law enforcement/three letter agency definition of interdiction…..then, the interdiction process would follow one through all walks of life which are fundamental: i.e., from a law enforcement perspective, then to the religious institution, all the way to the "civil" death of interdiction, describing a total loss of rights, both socially and individually.

Three letter agencies tend to refer to people as "assets?", correct? Assets implies the objectification of a human being. What's described by NSA interdiction, is aumented electronics or other purchases, on their way to the purchaser's destination. But what if, regarding humans as assets, then extended to human beings being augmented on the way to their destination? If you augmented a human "asset" and turned them into a live reporting, remotely accessible, walking, "device," the augmentation would also be employable as a manipulation tool to later nullify the same individual, and get them interdicted by clergy, and later in their personal life….perhaps, when they were no longer of use, or to control them, etc.

posted on May, 24 2015 @ 02:24 PM
Wake up, people. You've all been interdicted.

top topics


log in