It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
To understand Zionism and the reaction to it I think we need to look at a bit more history than just WWII. That alone is a foregone conclusion.
Unity of the Jewish People and the centrality of Israel in Jewish life
Ingathering of the Jewish People in its historic homeland, Eretz Israel, through Aliyah from all countries
Strengthening of the State of Israel, based on the prophetic vision of justice and peace
Preservation of the identity of the Jewish People through fostering of Jewish and Hebrew education, and of Jewish spiritual and cultural values
Protection of Jewish rights everywhere
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by ThinkingHuman
The influence of Zionism has been fading since the establishment of the State of Israel, and many of the points of the Jerusalem Program are politically controversial. Rather than use "Zionism" as a buzzword, please specify which aspects of it you find objectionable; this will lead to a more civilized discussion.
Agreed. As a political movement, Zionism arose in response to the systematic oppression of Jews in Central and Eastern Europe. In many places, Jews were not allowed to own land, and their persons subject to continual violence. Long before the Holocaust, Jews were massacred and their property destroyed by mobs whipped into a frenzy by lies and propaganda. The Holocaust was simply the last, most organized pogrom. Zionism was an attempt to create a homeland where the Jewish people could live freely, without persecution or fear of violence. With the establishment of the State of Israel, Zionism had accomplished its primary goal. In 1968, the 28th Zionist Congress adopted what they call the "Jerusalem Program:"
Originally posted by DJW001
Calm down.
I am with you DJW001 that we need to retain relative objectivity. But does not part of the responsibility for inflammatory language lie with the person who created and named this thread? Should not both sides of the ideological divide be subject to the same standard?
Does it not seem like the author of this thread is blowing out of proportion what outside the Middle East hardly seems to exist? Jews have many high positions in the US government, are frequently lawyers, doctors, educators, are known for their hard work, their family ties, their contributions to science, society, charities. If anybody wanted to discriminate against Jews, how could they possibly do so?
Basically, angry, emotional reactions from individuals with no power over government policies are being used to justify and perpetuate the image of Jews as the victim of some kind.
There is probably hate against blacks, against Hindus, against any minority and every majority in every country on earth. Yet Jews have managed to create the image that they have a monopoly on victimhood.
California has passed laws that make it illegal to criticise Israel foreign policy for being "covert anti-semitism" on college campus.
But looking at history I wonder why they did not have "a land of their own" until 1900's?
Why did Abraham have to leave Babylon? Why did Jews have to move to Egypt? Then back to Canaan?
Then to many countries mostly in Europe (rather than power-sharing, integration, simply living peacefully next to each other like so many other ethnicities, migration to an unpopulated area, or immigration to ONE country that welcomes them?).
History tells us that they were persecuted throughout the centuries they stayed in Europe. Why all of a sudden, more than a thousand years later, lay claim to Canaan again?
Do you believe any other group of people is equally entitled to come forward and lay claim to a land where they did not live for more than a thousand years?
What gave Great Britain the right in 1917 to give Palestine to Israel?
What gave the United Nations the right in 1948 to partition Palestine the way they did?
I am not debating the role of the Palestinians, or the Arab neighbors, or the jewish people, or anybody else. I am only addressing the actions of the governments. They simply do not make sense, if you take them at face value. There is something more to it that we are not being told about (I wonder why!). No other people in the world were given the gift of a country!
Before contemplating the policies of the Likkud government I would need to find a satisfactory answer to this dilemma.
Judaism is a religion not a nation nor a country.There is no such a thing as Judaia! as there is no Muslimia! or Christiania!....
Jews never had enough people to make a country of their own...
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by DoorKnobEddie
Calm down. You seem not to understand what I am attempting to do. It is clear that you have objections to some of the more radical policies of the Likkud government, as do I. You have failed to engage the point I have been trying to make: If people who reject the epithet of "Anti-Semitic"wish to substitute a more accurate, less inflammatory title, so be it. To retain objectivity, I submit that anti-Israel posters point to specific policies they object to without resorting to the term "Zionist," which is fraught with connotations of its own.
We can both agree that the intent of this thread was inflammatory.
I can guarantee you that the intent of this thread was not inflammatory.
What was inflammatory were your attempts to derail this thread with off topic accusations.
You seem to be an advocate of censorship when it comes to certain issues and your agenda has been exposed and documented for future discussions.
See you around.
It is quite clear what you are trying to do and you are not doing a very good job at it.
Zionism is an extremist political movement that hides behind Judaism to justify it's actions and forward it's agenda. Your thinly veiled attempts to label us as Jew haters who spew bigotry by using "code words" such as Zionist are quite obvious.
It is YOU who is not understanding the point.
Just in case you missed it in the OP...
Pointing out the problems of the Zionist element within Israel is not Anti-Semitism, and never will be no matter how much people such as yourself try to twist the facts. Logic will always prevail and your tactics will always fail.
Also, you may have missed this in the OP since you seem rather clueless and continue to repeat the same none sense over and over without actually admitting what your true intentions are.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Zionism is an extremist political movement that hides behind Judaism to justify it's actions and forward it's agenda.
In recent years, commentators have argued that contemporary manifestations of anti-Zionism have become a cover for antisemitism, and that a "new antisemitism" rooted in anti-Zionism has emerged . Advocates of this concept argue that much of what purports to be criticism of Israel and Zionism is demonization, and has led to an international resurgence of attacks on Jews and Jewish symbols and an increased acceptance of antisemitic beliefs in public discourse. Critics of the concept argue that the equation of anti-Zionism with antisemitism is used to stifle legitimate criticisms of Israel, and trivializes antisemitism.
Professor Kenneth L. Marcus, former staff director at the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, identifies four main views on the relationship between anti-Zionism and antisemitism, at least in North America
1 anti-Zionism is anti-Semitic in its essence and in most, if not all, of its manifestations
2 anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism are both analytically and historically distinct, but the two ideologies have 3 merged since 1948;[18]
4 anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism remain distinct, but anti-Zionism occasionally crosses the line into "outright 5 5 anti-Semitism",[19] while anti-Semitism often pollutes anti-Zionist discourse;[20]:18 and/or
6 anti-Zionism is analytically distinct from anti-Semitism, but much apparent criticism of Israel or Zionism is in fact a thinly veiled expression of anti-Semitism.
There are some that would disagree with you.
This article may contain inappropriate or misinterpreted citations that do not verify the text. Please help improve this article by checking for inaccuracies. (help, talk, get involved!) (May 2011)
Originally posted by DJW001
California has passed laws that make it illegal to criticise Israel foreign policy for being "covert anti-semitism" on college campus.
I would like to see the text of this alleged law.
Read up on your history.