It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
(CNN) -- The Los Angeles Times published photos Wednesday of U.S. soldiers posing with what the newspaper said were bodies of insurgents in Afghanistan -- sparking outrage and condemnation from U.S. military officials.
The two photos published by the paper are among 18 provided by a U.S. soldier, who wanted "to draw attention to the safety risk of a breakdown in leadership and discipline," The Times reported.
The military said an investigation is under way.
The photos, from incidents in 2010, represent "a serious error in judgment by several soldiers who have acted out of ignora
Originally posted by theendisnear69
Ah, the US military, winning over the hearts of the Afghan people.
Originally posted by Shadowalker
Guarding Opium fields is not so glamorous.
Neither is wiping out opposing opium factions under the guise of installing democracy.
Originally posted by theendisnear69
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
100% anti-war thank you very much. Especially when people and corporations are profiting off war.
So you on the other hand believe we should have a military presence in all the countries you listed?
Why?
Originally posted by mobiusmale
They took a picture of the people they just killed...who had just finished trying to kill them.
So what?
Originally posted by theendisnear69
reply to post by TheTardis
Oh yea i'm sure Afghanistan was all about gettin Osama Bin Laden right?
If your worried about that we should be in Saudi Arabia not Afghanistan.
Because I live in a free Democracy and I elected officials (Granted not the ones I voted for but I believe in our system) and those officials deem it necessary. Its not my job to know all of the facts and make the decisions.