It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by peck420
Marriage is a title. That is it. It has no actual law of it's own.
Originally posted by peck420
If you had any understanding of the actual law itself, you would realise that removing 'marriage' from the government is the simple solution. The laws are already there to handle the rest, let us actually use them.
Originally posted by markosity1973
Originally posted by mindlessbrainpower89
Why do you think Jews where Kippahs on their heads? It shows their marriage with G-d and reminds them that there is a G-d above.
Hang on a minute here.....
Kippahs are worn by men and you are saying that they wear them to show their marriage to God. God is a dude , Jesus reaffirmed this when he taught us to call him father....
This would mean that Jews believe in the ultimate form of gay marriage - the men are all marrying a male God!
I can go with the brides of Christ thing with nuns, but you have just shot your own argument down in flames there.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Personally, I'd rather get rid of the box and let people do as they wish.
Originally posted by mindlessbrainpower89
reply to post by Annee
Okay, I'll bet you it will change eventually.
Originally posted by mindlessbrainpower89
reply to post by mindlessbrainpower89
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by mindlessbrainpower89
reply to post by mindlessbrainpower89
en.wikipedia.org...
Fetishes?
That has nothing to do with sexual orientation.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by mindlessbrainpower89
reply to post by Annee
Okay, I'll bet you it will change eventually.
What?
200 years from now, when people understand sexual orientation is a completely natural occurance, and don't care anymore?
Kind of like when the religious once thought seizures were being possessed by the devil.
GOOD: You're a member of a growing group of psychologists who say pedophilia should be considered a sexual orientation. Why?
Quinsey: Part of the definition of pedophilia is a person has a preference for a particular kind of partner. [...] pedophiles, unlike other men, show substantial sexual interest in prepubescent children. As far as we know—and many people have tried—these sexual interests are not modifiable by any method that’s been tried yet. So it appears like pedophilia is a sexual orientation. [...] You also can’t modify that interest; it’s stable through adulthood, just like pedophilia. cogsci.stackexchange.com...
Originally posted by Annee
reply to post by mindlessbrainpower89
Churches in America can refuse to marry anyone for whatever reason. And NO, that us not going to change.
They are not required to give you a reason.
The special extra protection clauses the religious are insisting upon, are really kind of redundant.
Originally posted by mindlessbrainpower89
Originally posted by Annee
reply to post by mindlessbrainpower89
Churches in America can refuse to marry anyone for whatever reason. And NO, that us not going to change.
They are not required to give you a reason.
The special extra protection clauses the religious are insisting upon, are really kind of redundant.
If I am not mistaken, haven't there been plenty of discussions in the media about how gay couples SHOULD have ceremonial rights? I expect you to be an adult about this and tell the truth. If you don't, I'll prove you wrong just so everyone can see how foolish you are and the rest of those who follow the leader.
Originally posted by mindlessbrainpower89
reply to post by Annee
Wow! Great hardcore facts that came from a place where people ask questions to the general public and get answers from the general public! Great Facts! Anyone could be a researcher. By the way, if you are a student in political science does that make you a politician?
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by mindlessbrainpower89
Originally posted by Annee
reply to post by mindlessbrainpower89
Churches in America can refuse to marry anyone for whatever reason. And NO, that us not going to change.
They are not required to give you a reason.
The special extra protection clauses the religious are insisting upon, are really kind of redundant.
If I am not mistaken, haven't there been plenty of discussions in the media about how gay couples SHOULD have ceremonial rights? I expect you to be an adult about this and tell the truth. If you don't, I'll prove you wrong just so everyone can see how foolish you are and the rest of those who follow the leader.
There are plenty of churches very happy to marry same sex couples.
Gays are just people (individuals) --- do you think those with strong religious belief just abandon them?