It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MichelJCardin
reply to post by Aim64C
I will with this; explain how laws were prematurally labelled; - I want you to imagine a cylinder 10 feet in diametre 1000 feet deep filled of water and at the top I want you to place an operation that consists of simply a two feet thick insert that fits with a seal and make it heavyer than water so that it pushes the water down enptying the cylinder completely while use nothing but the same wieght of that of but 2% of what it had moved and what that is incredible is that you could rise that water using a tub , as high up as you want providing that that pusing down wieght always exeeds the extra wieght that the water in the tub weighs and another thing about this is that the larger you go with this ; the larger the difference you are able to obtain in ratio in terms of efficiency because of the comparison between the size differences of the hose and it's containing water and as it needing not to be enlarged even if one expand the system and actually funny but if after you want to return that 2 foot pussing part; all you would need would be to irrigate again the cylinder and if breaking the seal of the disc and having the float on it above it would make it rise until on top again.This here is in refrance to that of your friction theories where in many instances; you can like this one alternate systems being used where that disc is use as while pushing against the water as a separate component with a constant dispersing of a liquide and otherwise it being part of the water mass and the difference in augmented force is incrediblebecause you can make use of forces that have been harvested continuousally by using it's hight that it is now and weight and you can kind of chose any height that you want to drive it. So that is one that is against physics laws.