It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by InverseLookingGlass
I think it boils down to a single, binary poll question:
Would you support delaying or canceling elections if you were certain a the group that assumes power is the only one that can save the nation from total destruction?
Originally posted by InverseLookingGlass
I think it boils down to a single, binary poll question:
Would you support delaying or canceling elections if you were certain that the group that assumes power is the only one that can save the nation from total destruction?edit on 24-5-2013 by InverseLookingGlass because: syntax error
Would you support delaying or canceling elections if you were certain that the group that assumes power is the only one that can save the nation from total destruction?
Originally posted by InverseLookingGlass
I think it boils down to a single, binary poll question:
Would you support delaying or canceling elections if you were certain that the group that assumes power is the only one that can save the nation from total destruction?edit on 24-5-2013 by InverseLookingGlass because: syntax error
•Less than 1.3% of the population voted, eligibility to vote depended on property ownership requirements.
•Only 10 states participated in the election.
•Alexander Hamilton schemed to ensure that John Adams would get fewer votes to be Vice President than Washington for President. Hamilton worried about “that defect in the constitution which renders it possible that the man intended for Vice-President may in fact turn up President.”