It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by bknapple32
not sure about "the rest of us", but i'm pretty sure most of us realize that Mr Obama is just as expendable as the next guy. protocols are established to remedy such a conflict of interest.
not saying that it should happen, but it should not be our financial responsibility.
National Security, my buttttt.
surprisingly, no president until the assassination of McKinley demanded such nonsense.
or are you going to suggest that we had no enemies of which to be concerned ??
Originally posted by jpkmets
Exactly. People calling this hypocrisy are not looking at the fact that his children -- the children of any POTUS are absolutely targets for kidnappers or crazies. It's like saying that the fact that Obama himself needs Secret Service is proof that everyone needs to carry.
Originally posted by bknapple32
Shows your ignorance on the topic. WE AREN'T PAYING FOR THIS. It ISN'T our financial responsibility for those guards at their school. Obama is with paying the 35k in tuition.
You want what his kids get for your kids? Fork over the 35 k a year
Originally posted by bknapple32
Originally posted by My_Reality
reply to post by Asktheanimals
I bet all the parents of children in that school, not just the president, would give a plethora of justifications as to why they have the right to protect their kids. Yet, when the average joe wants to do the same, it is resisted with fury.
As to the president. He, and his family, are no more important than anyone else in the USA. He is merely an elected official after all. If he were incapable of serving his post others are scheduled to succeed him. If all of those people are incapable of serving there would be new elections to provide someone for the post. So, I do not buy any argument in regards to guarding the children of elected officials. Politics is dangerous. These people should not have their families guarded night and day, payed for by the peoples tax dollars to boot. I will accept that only when everyones families are protected equally well.
So Mr. President. Why don't you lead by example. Put your beloved daughters in harms way. Expose them to danger while they are in school. Until then, you are a hypocrite.
Yep sure is YOUR reality...
But back in the real world, our elected officials are targets. Sorry that joe six pack isnt. Face it. You arent as important as the president. Thats life. I know youd like to think that your kid is just as important of a target as Obama's...But they arent. They are just an average great kid. Nothing special to a kidnapper though. What are they going to get from you? Certainly not as much as kidnapping the president of the united states. And if you cant understand that, then yep... your reality. Not the shared one the rest of us live in.edit on 25-12-2012 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Timing
The main thing that is being overlooked is that Joe Sixpack down the street can become POTUS or a congressman just as easily as anyone else in this country.
It's hypocrisy, plain and simple.
Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
Are his children "more valuable" than yours? Are we placing values on people and their lives now?
Originally posted by Timing
reply to post by bknapple32
I guess you missed the news that 20+ kids and adults were murdered in a mass shooting in Newtown, CT.
It looks to me like kids in regular schools need protection too.
That is what I'm having a hard time understanding. Not to mention the POTUS' kids already have a Secret Service detail assigned to them because they are the kids of the POTUS.
Edit to add:
It also makes it hypocritical that these same politicians are the ones that legislate "gun free zones". So if they aren't going to provide protection for our kids then we should be able to provide protection for them, right?edit on 25-12-2012 by Timing because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bknapple32
Originally posted by Timing
The main thing that is being overlooked is that Joe Sixpack down the street can become POTUS or a congressman just as easily as anyone else in this country.
It's hypocrisy, plain and simple.
Jesus....
Ok when joe sixpack is elected president, then his kids get armed guards. Thats how it works. How is this hard for people to understand?
No one is better then the other... Its just certain risks are associated with jobs that are frankly more important. You arent being driven around in bullet proof glass limos or air force one. Cause you arent president.