It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Gosh, it is like it is getting to the point where a true patriot cant rant on facebook about breaking the law and attacking politicians without getting arrested. George Washington warned us about this!
sarc
Yah those American Patriots from the Revolutionary War where we won freedom from the tyrannical King were some pretty amazing guys. You know they tarred and feathered the Tories who were loyal to the King. Liberals today are too tied up in knots of political correctness. They should know that they are on the front lines of ruining free speech and ever other liberty we had since 1776.
Tarring and feathering
revolution.h-net.msu.edu...
Originally posted by JBA2848
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Did they really tar and feather Ben Franklin?
He was for the other side until it was just not covenant anymore. They would not let him join the government because he was a spy and his loyalties were truely unknown.
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Gosh, it is like it is getting to the point where a true patriot cant rant on facebook about breaking the law and attacking politicians without getting arrested. George Washington warned us about this!
sarc
Yah those American Patriots from the Revolutionary War where we won freedom from the tyrannical King were some pretty amazing guys. You know they tarred and feathered the Tories who were loyal to the King. Liberals today are too tied up in knots of political correctness. They should know that they are on the front lines of ruining free speech and ever other liberty we had since 1776.
Tarring and feathering
revolution.h-net.msu.edu...
Yes, the Founding Fathers spent a lot of time posting pictures of themselves posing with weapons on Facebook.
Your delusions are nauseating.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
My delusions? I just posted a bit of history is all. Did you get the liberal Democrat socialist/Marxist revisionist version or something?
Originally posted by JBA2848
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Must you talk about tar and feathering people and pushing propaganda.
Originally posted by EvilBat
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
My delusions? I just posted a bit of history is all. Did you get the liberal Democrat socialist/Marxist revisionist version or something?
:::Golf Clap::::
For adding blame to other parties and belief systems that go against yours.
Well done. Well done.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
My belief system happens to be based on traditional American history not the Marxist/socialist/communist/liberal revisionist propaganda kind.
Are you even American? I keep seeing the same anti-American people around these boards. Marxist propagandists abound everywhere.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
Is there anyone here who is afraid of calling out the American government for what it's done wrong, and is still doing wrong?
Is anyone here afraid to stand up for their rights, and the rights of future generations? Is anyone afraid to take their place in a revolution if need be?
This is a serious question. Answer honestly, if you would.
Originally posted by groingrinder
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
Is there anyone here who is afraid of calling out the American government for what it's done wrong, and is still doing wrong?
Is anyone here afraid to stand up for their rights, and the rights of future generations? Is anyone afraid to take their place in a revolution if need be?
This is a serious question. Answer honestly, if you would.
STOP ELECTING DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS!! THERE IS YOUR REVOLUTION!
B. Recent behavior “causing’ or ‘attempting” harm is likely to be easy to identify and
document. However, the phase “threatening harm” is broader and more subtle, and
several issues regarding the meaning of this phrase are likely to arise:
Example: Consider a person with a documented history of paranoid
schizophrenia who voices the belief that her neighbors actually are foreign agents
who are spying on her, has called 911 repeatedly to complain about them, and
now has purchased a hunting knife and a rifle in order to “defend myself against
them if it comes to that.” Is she subject to commitment at the present time?
Our Opinion: Admittedly, this woman has not caused or attempted to harm her
neighbors. However, has she engaged in conduct “threatening harm”? The first point to
be noted is that the revised statute does not require evidence that the individual has made
a specific threat against a particular identifiable individual; a generalized expression of
intention or inclination to cause serious harm to anyone as a result of mental illness
would be sufficient.5 In this case, the woman’s conduct would provide a sufficient
behavioral basis for commitment as long as the totality of the evidence supports the
necessary finding.
The woman in the hypothetical case is subject to involuntary commitment if, as a result
of her illness, there is a “substantial likelihood” that, if not treated, she will cause serious
harm to the neighbors or someone else in the near future. Purchasing the weapon and
making these statements under the circumstances would suffice to establish a recent
behavioral basis for the prediction (“recent behavior… threatening harm”) even though
she has not yet caused or attempted harm and has not yet identified a specific victim of an
increasingly likely dangerous act. Whether this woman can be shown, by clear and
convincing evidence, to present a “substantial likelihood” of casing serious harm in the
near future would depend on the full clinical picture, including her history of violence.
The point being made here is that the statements and assembling of weapons would
provide a sufficient behavioral basis for such an otherwise supported clinical judgment.
Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt
reply to post by RobinB022
SO what was he referring to that's supposed to be in Colorado? (near the bottom of the screen captures?)