It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JonMel77
"scientists are discovering new species of animals all the time"
"whole species appearing on the planet would be quite an event"
A contradiction in terms?
Also my cat just rocked up at the door one day, let itself in and hasn't stopped eating and sleeping ever since. Maybe this is how all new species are born?
originally posted by: DupontDeux
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Good points, but!!
IF creationism is true, then it stands to reason that many sciences are wrong - including geology and physics upon which we heavily rely, when dating something.
Without reliable dating measures we have no way of knowing if certain animals did or did not live in the same time period.
If we have no way of knowing that, then God could very well have created animals only once.
So my question for the Creationists is, if evolution isn't true and God just magics species whole onto the planet, where is the evidence of this occurring? Why has no one seen this happen?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: JonMel77
Possibly, I'm just trying to follow the Creationist logic.
In order to answer...i have to... *lowers own IQ to that of a rock*
So I ask again, where is the evidence that new species are being created and deposited on the earth?
originally posted by: luciddream
a reply to: uncommitted
Then your arguement is with Theory of Abiogenesis, not Evolution.