It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Where is the cut off point?
Originally posted by Battleline
The idea that a president defends Roe V.Wade by using his daughters as examples for success by being able to lay anyone anytime and have lawfull access to getting rid of there mistakes speaks volums to this clowns mentality and lack of respect for his daughters and there moral standards.
, now he is using his kids on the campaign, you know the ones that were of limits to all others.
Motherhood is not for everyone..abortion should STAY SAFE AND LEGAL!
Originally posted by newsoul
Do cancer cells grow into a baby if left to grow at their own accord? Do parts of the cancer cell turn into arms and legs? Do cancer cells have a brain and a heart?
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
If motherhood is not for everyone maybe they should practice the art of abstinence.
Originally posted by MrWendal
Even Ron Paul signed it, however as you will see in the linked article, he is surrounded by questions because he believes you can not use the 14th Amendment to override the 10th Amendment.
Instead we will argue over what people can do with their own bodies. A subject that does not effect your day to day life in any way shape or form.
If I run out and have an abortion tomorrow, it will not effect your life in any way.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by MrWendal
Even Ron Paul signed it, however as you will see in the linked article, he is surrounded by questions because he believes you can not use the 14th Amendment to override the 10th Amendment.
Yes, he believes in using the 10th to override the 14th. States shouldn't have the right to decide a woman's personal medical decisions.
Ron Paul wants abortion to be illegal. He wants government to interfere in this VERY personal choice. He supports legislation that restricts abortion. It's all part of HIS game. Don't fall for it!
Originally posted by something wicked
Actually, from what I've seen, once again Ron Paul won't even commit one way or another but will let States choose whether they should ban or not -
Paul calls himself "strongly pro-life"[140] and "an unshakable foe of abortion" [141]
Which would lead to an interesting situation wouldn't it? I'm very much pro choice myself, I wonder if that would drive abortion back into the back streets or make it a profit earner for States that decide not to ban?
Originally posted by lampsalot
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by lampsalot
My problem with the pro-abortion people is they use semantics and guilt tripping to justify their position, rather than real solid arguments.
It is not pro-abortion.
It is pro Right of Choice.
I don't use the terms pro-life and pro-choice because they are engineered to demonize the other side. I say pro-abortion and anti-abortion because it's simply stating what your position is without any euphemism. I know pro-abortion people don't LIKE abortion.