It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
PRESENTATION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (23 June 2005)
Keith Baverstock PhD; Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Kuopio, KUOPIO, Finland
Thus, detailed examination of DUO reveals three potential risk routes in addition to the conventional radiotoxicity caused by direct irradiation, namely, chemical genotoxicity, synergy between radiation and chemical toxicities and a bystander route.
Since 2002 the evidence for these three routes has not diminished, indeed the reverse is the case. More recent studies have confirmed the earlier studies 9, 10 and concern about the bystander effect in radiotherapy patients continues to rise.
Furthermore, US veterans with DU embedded in their bodies as a result of friendly fire incidents and with high concentrations of DU in their urine, show further evidence of DU's mutagenic potential in their peripheral blood cells 11.
US Army's Expert on Depleted Uranium (DU) :
Nuclear Holocaust and The Politics of Radiation
Dr. Doug Rokke Speaking in Los Altos, CA 21apr03
I got a letter in the memorandum I came from Los Alamos. The famous Los Alamos memorandum. And in this memorandum it was very very clear "Thou shalt right you're after-action report such that they do not reveal the health and environmental consequence of uranium munitions because they will become politically unacceptable." [That's] a direct order.
I'll be dammed if I'll lie for the military.
Then, I got another direct order...
Researchers found a 38-fold increase in leukaemia, a ten-fold increase in female breast cancer and significant increases in lymphoma and brain tumours in adults. At Hiroshima survivors showed a 17-fold increase in leukaemia, but in Fallujah Dr Busby says what is striking is not only the greater prevalence of cancer but the speed with which it was affecting people.
US forces later admitted that they had employed white phosphorus as well as other munitions.
Now, every person in that city knew what was coming and had time to leave. There were pamphlets dropped all oer the city as welll as psyops vehicles blaring messages from the outskirts at night.
And was some of this born out of recklness?
Originally posted by Peruvianmonk
reply to post by usmc0311
What you are talking of is the Second Battle of Fallujah? The first one took place in April 2004.
Now, every person in that city knew what was coming and had time to leave. There were pamphlets dropped all oer the city as welll as psyops vehicles blaring messages from the outskirts at night.
Whatever the warnings not every Iraqi civilian made it out. Many either thought # off to the coalition forces get the # out of my country or could not make it out. The Red Cross estimated 800 Iraqi civilians died in the operation.
www.democracynow.org...
The attack was in the realms of a war crime. The indiscriminate use of White Phosphorous and other weapons without due care to the civilian population certainly puts it in this category.
Do you feel/think from your own experiences and evidence available that you took part in a war crime?edit on 27-5-2012 by Peruvianmonk because: Spelling
I see no reason why DU rounds were even nessasary.
DU, according to most scholars, has been stored in stockpiles since the 1940's when the United States first initiated its Nuclear Weapons Program. What caused this particular material to be utilized as a form of ammunition by the U.S. Army was not only its unique physical properties and extreme effectiveness as a weapon, but certain financial burdens that made it more economical to use rather than store. When DU stockpiles were estimated to be in excess of 500,000 tons, the costs associated with the housing of this kind of material quickly became apparent.
But a little-known 1993 Defense Department document written by then-Brigadier Gen. Eric Shinseki, now the secretary for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), shows that the Pentagon was concerned about DU contamination and the agency had ordered medical testing on all personnel that were exposed to the toxic substance.
The memo, under the subject line, “Review of Draft to Congress – Health and Environmental Consequences of Depleted Uranium in the U.S. Army — Action Memorandum,” makes some small revisions to the details of these three orders from the DoD:
1. Provide adequate training for personnel who may come in contact with DU contaminated equipment.
2. Complete medical testing of all personnel exposed to DU in the Persian Gulf War.
3. Develop a plan for DU contaminated equipment recovery during future operations.
The VA, however, never conducted the medical tests, which may have deprived hundreds of thousands of veterans from receiving medical care to treat cancer and other diseases that result from exposure to DU.