It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
kauskau
brazenalderpadrescorpio
reply to post by midnightstars
One of her last books explains why Seth couldn't or chose not to actively intervene in her illness. I could do it myself, but the book would explain it much better.
can you tell me where? because often people tell me exactly that: "why couldnt she use what she learned from seth"..
its the same with the husband of esther hicks..
mistersmith
reply to post by midnightstars
Am I a follower of Osho ?
I owe a great deal to Osho, and just thinking of him fills me with gratitude.
On a semantic point, he said not to "follow" him, as he was not going anywhere -- but your meaning is clear, and yes, he was and is a tremendous inspiration and comfort through his writing.
I know he is criticised on many counts, but I sincerely hope that such material does not sully this delightful thread.
I'm sorry that your empathy with Jane proves to be a barrier, through the books I've come to see that in a wider context.
I see pain and illness as part of the journey, and Seth's role to help us through, not enable us to avoid it.
I sense a resentment against Seth which you could drop if you chose, without any unfairness towards Jane. She would want you to read the books.
With sincere best wishes,
mistersmith.
brazenalderpadrescorpio
reply to post by midnightstars
One of her last books explains why Seth couldn't or chose not to actively intervene in her illness. I could do it myself, but the book would explain it much better.
kauskau
brazenalderpadrescorpio
reply to post by midnightstars
One of her last books explains why Seth couldn't or chose not to actively intervene in her illness. I could do it myself, but the book would explain it much better.
can you tell me where? because often people tell me exactly that: "why couldnt she use what she learned from seth"..
its the same with the husband of esther hicks..
midnightstars
kauskau
brazenalderpadrescorpio
reply to post by midnightstars
One of her last books explains why Seth couldn't or chose not to actively intervene in her illness. I could do it myself, but the book would explain it much better.
can you tell me where? because often people tell me exactly that: "why couldnt she use what she learned from seth"..
its the same with the husband of esther hicks..
Yes, exactly, Kauskau.
I'm glad my instincts were right about Esther Hicks and "Abraham." Although in the Hicks case, it might be intentional fraud. I don't think Jane Roberts was a fraud, just misled, as many mediums are.
I don't like the way they lied and hid the real nature of Jerry Hicks illness (died of cancer Nov 18, 2011). He did not use the "Abraham" methods of healing, but went with conventional chemo. So much for his faith in the "Abraham" teachings.
brazenalderpadrescorpio
reply to post by johnnychicken
Could you give a detailed account about that fire and how it related to coordination points?
kauskau
midnightstars
kauskau
brazenalderpadrescorpio
reply to post by midnightstars
One of her last books explains why Seth couldn't or chose not to actively intervene in her illness. I could do it myself, but the book would explain it much better.
can you tell me where? because often people tell me exactly that: "why couldnt she use what she learned from seth"..
its the same with the husband of esther hicks..
Yes, exactly, Kauskau.
I'm glad my instincts were right about Esther Hicks and "Abraham." Although in the Hicks case, it might be intentional fraud. I don't think Jane Roberts was a fraud, just misled, as many mediums are.
I don't like the way they lied and hid the real nature of Jerry Hicks illness (died of cancer Nov 18, 2011). He did not use the "Abraham" methods of healing, but went with conventional chemo. So much for his faith in the "Abraham" teachings.
hm i am still not quite sure about all that. Because i see for myself how hard it is to "trust" in new concepts. For me for example there is no doubt that bashar is the real deal and knows the truth. But still i am not following the idea of "always following my highest joy"..because i am still afraid that this could bring damage for my carreer...
And when it comes to illness its a whole different thing: to conquer your fears and try something new is not easy..even when you are the "medium of the good news" itself..
The medium still is not the source...thats what we should not forget.
But i didnt like the way esther handled the situation afterwards.but I never was a big fan o abraham hicks.. Is not my "vibe":..The way esther speaks is not a clear sign of a real channeling for me..so thats why i stopped listening to it.
edit on 29-10-2013 by kauskau because: (no reason given)
kauskau
reply to post by thebtheb
jeah i also dont linke the price model of darryl anka..but that does not change for me the validity of the source he is channeling.
The channel is a human ...so..he has flaws..
but i get what you are saying