US Presidential Candidate says , Israel Did 9 - 11 , Zionists Control US Politics.

I'm more concerned with the apparent fact people still believe in presidents...and politics...and a legitimate voting system that is held accountable and verified by....uhh wait you can't verify the votes...someone else does that...its always someone else...its never you, its never me...its never first hand and even if it was...you cant count and verify millions of votes...

You have to trust the voting system there is no way for you to validate it yourself...

fighting over presidents and fighting over politics is like fighting over who would kick whose ass...Santa clause or the easter-bunny...

this candidate says a lot of sensible things...this candidate will not get elected...but then again...it doesn't matter...

From what Ive learned this is the truth and its scary as hell .
It all adds up .
Im just saying

reply to post by FlyersFan

Man you have got to be joking that is the most ignorant statement I've read all day, were do you get your information from plz don't say the news on tv? man o man you have to start doing some serious research because your making yourself sound extremely foolish with a comment like that saying it's a fact radical Muslims flew planes into the buildings lol have you been living under a rock? In fact the scale is tipped so 1 sided on this with the amount of evidence that shows the official story is BS that even an amatur researcher could see threw the veil of lies in little to no time I have no idea how a person could stand so firmly behind our governments tail of the events that took place on 9/11, I am astonished by your ignorance but can't help to smile and laugh lol listen brother just do some more diggin seriously ull be surprised the dots u start connecting!

I don't know but why does this seem to be coming down like Andrew Pike's predictions.

I mean like he was the hugest Free Mason in the US.

I come from a strong background in Masonry.

Who is runing this show.

Originally posted by OOOOOO
3. What happened to all the Gold that was in WTC? Gone.

No, it was all recovered.

4.On 9/10 Rumfeild speak in front of Congress about the missing 2 + Trillion dollars, on 9/11 something hits the Pentagon in the exact spot where all the records of the missing 2 + Trillion dollars were kept.

Rumsfeld never said there was any money missing

7. All you master minds why did builijg 7 go down??

Because it was severely damaged due to the collapse of the WTC North tower

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by OOOOOO
3. What happened to all the Gold that was in WTC? Gone.

No, it was all recovered.

4.On 9/10 Rumfeild speak in front of Congress about the missing 2 + Trillion dollars, on 9/11 something hits the Pentagon in the exact spot where all the records of the missing 2 + Trillion dollars were kept.

Rumsfeld never said there was any money missing

7. All you master minds why did builijg 7 go down??

Because it was severely damaged due to the collapse of the WTC North tower

just one thing wrong with the whole wtc 7 part
youtu.be...
youtu.be...
youtu.be...

the building is still standing while they are reporting it fell

Originally posted by FlyersFan

Originally posted by poloblack
This guy is telling the truth, .

Really? He says Israel did 9-11 and he is 'telling the truth' according to you.
Got some credible proof of that? Nope. Didnt' think so.
The fact is that 19 RADICAL MUSLIMS flew the planes into buildings full of people.
RADICAL MUSLIMS. Not Israel.

Uhhh...the only issue with that is SOME OF THE ALLEGED 'TERRORISTS' ARE STILL ALIVE!

edit on 4-10-2012 by anakark because: (no reason given)

reply to post by hellobruce


WTC7 fell, according to NIST, because structural damage and office furniture fires. Now, use your logic. How does office furniture burning (asymmetric) combined with structural damage (also asymmetric) lead to a perfectly executed symmetrical demolition style collapse.

Please enlighten us all.

I'd never heard of Mr. Miller before and I know nothing about him, but I am glad I saw this interview. He seems very smart, reasonable and rational, but like a lot of people who are worried about the Zionists, or the Israeli right wing and their supporters around the world, he passes lightly over the reason that these people are able to get your ordinary American oligarch to cooperate with them and champion their interests.

The reason is that a belligerant, expansionist Israel is a tool that can be used by a belligerant, expansionist America to aid in gaining control of Middle Eastern oil reserves. If there were no oil in the Middle East, Israel, or something like it would be located , or created in the vicinity of the oil resources to serve the same purpose Israel serves, i.e., to be the camel's nose, into the tent of the people who own the oil.

Focusing on "Zionists" is to stumble into a pitfall where it comes to changing US foreign policy. If I were advising Mr. Miller, whom I like, based on this interview, I would say, "Drop the preoccupation with "Zionists" and concentrate on the effects of the military budget on the domestic economy. Push for American energy independance."

An energy independant America will accord Israel's interests the effort they merit, and they do merit some effort, but no more, no less than that.

Originally posted by haven123
right i take back my original post cant delete it missed time limit but i couldnt watch the vid earlier so just seen the press tv sign on the image,

sorry people i watched it and

this guy for president

Couldn't you have watched the video first before piling in with your completely uninformed opinion? Is this too much to ask of ATS'ers these days?????

I would say that it was either the PNAC group or the Mossad that pulled it off. For instance, they MIGHT have prepped the buildings back during the reconstruction after the first bombing ripped out the parking floors.

But basically, the PNAC is totally loyal to banking, war and the Likud party -- so it's hard to distinguish between them and Mossad anyway.

Cheney did his best with the help of the NSA to get as much dirt as possible on the opposition so he could extort them to follow Bush's policies.

Over all; I can't argue with the premise here. Though it sounds so much like the anti Jewish stuff I railed against when I was younger. It really bothers me since most of my friends were Jewish growing up; but it's like saying being against the Bush crime family is being "anti American" -- adults can distinguish between a small power group inside a nation and saying something about people of a culture, faith or heritage.

Of course, criticizing Israel has always been the third-rail of social etiquette -- because they so tightly control Media and Banking. Let's not pretend otherwise. There might be a token few gentiles in the mix, but it's really hard to not see a pattern of who gets bailed out, who never gets criticized, and how everybody bends over backwards to pledge their allegiance to one small country with little strategic benefits other than being a gadfly for trouble.

Originally posted by anakark
reply to post by hellobruce

 

WTC7 fell, according to NIST, because structural damage and office furniture fires. Now, use your logic. How does office furniture burning (asymmetric) combined with structural damage (also asymmetric) lead to a perfectly executed symmetrical demolition style collapse.

Please enlighten us all.

Even MORE preposterous; it fell because ONE COLUMN out of 150 collapsed -- and all the others failed horizontally. One gash in the corner, meant the center of the building preceded the rest, and the entire building fell straight down -- absolutely level, in a free-fall collapse.

Now we could fantasize about cantilevered trusses on the North and South tower -- but Building 7 was standard concrete and steel. There is ABSOLUTELY no way it could fall that fast -- nor straight down in the the greatest point of resistance.

reply to post by synapsis



Great find

What he is saying is 100% FACT! Do the research people, sheeple defending the status quo stop defending your slave masters its called stockholm syndrome there is treatment for it! I cant rest knowing these monsters got away with killing thousands of my fellow Americans maybe im alone

Once you come to terms with it and snap out of the trance of complacency the rest falls in to place. It makes perfect sense. But so many people cant fathom that people on our side of the fence are capable of this. They forget history for it instances of this has been repeated time and time again. People need to realize they are just a resource in the eyes of these powermad blood drunk monsters. Make no mistake once your shelf life has no value you will be discarded. Dont think it stops at 911. Ritual sacrifice or culling of the herd know you are expendable. And as long as there are agendas (20 to 30 years in advance) and undesirables to burn to make these agendas suffice you will be hoodwinked by these diabolical players in this game. They superseded your governments, played on your emotions winning your hearts then they fought a war for your mind, then they abolished your constituted rights as of recent. When they steal your air and water and sell it back to you for peanuts maybe...maybe when your back is to the wall you may fight back.

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by OOOOOO
3. What happened to all the Gold that was in WTC? Gone.

No, it was all recovered.

4.On 9/10 Rumfeild speak in front of Congress about the missing 2 + Trillion dollars, on 9/11 something hits the Pentagon in the exact spot where all the records of the missing 2 + Trillion dollars were kept.

Rumsfeld never said there was any money missing

7. All you master minds why did builijg 7 go down??

Because it was severely damaged due to the collapse of the WTC North tower

Do you have any sources for YOUR claims? I can't say that the Gold wasn't recovered in WTC 7 -- so it would be interesting to see a link. It's also the reason that the ENRON trials failed to prosecute, and the Bush family got away with billions in Treasury note fraud -- all the court files were in that building.

>> Then you claim that Rumsfeld never made a speech that I distinctly remember him making where he stated the Pentagon could not account for $2.4 Trillion -- and I remember it was on 9/10/2001 and thinking how useless and corrupt the Pentagon was. I absolutely remember that speech. Am I supposed to forget because some random person said it didn't happen? Now here is some anti-truth website with some weasel words -- and they try and make out that "lost trillions" is a false claim because Rumsfeld said "could not account for" ... and as everyone knows; nobody in politics ever acknowledges accountability nor would they say something like "diverted." Rumsfeld saying "cannot account for" is basically the "oops -- we misplaced it" that we would expect -- and exactly what we have evidence of; YOUTUBE VIDEO OF RUMSFELD "missing" TRILLIONS

Oh, and guess what? The part of the Pentagon that was getting "re-built" that the Plane allegedly hit, was the place where these records were stored! Yup. So a lot of people who happened to be "in charge" got to skate by on a lot of issues that day. Just a coincidence!

>> Also, there was PHOTO of the gash in the side of the WTC 7. It didn't compromise more than 10% of the structure -- it was in a CORNER. How does a corner gash cause a symmetrical collapse on a i-Beam/box constructed building? HERE'S A PHOTO OF THE GASH -- they note how it was on the opposite side of the one that preceded the collapse, even though after a few dozen feet, the collapse became perfectly level and acted like there was no resistance.

Is this where everyone is supposed to be convinced because people repeat nonsense over and over again?

reply to post by hellobruce

WTC7 fell, according to NIST, because structural damage and office furniture fires. Now, use your logic. How does office furniture burning (asymmetric) combined with structural damage (also asymmetric) lead to a perfectly executed symmetrical demolition style collapse.

Please enlighten us all.

I will feel obliged

Even MORE preposterous; it fell because ONE COLUMN out of 150 collapsed -- and all the others failed horizontally. One gash in the corner, meant the center of the building preceded the rest, and the entire building fell straight down -- absolutely level, in a free-fall collapse.

Now we could fantasize about cantilevered trusses on the North and South tower -- but Building 7 was standard concrete and steel. There is ABSOLUTELY no way it could fall that fast -- nor straight down in the the greatest point of resistance.

Impossible iron does not buckle under those temperatures. You speak as if the collums were made of butter


Im a iron worker i also worked around demolition teams. I have been welding on iron for 20 years now it's like telling a chef you can cook a turkey with a easy bake oven... that's one powerful light bulb


WTC 7 fell at free fall speed as well without resistance to gravity. It collapsed in it's own footprint. You can even see the sequence of explosions going off inside the structure. All these things are inconsistent with structural collapse. No steel framed building has EVER collapsed due to isolated fires even being set ablaze why? Because it is not scientifically possible.

Do you have any swamp land for sale?

Oh lord, people throw their weight behind someone and don't even bother to check it out. This Miller is running with the American Third Position party.
en.wikipedia.org...
They are a known White Power group Good luck with that non-white folks.

“The American Third Position exists to represent the political interests of White Americans.”
- American Third Position website

american3rdposition.com...
american3rdposition.com...

reply to post by hellobruce

Rumsfeld never said there was any money missing

Time to eat Crow nom nom nom eat hearty

www.youtube.com...

What a complete joke that interview was.

US presidential candidate for November election Merlin Miller

Wait - who?

So some political non-entity gives an interview to Iranian tv and this is somehow supposed to be credible or some kind of evidence?

reply to post by synapsis

It wasn't just the Mossad (Isreali "art students") involved. There had to be collusion with the CIA, and the FBI who refused to investigate the hijackers patsies, some of whom were housed at appartments rented to them by FBI agents. The Saudi hijacker patsies were basically escorted into the country, trained, housed and followed, all the way to the "Big Wedding" which coincided with the War Games operations which served as a smokescreen to ensure the success of the black-op psyop.