It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by niceguybob
Filthy Low Life OWSer's. LOL.... I DARE you to say that to my pretty,smart 20 year old daughter.
We disagree on the movement,but she can kick MY ass.....So I'd be careful.
In a dialog,not by force. She ignores mainstream on this topic.... With good reason I'm observing.
Originally posted by svetlana84
The cost of snow removal in nyc last winter was 29 million$
Source nyt
The treasury paid more than 200 billions on bailouts to financial crooks.
do the math !
and do not blame it on OWS.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by svetlana84
The cost of snow removal in nyc last winter was 29 million$
Source nyt
The treasury paid more than 200 billions on bailouts to financial crooks.
do the math !
and do not blame it on OWS.
Cities's snow removal budget has nothing to do with the treasury
secondly what's your point?
Why don't you go murder 26 Austrian housewives and then say:
So what? How many iraqis died during the Iraq war?
What kind of mentality is this?
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
Zucotti is a private park that they turned into a tent city
And the lease owner has no problem with OWS being there.
Think about it.
Originally posted by assspeaker
I gave this a little more thought. Questioning how OWS could do a better job, and how it could benefit the city's funds.
This is only a proposal, and surely has flaws, but here goes sort of a plan.
1) OWS protesters sign a waiver that they will not intentionally break any laws. This includes the fact that parks close at night, so occupying those at night would not be allowed. And those that don't sign, will not be allowed to join the civilized group.
2) OWS elects a leader figure to run as liaison between OWS and the city. (some groups have taken this step)
3) OWS elects group leaders to oversee, and attempt to thwart any problems. This may include setting up a reformatory and clinics using those protesters that have been trained in health care.
4) OWS provides individuals with radios to police themselves. These people, and at least one channel could be in contact with police if any individual or group starts to get out of hand.
5) OWS provides their own toilets, and food with the funds they HAVE already gathered.
6) OWS begins to suggest solutions to the problems at hand.
7) OWS becomes a self sustaining community.
I know, woulda, shoulda, coulda is a factor. But an about face with professionalism an responsibility would put this movement in a much more serious light. I'm sure I am not the first to suggest this sort of a deviation from the current conditions.edit on 18-11-2011 by assspeaker because: corrections
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by svetlana84
The cost of snow removal in nyc last winter was 29 million$
Source nyt
The treasury paid more than 200 billions on bailouts to financial crooks.
do the math !
and do not blame it on OWS.
Cities's snow removal budget has nothing to do with the treasury
secondly what's your point?
Why don't you go murder 26 Austrian housewives and then say:
So what? How many iraqis died during the Iraq war?
What kind of mentality is this?
Originally posted by FallenWun
No, I expect people to be consistent in their message about less government, less dependance, less spending, less taxes, being self sufficient, boot straps, yadda yadda yadda. I am not sure why I should have to chip in to plow a street because you need to go somewhere. I do not need the government to plow for me. Why so dependent on big government?
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by assspeaker
Really? Did the OWS tell the city to waste (and how much?) money on a police presence that makes the police look like the thugs? Well then you think they should just have unlimited spending to sustain the status quo?
As Capt. Ray Lewis said "The police commisioner works for the mayor, the mayor tells the commisionner how he wants it handled and the commisionner trickles down the orders to the white shirts who then gives the orders to cops"
So once again, don't Occupy Wrong Street
Occupy the mayor's office
See what i'm saying now?
Originally posted by Riffrafter
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by assspeaker
Really? Did the OWS tell the city to waste (and how much?) money on a police presence that makes the police look like the thugs? Well then you think they should just have unlimited spending to sustain the status quo?
As Capt. Ray Lewis said "The police commisioner works for the mayor, the mayor tells the commisionner how he wants it handled and the commisionner trickles down the orders to the white shirts who then gives the orders to cops"
So once again, don't Occupy Wrong Street
Occupy the mayor's office
See what i'm saying now?
You have to watch this "special comment" by Olberman. Probably the most amazing and dead-on thing I've seen on a major broadcast TV show ever....
Originally posted by BohemianBrim
Click here for more information.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Ok that's a completely other topic
Right now the city removes the snow and your money does go towards that
If your money goes towards that you want it done
What you are saying is a completely other topic
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
As a homeowner, taxpayer and FORMER OWS supporter in it's current form, this actually matters quite a bit. I do shovel my own snow. However, I also pay my fair share of taxes into my city. Some of that is intended for things like snow removal on major and secondary streets that the OP is right about. Where will the money come from when it's already been spent?
NONE of that money went with the intention of paying security (police) for protests camping 24/7. When viewed that way it's getting to be a question of whose rights are violated here after all? The OWS camp members or the 99% out here who will get short changed on the service vs. taxes paid? It really is getting into numbers where that is a relevant thing to start discussing.