It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Do you even know which countries got the big oil contracts?
Originally posted by DaTroof
So shooting someone to death, not a war crime.
Eating, war crime.
Originally posted by seabag
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by seabag
To blame US aggression or oil aspirations is a bit naïve
I would put that in my signature, but its full.
Go for it!
It is naive. People who keep saying that sound like kool aid drinking parrots. How great did that theory stand up in Iraq? Do you even know which countries got the big oil contracts? It wasn't US!
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by seabag
Do you even know which countries got the big oil contracts?
So you admit it was about the oil then, thanks.
By the way, "countries" don't get oil contracts, International Corporations do.
Actually It had more to do with the petro dollar then oil itself!
Though there are a bunch of other reasons like establishing US bases for invasion into other countries trying to reject the petro dollar!
Also establishing central banks and creating some pipelines! I am not sure what else
it had to do with but I am damn sure it isn't about freeing the peoples of the Middle East!
its frigging cute that we give terrorist cannibals weapons and arms
Originally posted by DeeKlassified
I find the BBC's reporting a bit strange. Normally they are complicit, but lately they have reported that the rebels are responsible for the use of chemical weapons, connected to Al Qaeda, and now reporting this.
That's 3 bad things about the rebels they have reported, yet we (the UK) are still sending the rebels all the things they need to fight the Syrian government!
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by thePharaoh
its frigging cute that we give terrorist cannibals weapons and arms
I can't even get past your FIRST LINE because the rest is based on false premise.
When did US provide cannibals with arms??
Source please!
Originally posted by Kuroodo
I just finnished watching the actual video,
The man barely puts it in his mouth when the video ends.
Not sure if they ended the filming right there because he didnt really eat it because it was just for attention/to start things or if he actually did eat the heart....
Nice try at deflecting my response.
To the victor goes the spoils....though that certainly wasn't the case for US in Iraq, was it?
If you disagree then tell me how US benefited.
To the victor goes the spoils....though that certainly wasn't the case for US in Iraq, was it? If you disagree then tell me how US benefited.
Originally posted by DaTroof
So shooting someone to death, not a war crime.
Eating, war crime.
Originally posted by seabag[/i
What pipelines????. . .
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by seabag
Do you even know which countries got the big oil contracts?
So you admit it was about the oil then, thanks.
By the way, "countries" don't get oil contracts, International Corporations do.