It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
itsallgonenow
reply to post by jaffo
No they did not, we killed mostly civilians AFTER they have surrendered!
The Japanese government will soon be approving legislation, that would make the leaking of information about Fukushima a state offense, carrying a hefty criminal sentence.
The page shows a photograph of Reactor 3 steaming vigorously to lend support to the contention above.
The problem? It is a photo from March 2011 right after the building blew up.
jaffo
grey580
reply to post by jaffo
Is there an "official" news source other than some blog?
I'd like to see this being reported officially
Unfortunately, no. The mainstream is completely ignoring this so they can talk about Duck Dynasty.
justreleased
Look at your history. I don't think China wants a 100,000,000 Japs.
jhn7537
reply to post by vkey08
Maybe putting a nuclear power plant on the coast of your country, when you're prone to large EQ's and Tsunami's probably wasn't the wisest decision they've made either...
Alekto
justreleased
Look at your history. I don't think China wants a 100,000,000 Japs.
A lot of people find the term 'Jap' racist and derogatory. I ask you change your post.
justreleased
reply to post by jaffo
Wow the revenge of Japan. We nuke them and then "Fuku - shima" nukes everybody.
How ironic?
jaffo
Lol, for sure. Although Japan earned their nukings.
rupertg
Shut down every nuclear power plant.
Alekto
jhn7537
reply to post by vkey08
Maybe putting a nuclear power plant on the coast of your country, when you're prone to large EQ's and Tsunami's probably wasn't the wisest decision they've made either...
The whole of Japan is 'prone' to earthquakes.
All of it.
Where would you have them build one?
Alekto
rupertg
Shut down every nuclear power plant.
Enjoy living in the dark ages.
Emerys
reply to post by jaffo
Where is the safest place to go!?
jhn7537
I wouldn't have them build it then, if your country is so unstable to catastrophic disasters (ie EQ's and Tsunami's), you would think they would look at different energy sources that don't carry as much risk. Maybe wind energy, water, or solar energy would have been the better direction to go in... I'm not an expert on energy, but I know there is a great risk associated with nuclear energy and building plants in unstable locations just sounds like a recipe for disaster.
The more I learn about nuclear energy, the more I hate it, not just on Japan's coast, but all around the world. Even in my neck of the woods... If there's a "safer" source out there, I feel all countries should be using it, because the risks, IMO, far outweigh the reward we get from it.