It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Personally, I'm excited beyond belief. I've waited my whole life for something like this. I only know one fact about radiation and it is this: Radiation + Human = Superhero (or villain, im gonna need a sweet 'stache). I'm gonna be flyin around this b#$*, X-ray peepin at cuties in the shower, and all that good stuff in no time.
corblimeyguvnor
reply to post by Aazadan
Facts please, it was not because of what happened in WW2. This was 3 years prior to the outbreak of WW2 and was the atrocities commited during the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937, especially at what happened during the march to and capture of Nanking.
Frexmil2
Just saw this on Facebook, Figured I should post it.
According to Putin, two nuclear explosions have happend underground.
www.eutimes.net...
Putin Orders Saudi Arabia “Destroyed” After Volgograd Terror Strikes
clay2 baraka
Frexmil2
Just saw this on Facebook, Figured I should post it.
According to Putin, two nuclear explosions have happend underground.
www.eutimes.net...
From that same source:
Putin Orders Saudi Arabia “Destroyed” After Volgograd Terror Strikes
riiiight..
[Tepco] said Tuesday the highest level of beta ray-emitting radioactive materials such as strontium was detected in water collected Sunday from an observation well [...] The level of such substances in the well water stood at 710,000 becquerels per liter, according to TEPCO [...] and marked a record high for the fourth straight day. The well is about 15 meters north of the storage tank, from which some 300 tons of radioactive water leaked [...]
bigbiy666
This is purely a stupid question, but one considers what's Best for all.
Q. Would a small to medium size nuclear detonation above fukishima assist in a kind. Of clean up of the area? I know the two are almost the same thing, but would it toast the mess just leaving a Hiroshima/nagaski event without the world having 89 tons of plutonium going into the atmosphere???
poet1b
reply to post by vkey08
Actually I was disagreeing with the link, and pointing out the major holes in the claims.
Whatever you think of the source, it was, IMO, trying to defend the situation in Fukushima, not produce the facts.
Maybe who you think is against the PTB is actually for the PTB.