It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by FreebirdGirl
1)Petraeus made a statement of how America's biggest mideastern problem was Isreal
Source please
2) The Israelis trust Romney( Netanyahu's business buddy) more than Obama
Hardly source that too.
3) Some in Washington are more seriously aligned with Zionists than others
People need to stop using that word considering it's nothing but a pc term for bigotry.
4) Both Jill Kelley and Paula Broadwell have Zionists connectons
Source it
Both Saxby Chambliss and Diane Feinstein made comments and enacted a bill concerning intelligence leaking from the white house months before Benghazi
www.washingtontimes.com...
She was for leaks until she was against leaks.
7) Why would the FBI investigator leak the investigation to Eddie Cantor (R senator) instead of the proper channels?
I really do love this people trying to scapegoat Cantor after Carneys famous:
Carney said, “Well, I would refer you to the FBI. They have, as I understand it, protocols in place for when they notify the legislative and executive branches of investigations.
cnsnews.com...
8) Kelley and her parents are members of the Lebanonese Christian Maronite community they claim Isreal as their ally.
So what does that have to do with anything?
9) Paula Broadwells connection to Madeline Albright and Duane Clarridge
So? the current administration is a whose who of Clintons cabinet.
Then you will have enough information to have a valid theory of what might be happening in Washington
Not really the only thing I saw there was opinion, and someone throwing the word zionist around like normal.
Really want to talk research here:
And We said after Pharaoh to the Children of Israel, "Dwell in the land, and when there comes the promise of the Hereafter, We will bring you forth in [one] gathering."
Which makes Allah the biggest "zionist" there is.
edit on 25-11-2012 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by beezzer
Where you coming from bunny boy? Did you actually read the memo? It is actually only a memo after all, not a law, not an EO... a memo. After the crap Issa et al pulled, I can actually see why he would issue such a memo. Obviously sensitive intelligence has to be scrubbed to a greater degree before being trusted to the GOP in Congress.
U.S. Government Warning This is a United States Government computer system. This computer system, including all related equipment, networks, and network devices, including Internet access, are provided only for authorized U.S. Government use. U.S. Government computer systems may be monitored for all lawful purposes, including ensuring that their use is authorized, for management of the system, to facilitate protection against unauthorized access, and to verify security procedures, survivability, and operational security. Monitoring includes authorized attacks by authorized U.S. Government entities to test or verify the security of this system. During monitoring, information may be examined, recorded, copied, and used for authorized purposes. All information including personal information, placed on or sent over this system may be monitored. Use of this U.S. Government system, authorized or unauthorized, constitutes consent to monitoring of this system. Unauthorized use may subject you to criminal prosecution. Evidence of unauthorized use collected during monitoring may be used for administrative, criminal or other adverse actions. For technical assistance, please contact the ISMC Watch: 301-688-1800 (commercial), 644-1800 (DSN)
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by FreebirdGirl
I have come to realize that some people wouldn't know truth if it came up and bit them on their posteriors especially those who throw the term zionist around.
No offense.
Originally posted by christina-66
The 'dual nationality' issue posted on the site you linked to must surely be of grave concern? Where does one's loyalty lie when it comes to state security? It seems crazy that such people (of any persuasion) are employed in positions where they have access to sensitive materials when their loyalty could be in question.
The question is WHY MAKE AN EXECUTIVE ORDER?
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
My Navy background prompts me to look at the thrust of the document:
"This Presidential Memorandum transmits the National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs (Minimum Standards) to provide direction and guidance to promote the development of effective insider threat programs..."
It means: "This Memorandum is the predictable mindless tripe to tell you what the book attached is. The book ATTACHED, entitled: 'National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards...etc., etc.,' is your guide to developing insider threat programs."
That's all it says; the rest is bombastic blather--also known as filler.
That's why it's not an MSM story....
Originally posted by Montana
Originally posted by Ex_CT2
My Navy background prompts me to look at the thrust of the document:
"This Presidential Memorandum transmits the National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs (Minimum Standards) to provide direction and guidance to promote the development of effective insider threat programs..."
It means: "This Memorandum is the predictable mindless tripe to tell you what the book attached is. The book ATTACHED, entitled: 'National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards...etc., etc.,' is your guide to developing insider threat programs."
That's all it says; the rest is bombastic blather--also known as filler.
That's why it's not an MSM story....
I agree. This is a letter of transmittal.But then we couldn't be having this lovely panic attack and fear fest, and some members may have to go without their recommended daily amount. And where would the fun be in that?
Just put on your rain coat, grab an umbrella, step back and watch the spit fly.
Originally posted by jude11
Please don't comment until you have donned your sheepskin. Oh, wait...
Peace
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
reply to post by Kali74
Correct.
Gold star for you.
Care to address the question of why bother writing anything at all?edit on 25-11-2012 by Asktheanimals because: added comment
Originally posted by Montana
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
reply to post by Kali74
Correct.
Gold star for you.
Care to address the question of why bother writing anything at all?edit on 25-11-2012 by Asktheanimals because: added comment
Because it is A LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL for a new policy that is being instituted relating to people in the government who blab their mouths about things they shouldn't. Basically what this memorandum is saying is...
"People, this is some new stuff that I have read and agree with and am now telling you to accept as approved policy. Read and Heed!"
That's all this is. And I have still to see any reference to Zionists or Israel other than someone's opinion in a blog based on some type of "insider briefing". If anyone can point to a reference in either the memo or the new policy, please point it out to me. Thanks.
Originally posted by Montana
Originally posted by jude11
Please don't comment until you have donned your sheepskin. Oh, wait...
Peace
Really? That's all you got? pfffffffffft!
The document is what it is, and it is a letter of transmittal.
But don't mind me, Rock On Dude!