posted on Mar, 6 2014 @ 09:04 AM
reply to post by AutumnWitch657
Well he does have a point in saying this. We all know that no plane hit the Pentagon. No plane crashed in Shanksville. And the witness testimonies on
the ground near the towers are a bit sketchy as well.
Subjects like these warrant discussion and not thrown in the LOL bin like the Sandy Hook ones always are!
Lear has a valid point about how these planes were able to pull off impossible moves. The official narrative said these planes at 1 - 2000 feet were
going at 584 miles per hour. Pilots For 9/11 truth say this is rubbish. Lear says this is absolutely rubbish. And I have a friend that flies for
British Airways and he says that is absolute BS.
I would tend to agree with the ones that know what they are talking about.
And how do these planes slice through the towers like butter without leaving a single trace of themselves on the ground and or in the rubble? That's
impossible too. Just like the FBI BS story of the hijackers passport surviving a supposed impact, explosion, heat, flames, the complete annihilation
of the Terrorist Carrier and the collapse of the tower. The FBI lie of the indestructible passport compared the actual indestructible can't find it
anywhere black box recorder.
Yeah right!! I've always known that 9/11 was a False Flag attack. It's too obvious especially when the Government and the Lamestream media tell you
silly stories of fold up origami planes at the Pentagon!
How far into the rabbit hole this goes regarding the no plane theory I don't know. But a lot of researchers not just Lear have said exactly the same
Anything John Lear says will probably be dumped in the LOL bin anyway after his confrontation about Sandy Hook a few years back but John Lear is
absolutely correct in what he says about the characteristics of a Boeing 737/757 airliner. What happened on 9/11 was impossible!!