It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Akragon
Well again, theres no connection to Jesus... These paintings were painted over a thousand years after his death
Surely the book of Enoch spoke of extra terrestrials as well
If you read a little history and dont just stare at pictures you will find out that there have always been "others" amongst us according to legends.
djz3ro
Akragon
Well again, theres no connection to Jesus... These paintings were painted over a thousand years after his death
Awesome, now we're getting somewhere. So you can prove there's no connection to Jesus?
To be fair the while Bible was written by man after the time Jesus was supposedly around (you know this, right?). So if you think like that the Bible really had nothing to do with Jesus either, which is logical...
originally posted by: AttilaTheHun
a reply to: Akragon
Well he could easily have been partially alien. He could have been created through artificial insemnation and this is how Mary stayed a virgin, but at that time it seemed like a miracle. You just have to replace the word angel in the Bible with extraterrestrial and it all makes sense. Angels are depicted with wings hinting at their ability to fly (leave the earth). Jesus had all sorts of otherwordly abilities like telepathy and was more advanced in his thinking (thanks to the alien genes).
originally posted by: SyxPak
reply to post by Pauligirl
Hi. First off, I'm not trying to jump your ass about what I'm about to write.I just want to try to make a point, of my opinion. I'm with Bilk22 on that I see a connection to Jesus to Aliens. Like stated, why paint what was NOT there? I mentioned in my Post to the OP at bottom of Page 4 here the same thing. If there were alien craft at the time of Jesus with NO connection of the 2, then WHY paint the Craft in a painting of Jesus. There must have been a connection, otherwise the painting would not make sense. Plus if Aliens/Craft were not seen before, do You really think the artists would have been able to just make them up?
Even Sci-Fi writers of today, I believe usually had some point of reference to an object or idea, from which they were/are able to perceive an object /idea of the future. IE: Like taking a standard Pistol, then turning it into a laser firing weapon...... Syx.
originally posted by: AttilaTheHun
a reply to: Akragon
Well he could easily have been partially alien. He could have been created through artificial insemnation and this is how Mary stayed a virgin, but at that time it seemed like a miracle. You just have to replace the word angel in the Bible with extraterrestrial and it all makes sense. Angels are depicted with wings hinting at their ability to fly (leave the earth). Jesus had all sorts of otherwordly abilities like telepathy and was more advanced in his thinking (thanks to the alien genes).
originally posted by: gort51
Do you really think, paintings done over 1000 years after the event, actually portray the Real image of the time?
No of course Not, they are the imaginings of the painter.....His imagination (dictated somewhat by his commissioner or the Church).
Dont you think people would have said to Rembrandts student, "excuse me sire, but what is that round cloud in the sky, that you have painted?". What would he have said?...."oh well yes of course I was there on the mountain in BC500, that is a 20th century UFO of course you ninny!!, Didnt you know John the Baptist was an Alien?" They are just images from the painters mind, portraying spiritual notions to them, or their interpretations. .
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
originally posted by: AttilaTheHun
a reply to: Akragon
You would have to prove he existed in the first place (no records keeping as Roman Tax rolls go), he wasnt born in Bethlehem but in Nazareth, everything is wrong. This whole born of a virgin is nothing but prior dogma from Horus's time; a BORROWED theosophy, a MYTH inserted into that time period. Look at the similarities of Horus and Jesus creation (they are so much the same some think Jesus was Horus reincarnated). If the being Jesus actually existed, he would have been a human holding all 9 dimensional abilities. I know of the personage you speak of and thinks of itself as a used shill/shellgame to promote as an icon a false Christian/Catholic dogma of Pauls creation. Alien genes? He was an Essene and knew perfectly all that the Egyptian Mystery schools had to offer. Telepathy was taken away 400,000 years ago. He did know how to transmute matter. Alien genes have nothing to do with his abilities that were of schools hidden from view: ie the Quabala (the Hebrew slole without understanding what it exactly was). Telepathy is not natural anymore for the human, but one can develop it and speak to your higherselves. What I find very funny is that you dont realize you yourself are most likely born of alien origins accelerated human growth systems, what; do you really think you evolved from the simian? They were failed byproducts of a test lab potencial slave specie allowed to continue to exist (you want to see inequities; look at the fate of the great apes and what they must endure as being 'almost humans'). Youve no idea the shennigans that have played out here regarding profligations, experimentations with/of various specie developments. Jesus idea was an insert to change a paradigm, so was Mohammed, so was Buddha. Some actually wrote things down Jesus being the one most highly educated of the three chose not to do so; WHY? If Jesus is infact a hybrid so was Horus.
AttilaTheHun Jesus, Horus, Romulus, Krishna, Dionysus, Zoroaster and the list goes on. They all could have been hybrids or it could be the same strory told over and over with different names.