It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Jet engines do not produce condensation trails except under extremely rare conditions, and these will be too short and too high to be seen from the group. In fact, most people will never see a true condensation trail in their entire lives
You never answered my question.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by SMOKINGGUN2012
You never answered my question.
Are you seriously saying that
Jet engines do not produce condensation trails except under extremely rare conditions, and these will be too short and too high to be seen from the group. In fact, most people will never see a true condensation trail in their entire lives
Yes or no?
..2) They imply that 100% of the trails you see ARE IN FACT "chemical aerosols being sprayed from jets." ...
Originally posted by SMOKINGGUN2012
reply to post by network dude
I just answered that 2 posts up......
There are many factors to consider before I would conclude it has any accuracy.
Originally posted by stars15k
reply to post by SMOKINGGUN2012
..2) They imply that 100% of the trails you see ARE IN FACT "chemical aerosols being sprayed from jets." ...
Ah, there is the rub. They cannot possibly be sprayed. I believe that many believers misunderstand how very large contrails are. When you see a 'trail from horizon to horizon, it is about 200 miles lone. Consider how often the jet is almost invisible because it is so far away, and the trail is much larger than a jet....several hundred feet. Then these can spread. So what you see as a fairly thin line is actually huge.
A single cumulus cloud, of average size, what you would see on a nice summer day has 550 tons of water in it. If you extrapolate that amount to a 200 mile cloud, or even a mile long cloud, you would need an entire fleet of tankers to spray just one.
So for the purpose of this calculation I am going to use a "contrail induced cirrus" that is 100m thick, 1km wide and 100km long - not an unsual size for a persitent contrails - that means it is 100*1000*100,000m = 10,000,000,000 cubic metres (10 Trillion cubic metres).
At the lower figure from the 1st link of 0.02 grams per cubic metre that is 10 Trillion x 0.02 grams, and then divided by 1000 to get Kg, and 1000 again to get tonnes - a "mere" 200 tons of water!
If we are all so stupid to believe in this topic at all, then why do you and others waste so much time and effort in threads like this to debunk our discussion?
Originally posted by SMOKINGGUN2012
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
Objection your honor......asked and answered........object sustained ........
This is one article that is going to throw the "debunkers" into an absolute tizzy.
"Tizzy".........see the post above yours and others...........I don't give a flying leap what the heck any of you believe or not. If people want to discuss this article or any other in a rational matter fine. If me or anyone else happens to believe in this topic either wholly or partially that is our right and if it drives any of you into a "tizzy" too bad.
If you are going to ask the same question over and over you might get a sarcastic reply.
I do find it EXTREMELY curious how practically any post placed in this forum gets instantly and viciously attacked almost as if the intent is to dissuade ANY discussion of the topic AT ALL. That is blatantly obvious to me and I am sure others here as well.
Originally posted by SMOKINGGUN2012
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
I do find it EXTREMELY curious how practically any post placed in this forum gets instantly and viciously attacked almost as if the intent is to dissuade ANY discussion of the topic AT ALL. That is blatantly obvious to me and I am sure others here as well.