It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neformore
reply to post by inverslyproportional
I'm sorry, but you aren't living in the real world where bad things happen if you think that.
You react, and you do it quickly, or you die.
I am amazed at the utter naivety of people posting here. Its like people seem to think its like the movies where the bad guys are poor shots who always miss, or someone fires a warning shot, or there are ways to dodge bullets. Its actually scary to read how people see this and quite disturbing.
Life or death.
Ask the family of cop who got killed whether bad things happen. Maybe he could have handled it differently huh?
Oh wait, he didn't get chance to.
Which person is the suspect with the loaded weapon pointing at you? Do you know?
Originally posted by Covertblack
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Everyone should own a megaphpone and if cops show up on your street everyone begin giving the police commands to return to their vehicles and leave the area.
Use that in conjunction with full -size paper blowups of persons standing with M16s in windows.
Good luck finding neighbors with that kind of sense of adventure though.....
Which will directly help a murderer, rapist, terrorist, run free. I guess you have to chose your companions.
It's that the police are now facing military style weapons, which means they need to to also adapt.
Originally posted by neformore
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
What would you have them do?
I'm curious.
I see people condeming this whole thing over and over - so what would you have the LEO's do in this situation?
Originally posted by kosmicjack
reply to post by neformore
That's not good enough by our Constitutional standards. Boston/Cambridge/Watertown is/was not a war zone.
If there was not probable cause to believe Tsarnaev was in one of a few specific houses in the area, there most certainly was not probable cause to believe he could be in any of the houses in area. They had no idea where he was...thus no probable cause for such extreme measures as reflected in the pic.
All citizens in area cannot be considered suspects, there must be reasonable cause.
Originally posted by neformore
reply to post by kosmicjack
People died, in bombings, through an act of terrorism, carried out by people who have no regard for human safety and wellbeing whatsoever.
And you expect the LEO's and anti-terror people to observe niceties when trying to catch that person?
What if they'd killed again, or blow somewhere else up?
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Originally posted by Covertblack
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Everyone should own a megaphpone and if cops show up on your street everyone begin giving the police commands to return to their vehicles and leave the area.
Use that in conjunction with full -size paper blowups of persons standing with M16s in windows.
Good luck finding neighbors with that kind of sense of adventure though.....
Which will directly help a murderer, rapist, terrorist, run free. I guess you have to chose your companions.
How would that help a criminal, was he found hiding in a house?
Sticking up for our rights is helping terrorists run free, got it chief.
Everybody lay down and get steamrolled by the law for our own good.
Never mind that the suspects were purported terrorists.
You know they were guilty, the media told you they were.
Pesky trials are a waste of taxpayer money too, right?
Originally posted by ivbnu
reply to post by Covertblack
Lets say in the boston area w/ in a 5 mile radias lets guess maybe 200, 500 suspects. its really not a good argument. Th/ey employ 15000 agents, are not lims and lives worth at least checking
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Covertblack
It's that the police are now facing military style weapons, which means they need to to also adapt.
What do you mean, 'now facing military style weapons'?
When did we American citizens suddenly gain some right to more easily possess 'military style weapons'. Since 1934 it has been increasingly difficult to own what the military has for weapons. Unless you know something different than I do.
Originally posted by Danbones
Funny, he can point a gun at you, but you can NOT point a gun at him...
Originally posted by ivbnu
reply to post by Covertblack
I'll see if i can find out how many people were on a watch list for Boston.
I don't think that if it was say 500 that it would have been unreasonable to have an agent tail each one that morning. If they can roll out 9000 troops to look for one kid surly they can spare 500 to tail people.