It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dear ATS Ancient Astronaut-ers....I have a present for you ;)

page: 4
41
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 03:42 PM
link   
a reply to: zazzafrazz
Whether fake or authentic - it's interesting.
Trying to find the 'archaeological site' is not yielding much promise - but...it's an interesting area, anyway.




posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 03:49 PM
link   
a reply to: zazzafrazz



Dear lord. He said IT WAS my source


No he didn't say it was your source.

In fact he said nothing and posted the link.



a reply to: Armadall
awakening-media-database.e-monsite.com...



Sorry nothing here about your source. Unless that really is your source.



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 03:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Crakeur
a reply to: zazzafrazz
I wonder if those are the documents that are referenced here:



As Phillips wrote, "[Julia-Levy] represented that he would produce actual artifacts, tangible proof of an agreement between the Mayans and extraterrestrials. He stated that he would produce archaeological papers, which he did. However [Theriot] testified that she later learned that they were falsified."


source
www.hollywoodreporter.com...

Theriot and Julia Levy were making a movie and there was a dispute over the money and the process. They went into arbitration and Phillips, above, was the arbitrator. Theriot stated, in court, that Julia Levy falsified government documents.
Yeah just saw that article, not sure? Did you skyve off Spanish classes like me in school


Im still not sure this Facebook page 'artefacts' are part of the levy 'artefact' list or another one.
Currently looking around for it.



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 03:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: zazzafrazz



Dear lord. He said IT WAS my source


No he didn't say it was your source.

In fact he said nothing and posted the link.



a reply to: Armadall
awakening-media-database.e-monsite.com...






Sorry nothing here about your source. Unless that really is your source.


he was replying to the poster asking for the source, can we get over the phage post...when he comes back online Im sure he will clarify.



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 03:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: WanDash
a reply to: zazzafrazz
Whether fake or authentic - it's interesting.
Trying to find the 'archaeological site' is not yielding much promise - but...it's an interesting area, anyway.



Exactly! that says plenty right? If we can't find the find site or the context of the artefacts found, then it starts to get pushed into the hoax side of things....



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:00 PM
link   
a reply to: zazzafrazz
Well - it says something - and, it generally leads away from the truth.
On the other hand, I am familiar with the methodology of informing of a 'find'...and fictionalizing enough information to protect the find until some guarantee is in place to maintain a 'stake' in the find.
So - it's not a debunker...automatically.



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:05 PM
link   
a reply to: WanDash

True to an extent.
Sometimes you can't disclose a site for safety.
I know someone in Panama who has found quite simply the most extraordinary site, possibly one of the greatest ever ( have privately shared it with Byrd who also nearly had heart failure and fainted from the artefacts)

The site is privately registered with the government and kept secret due to "treasure hunters" moving in. They also have armed guards, so yes not always will a site be divulged until it is fully excavated.

I am DYING to do a thread on it, one day, I just can't yet!
edit on 20-6-2014 by zazzafrazz because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: zazzafrazz




he was replying to the poster asking for the source, can we get over the phage post...when he comes back online Im sure he will clarify.


And in that exchange was it ever said it was your source?

Because you may want to apologize to him for making the comment that he said it was your source.

Also remember he was asked for a source, which he provided that wasn't your source.



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

whatever



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: WanDash

...True to an extent.
Sometimes you can't disclose a site for safety.

I wasn't just referring to archaeological 'finds'... Many people have lost a lot, when seeking expertise &/or funding to develop a 'find' in many fields/endeavors. But, that's neither here, nor there.


I know someone in Panama who has found quite simply the most extraordinary site, possibly one of the greatest ever...
...I am DYING to do a thread on it, one day, I just can't yet!

Can't wait!
Gotta find a way of broadcasting loudly, when you're ready!



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:17 PM
link   
so can anyone speak spanish for us?



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:19 PM
link   
a reply to: zazzafrazz




whatever


Then putting words in a man's mouth is okay for you?

Or is it because he provided something that refutes your OP?



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: WanDash
a reply to: zazzafrazz
- but...it's an interesting area, anyway.



It appears to be on the perimeter of Aztlan Cerro del Toro and cowsheds Jalisco. (well thats a google translate from Facebook lol)

there appear to be Geometric shapes that can be seen from satellite, however I can't see if this is the location they say these 'artefacts' were found.
www.facebook.com...
edit on 20-6-2014 by zazzafrazz because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: zazzafrazz




whatever


Then putting words in a man's mouth is okay for you?

Or is it because he provided something that refutes your OP?

Did it refute the OP?
Did I put words in his mouth?
Or did he put them in mine?
like i said let phage speak for himself.....you're weirdly obsessing so Ill answer him at this point not you.



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Ancient ETs were shown and depicted differently. Their aircraft looked different. These are most likely modern renditions.

Fakes by Klaus Dona - link

Harte



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:41 PM
link   
a reply to: zazzafrazz




If he wants to say they are the same batch of fakes, he can post it as that, not claim that was my source as its not.


Is that not what he did, and could you please show where he claimed that it was the same source as yours?



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Harte

I just watched a few videos on the Dona fakes, and these look to not be on there, I saw one of them only the Mayan Artefacts site but that's it.
We should go back to the exercise of trying to find the source of the face book groups 'artefacts', and how to assess if they are fake or real.



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
...there appear to be Geometric shapes that can be seen from satellite, however I can't see if this is the location they say these 'artefacts' were found.
...

Plenty of places to hide, if it is...
I'm still searching.



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 04:57 PM
link   
a reply to: zazzafrazz

Hello Good to see these again..

You can find some information about them on this thread if you are interested..


Amazing new Mayan artifacts prove the extraterrestrial connection between the Maya and their galactic visitors, r


Newly Discovered Artifacts May Prove Mayans Had Alien Contact!
www.abovetopsecret.com...

purp..

edit on 20-6-2014 by purplemer because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2014 @ 05:02 PM
link   
a reply to: purplemer

Howdy Purps.

Again I can't see these are the same batch of 'artefacts'. If someone can find somewhere that has the Facebooks "artefacts" listed in the OP (they have posted some of the Dona fakes once ) in the Dona fakes that would be great.
Thanks z

edit on 20-6-2014 by zazzafrazz because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join